| Literature DB >> 26921197 |
Fabiano S de Vargas1, Patricia D O Almeida1, Ana Paula A de Boleti1, Maria M Pereira1, Tatiane P de Souza1, Marne C de Vasconcellos1, Cecilia Veronica Nunez2, Adrian M Pohlit2, Emerson S Lima3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Amazon is the largest rainforest in the world and is home to a rich biodiversity of medicinal plants. Several of these plants are used by the local population for the treatment of diseases, many of those with probable anti-inflammatory effect. The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the in vitro antioxidant and anti-peroxidases potential of the ethanol extracts of five plants from the Brazilian Amazon (Byrsonima japurensis, Calycophyllum spruceanum, Maytenus guyanensis, Passiflora nitida and Ptychopetalum olacoides).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26921197 PMCID: PMC4769535 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-1061-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Medicinal plants used in this study
| Plant species | Common name | Part used | Traditional use |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Saratudo | Stem bark | Indicated against various inflammatory disorders, especially in the uterus and prostate |
|
| Mulateiro | Stem bark | For age spots, cuts, diabetes, eye infections, ovarian problems, scars, scrapes, skin fungi, skin parasites, skin problems, wrinkles, and wounds, and as an antioxidant and cosmetic |
|
| Chichuá | Stem bark | Used as a stimulant, tonic and muscle relaxant, to relieve arthritis, rheumatism, hemorrhoids, swollen kidney, skin rashes, skin cancer prevention. |
|
| Maracujá-do-mato | Leaves | Treatment of gastrointestinal disorders |
|
| Muirapuama | Leaves | Used as tonic neuromuscular, neurasthenia, impotence, menstrual disorders, dysentery. It also has stimulant properties of the central nervous system. |
Experimental procedures used in preparation of extracts
| Species | Part used | Solvent | Oven drying | Extraction | Time | Solvents evaporation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Bark | Ethanol | Room temperature | Cold Maceration | 48 h | Evaporator rotative and lyophilization |
|
| Bark | Ethanol | Room temperature | Cold Maceration | 48 h | Evaporator rotative and lyophilization |
|
| Bark | Ethanol | Hot air (45 °C/48 h) | Cold Maceration with ultrasound bath | 20 min | Evaporator rotative and lyophilization |
|
| Leaf | Ethanol | Room temperature | Cold Maceration | 48 h | Evaporator rotative and lyophilization |
|
| Leaf | Ethanol | Hot air (45 °C/48 h) | Cold Maceration with ultrasound bath | 20 min | Evaporator rotative and lyophilization |
1 – Simões, et al. 2004 [9]. 2 – Macari, et al. 2006 [8]
Total polyphenols and free radical scavenger activity (IC50 in μg/mL) of Amazonian medicinal plants
| Species | Phenols | ABTS | DPPH | O2 -• | 1ΔgO2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 59.4 | 12.3 ± 0.2 | 8.4 ± 0.6 | 44.9 ± 6.4 | 1408 ± 113 |
|
| 60.2 | 5.0 ± 0.1 | 7.5 ± 0.9 | 18.2 ± 3.0 | 92.4 ± 24.8 |
|
| 58.7 | 8.2 ± 0.3 | 28.4 ± 0.8 | 35.3 ± 3.0 | 517 ± 70.8 |
|
| 3.2 | 38.5 ± 1.9 | 49.9 ± 0.1 | 100 ± 9.9 | In |
|
| 2.1 | 8.7 ± 0.3 | 29.7 ± 0.3 | 142 ± 16.5 | 715 ± 195 |
| α-tocopherol | - | 12.5 ± 0.6 | 10.4 ± 0.4 | 180 ± 14.4 | nd |
| Ascorbic acid | - | 4.8 ± 0.3 | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 32.9 ± 1.6 | nd |
| Gallic acid | - | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 7.8 ± 1.2 | nd |
| DABCO | - | nd | nd | nd | 58.4 ± 6.0 |
| TROLOX® | - | 3.9 ± 0.1 | 5.6 ± 0.2 | nd | nd |
Note: nd not determined, in. inactive. Phenols are expressed in Equivalent of Gallic acid/g dry extract
Fig. 1Antioxidant activity by β–carotene/linoleic bleaching assay (a) and cell-based assay (b) of ethanol extracts of five Amazonian medicinal plants at 100 μg/mL. Values are the mean ± S.D from three independent experiments. Significance was determined using Student’s-t-test (*p < 0.05 compared to control BHT (a) and quercetin (b)
Fig. 2Inhibition of HRP (a) and MPO (b), using the amplex red and hydrogen peroxide of ethanol extracts of five Amazonian medicinal plants at 100 μg/mL. Values are the mean ± S.D from three independent experiments. Significance was determined using Student’s-t-test (*p < 0.05 compared to control DMSO)