| Literature DB >> 26922085 |
Abstract
Significant improvement in outcomes for patients with carotid stenosis requires liberation from the historic fixation with randomization and a procedurally based, late-stage, reactive approach to medical care. We require a multipronged and multidisciplinary approach that includes all of the following: (i) removal of overreliance on, and biased use of, randomized trial data; (ii) using accurate ways to rank evidence quality and relevance; (iii) improved research reporting standards; (iv) building quality assurance and other research capability into routine practice; (v) producing evidence-true rather than evidence-based guidelines; (vi) bringing current optimal medical treatment to the community and measuring its effectiveness; (vii) funding only interventions known to help patients when and where they are treated and use the savings to fund vital research, including quality assurance in routine practice; and (viii) recognize that making the indication for carotid procedures obsolete is a good thing.Entities:
Keywords: carotid angioplasty/stenting; carotid endarterectomy; carotid stenosis; guidelines; quality assurance; stroke prevention
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26922085 DOI: 10.1177/0003319716631266
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Angiology ISSN: 0003-3197 Impact factor: 3.619