Literature DB >> 26922050

Comparison of subcutaneous versus submuscular expander placement in the first stage of immediate breast reconstruction.

Lin Zhu1, Anita T Mohan2, Jad M Abdelsattar3, Zhen Wang4, Aparna Vijayasekaran3, Soyun M Hwang3, Nho V Tran3, Michel Saint-Cyr5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Tissue expander-based two-stage reconstruction remains the most commonly used technique in immediate breast reconstruction. This study compares the subcutaneous expander placement to the traditional submuscular placement and describes our early experience with the expander insertion plane-choosing algorithm.
METHODS: A retrospective study of patients who underwent two-stage immediate breast reconstruction from May 2012 to October 2014 was conducted. All expander insertion planes were chosen using the same algorithm. Expansion, pain, and complications were compared between two groups.
RESULTS: The study included 88 patients (158 expanders; 50 subcutaneous and 108 submuscular). The subcutaneous group had a higher intraoperative expansion ratio (p < 0.001), high first postoperative expansion ratio (p < 0.001), shorter duration of expansion (p = 0.02), less number of expansion visits (p = 0.002), and less average pain during admission (p = 0.004). Significant differences in the intraoperative and first postoperative expansion ratios in patients with postmastectomy radiation therapy were also found between the two groups (p = 0.005 and 0.01, respectively). Complications during expansion and after second-stage autologous flap reconstruction were comparable between two groups.
CONCLUSION: The subcutaneous expander placement was associated with greater intraoperative and first postoperative expansion, shorter expansion duration, less expansion visits, and less pain. With the expander insertion plane-choosing algorithm, subcutaneous expander placement could be performed with comparable complications rates with the submuscular placement during expansion and after second-stage autologous flap reconstruction. Further studies can be performed due to the lack of long-term complications following second-stage implant reconstruction in the subcutaneous approach.
Copyright © 2016 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast reconstruction outcome; Subcutaneous tissue expansion; Submuscular tissue expansion; Tissue expander; Two-stage immediate breast reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26922050     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  25 in total

Review 1.  Two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Maurice Y Nahabedian; Steven R Jacobson
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-02

2.  Selective pectoralis major muscle denervation in breast reconstruction: a technical modification for more effective and cosmetic results.

Authors:  Marco Bernini; Donato Casella; Carlo Mariotti
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-12

Review 3.  Strategies and considerations in selecting between subpectoral and prepectoral breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Ara A Salibian; Jordan D Frey; Nolan S Karp
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-02

4.  Preoperative Psychosocial and Psychophysical Phenotypes as Predictors of Acute Pain Outcomes After Breast Surgery.

Authors:  Kristin L Schreiber; Nantthasorn Zinboonyahgoon; Xinling Xu; Tara Spivey; Tari King; Laura Dominici; Ann Partridge; Mehra Golshan; Gary Strichartz; Rob R Edwards
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 5.820

5.  Pre-pectoral breast reconstruction: early and long-term safety evaluation of 146 unselected cases of the early pre-pectoral era of a single-institution, including cases with previous breast irradiation and post-mastectomy radiation therapy.

Authors:  Marco Bernini; Icro Meattini; Calogero Saieva; Carlotta Becherini; Viola Salvestrini; Luca Visani; Giulia Stocchi; Chiara Bellini; Victoria Lorenzetti; Silvia Sordi; Jacopo Nori; Diego De Benedetto; Isacco Desideri; Simonetta Bianchi; Lorenzo Livi; Lorenzo Orzalesi
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 4.239

6.  Acellular dermal matrix in implant-based immediate breast reconstructions: a comparison of prepectoral and subpectoral approach.

Authors:  Mihir Navin Chandarana; Sadaf Jafferbhoy; Sekhar Marla; Soni Soumian; Sankaran Narayanan
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-08

7.  Prepectoral and Subpectoral Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of 90-Day Clinical and Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes.

Authors:  Jonas A Nelson; Meghana G Shamsunder; Joshua Vorstenbosch; Thais O Polanco; Evan Matros; Michelle R Coriddi; Babak J Mehrara; Robert J Allen; Joseph H Dayan; Joseph J Disa
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 5.169

8.  Subcutaneous Implant-based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix/Mesh: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ara A Salibian; Jordan D Frey; Mihye Choi; Nolan S Karp
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-11-23

9.  Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction with Fenestrated Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Novel Design.

Authors:  Keyianoosh Z Paydar; Garrett A Wirth; Donald S Mowlds
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-04-04

10.  Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Tissue Expander Placement: A Clinical and Quality of Life Outcomes Study.

Authors:  Gurjot S Walia; Jeffrey Aston; Ricardo Bello; Gina A Mackert; Rachel A Pedreira; Brian H Cho; Hannah M Carl; Erin M Rada; Gedge D Rosson; Justin M Sacks
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.