Literature DB >> 26922565

Investigating the traffic-related environmental impacts of hydraulic-fracturing (fracking) operations.

Paul S Goodman1, Fabio Galatioto2, Neil Thorpe3, Anil K Namdeo4, Richard J Davies5, Roger N Bird6.   

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing (fracking) has been used extensively in the US and Canada since the 1950s and offers the potential for significant new sources of oil and gas supply. Numerous other countries around the world (including the UK, Germany, China, South Africa, Australia and Argentina) are now giving serious consideration to sanctioning the technique to provide additional security over the future supply of domestic energy. However, relatively high population densities in many countries and the potential negative environmental impacts that may be associated with fracking operations has stimulated controversy and significant public debate regarding if and where fracking should be permitted. Road traffic generated by fracking operations is one possible source of environmental impact whose significance has, until now, been largely neglected in the available literature. This paper therefore presents a scoping-level environmental assessment for individual and groups of fracking sites using a newly-created Traffic Impacts Model (TIM). The model produces estimates of the traffic-related impacts of fracking on greenhouse gas emissions, local air quality emissions, noise and road pavement wear, using a range of hypothetical fracking scenarios to quantify changes in impacts against baseline levels. Results suggest that the local impacts of a single well pad may be short duration but large magnitude. That is, whilst single digit percentile increases in emissions of CO2, NOx and PM are estimated for the period from start of construction to pad completion (potentially several months or years), excess emissions of NOx on individual days of peak activity can reach 30% over baseline. Likewise, excess noise emissions appear negligible (<1dBA) when normalised over the completion period, but may be considerable (+3.4dBA) in particular hours, especially in night-time periods. Larger, regional scale modelling of pad development scenarios over a multi-decade time horizon give modest CO2 emissions that vary between 2.5 and 160.4kT, dependent on the number of wells, and individual well fracking water and flowback waste requirements. The TIM model is designed to be adaptable to any geographic area where the required input data are available (such as fleet characteristics, road type and quality), and we suggest could be deployed as a tool to help reach more informed decisions regarding where and how fracking might take place taking into account the likely scale of traffic-related environmental impacts.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air quality; Environment; Fracking; Hydraulic fracturing; Noise; Traffic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26922565     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  6 in total

1.  Natural gas development, flaring practices and paediatric asthma hospitalizations in Texas.

Authors:  Mary Willis; Perry Hystad; Alina Denham; Elaine Hill
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  The association of unconventional natural gas development with diagnosis and treatment of internalizing disorders among adolescents in Pennsylvania using electronic health records.

Authors:  Irena Gorski-Steiner; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Heather E Volk; Sean O'Dell; Brian S Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 8.431

3.  Community concern and government response: Identifying socio-economic and demographic predictors of oil and gas complaints and drinking water impairments in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Cassandra J Clark; Joshua L Warren; Nina Kadan-Lottick; Xiaomei Ma; Michelle L Bell; James E Saiers; Nicole C Deziel
Journal:  Energy Res Soc Sci       Date:  2021-04-24

4.  Truck and Multivehicle Truck Accidents with Injuries Near Colorado Oil and Gas Operations.

Authors:  Benjamin D Blair; John Hughes; William B Allshouse; Lisa M McKenzie; John L Adgate
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Impact of U.S. Oil and Natural Gas Emission Increases on Surface Ozone Is Most Pronounced in the Central United States.

Authors:  Andrea Pozzer; Martin G Schultz; Detlev Helmig
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Unconventional Oil and Gas Development Exposure and Risk of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Case-Control Study in Pennsylvania, 2009-2017.

Authors:  Cassandra J Clark; Nicholaus P Johnson; Mario Soriano; Joshua L Warren; Keli M Sorrentino; Nina S Kadan-Lottick; James E Saiers; Xiaomei Ma; Nicole C Deziel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 11.035

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.