Elizabeth M Bell1, Alison L Pruziner1, Jason M Wilken2, Erik J Wolf3. 1. Department of Rehabilitation, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA; DOD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, San Antonio, TX, USA. 2. Center for the Intrepid, San Antonio Military Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX 78234, USA. 3. Department of Rehabilitation, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA; DOD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, San Antonio, TX, USA. Electronic address: erik.j.wolf6.civ@mail.mil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Individuals with transfemoral amputation often have difficulty descending sloped surfaces due to increased lower extremity range of motion and torque requirements. The X2®, a new microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee, claims to improve gait over sloped terrain. The aim of this study was to evaluate how experienced prosthesis users descended a sloped surface using the X2®, compared to a conventional knee, either mechanical (MECH) or microprocessor (MP). METHODS: Descent technique and biomechanics were assessed in 21 service members with unilateral transfemoral amputation as they descended an instrumented 10° slope at a self-selected walking velocity. FINDINGS: Use of the X2® in the MECH group resulted in greater hill assessment scores (8.5 to 11.0, P=0.026), due primarily to decreased reliance on handrail use. The use of the X2® in the MP group increased prosthetic knee flexion to a median of 6.4° at initial contact (P=0.002) and 73.7° in swing (P=0.005), contributing to longer prosthetic limb steps (P=0.024) and increased self-selected velocity (P=0.041). Additionally, the use of the X2® in the MP group increased prosthetic limb impact peaks (11.6N/kg, P=0.004), improving impact peak symmetry to -1.3% (P=0.004). INTERPRETATION: Decreased reliance on handrail use as MECH users descended in the X2® indicate improved function and perhaps greater confidence in the device. Additional biomechanical improvements for existing MP users suggest potential longer-term benefits with regard to intact limb health and overuse injuries.
BACKGROUND: Individuals with transfemoral amputation often have difficulty descending sloped surfaces due to increased lower extremity range of motion and torque requirements. The X2®, a new microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee, claims to improve gait over sloped terrain. The aim of this study was to evaluate how experienced prosthesis users descended a sloped surface using the X2®, compared to a conventional knee, either mechanical (MECH) or microprocessor (MP). METHODS: Descent technique and biomechanics were assessed in 21 service members with unilateral transfemoral amputation as they descended an instrumented 10° slope at a self-selected walking velocity. FINDINGS: Use of the X2® in the MECH group resulted in greater hill assessment scores (8.5 to 11.0, P=0.026), due primarily to decreased reliance on handrail use. The use of the X2® in the MP group increased prosthetic knee flexion to a median of 6.4° at initial contact (P=0.002) and 73.7° in swing (P=0.005), contributing to longer prosthetic limb steps (P=0.024) and increased self-selected velocity (P=0.041). Additionally, the use of the X2® in the MP group increased prosthetic limb impact peaks (11.6N/kg, P=0.004), improving impact peak symmetry to -1.3% (P=0.004). INTERPRETATION: Decreased reliance on handrail use as MECH users descended in the X2® indicate improved function and perhaps greater confidence in the device. Additional biomechanical improvements for existing MP users suggest potential longer-term benefits with regard to intact limb health and overuse injuries.