Literature DB >> 26922459

The capacity of aquatic macrophytes for phytoremediation and their disposal with specific reference to water hyacinth.

Solomon W Newete1, Marcus J Byrne2,3.   

Abstract

The actual amount of fresh water readily accessible for use is <1 % of the total amount of water on earth, and is expected to shrink further due to the projected growth of the population by a third in 2050. Worse yet are the major issues of water pollution, including mining and industrial waste which account for the bulk of contamination sources. The use of aquatic macrophytes as a cost-effective and eco-friendly tool for phytoremediation is well documented. However, little is known about the fate of those plants after phytoremediation. This paper reviews the options for safe disposal of waste plant biomass after phytoremediation. Among the few mentioned in the literature are briquetting, incineration and biogasification. The economic viability of such processes and the safety of their economic products for domestic use are however, not yet established. Over half of the nations in the world are involved in mining of precious metals, and tailings dams are the widespread legacy of such activities. Thus, the disposal of polluted plant biomass onto mine storage facilities such as tailing dams could be an interim solution. There, the material can act as mulch for the establishment of stabilizing vegetation and suppress dust. Plant decomposition might liberate its contaminants, but in a site where containment is a priority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decomposition; Macrophytes; Phytoremediation; Pollution; Safe disposal; Tailings dam

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26922459     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-6329-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  41 in total

1.  PHYTOREMEDIATION.

Authors:  D. E. Salt; R. D. Smith; I. Raskin
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1998-06

Review 2.  The chemistry of conventional and alternative treatment systems for the neutralization of acid mine drainage.

Authors:  Margarete Kalin; Andrew Fyson; William N Wheeler
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 3.  Microbial and plant derived biomass for removal of heavy metals from wastewater.

Authors:  Sarabjeet Singh Ahluwalia; Dinesh Goyal
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 9.642

4.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of seminatural wetlands and activated sludge wastewater-treatment systems.

Authors:  Ilda Mannino; Daniel Franco; Enrico Piccioni; Laura Favero; Erika Mattiuzzo; Gabriele Zanetto
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Comparative study on chemical pretreatments to accelerate enzymatic hydrolysis of aquatic macrophyte biomass used in water purification processes.

Authors:  D Mishima; M Tateda; M Ike; M Fujita
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 6.  Phytoremediation: a novel strategy for the removal of toxic metals from the environment using plants.

Authors:  D E Salt; M Blaylock; N P Kumar; V Dushenkov; B D Ensley; I Chet; I Raskin
Journal:  Biotechnology (N Y)       Date:  1995-05

Review 7.  Environmental challenge vis a vis opportunity: the case of water hyacinth.

Authors:  Anushree Malik
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 9.621

8.  Using Mediterranean shrubs for the phytoremediation of a soil impacted by pyritic wastes in Southern Spain: a field experiment.

Authors:  Eduardo Moreno-Jiménez; Saúl Vázquez; Ramón O Carpena-Ruiz; Elvira Esteban; Jesús M Peñalosa
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 6.789

9.  Uptake rates of nitrogen and phosphorus in the water by Eichhornia crassipes and Salvinia auriculata.

Authors: 
Journal:  Rev Bras Biol       Date:  2000-05

10.  Use of commercial plant species in a hydroponic system to treat domestic wastewaters.

Authors:  Nathalie Vaillant; Fabien Monnet; Huguette Sallanon; Alain Coudret; Adnane Hitmi
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.751

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effective phytoremediation of low-level heavy metals by native macrophytes in a vanadium mining area, China.

Authors:  Bo Jiang; Yi Xing; Baogang Zhang; Ruquan Cai; Dayi Zhang; Guangdong Sun
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Sequestration of precious and pollutant metals in biomass of cultured water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes).

Authors:  Solomon W Newete; Barend F N Erasmus; Isabel M Weiersbye; Marcus J Byrne
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-07-31       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Accumulation of heavy metals in a macrophyte Phragmites australis: implications to phytoremediation in the Arabian Peninsula wadis.

Authors:  Ali A Al-Homaidan; Turki G Al-Otaibi; Mohamed A El-Sheikh; Abdullah A Al-Ghanayem; Fuad Ameen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  A comparison of trace metal bioaccumulation and distribution in Typha latifolia and Phragmites australis: implication for phytoremediation.

Authors:  Agnieszka Klink
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Effects of pH, initial Pb2+ concentration, and polyculture on lead remediation by three duckweed species.

Authors:  Jie Tang; Chunxia Chen; Lei Chen; Maurycy Daroch; Yan Cui
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-03       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Maintenance management and eradication of established aquatic invaders.

Authors:  Daniel Simberloff
Journal:  Hydrobiologia       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 2.822

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.