Literature DB >> 26921063

QT Dynamics During Exercise in Asymptomatic Children with Long QT Syndrome Type 3.

Kazuhiro Takahashi1, Taisuke Nabeshima2, Mami Nakayashiro2, Hitoshi Ganaha2.   

Abstract

Sympathetic provocative testing is commonly used to detect the abnormal QT dynamics in long QT syndrome (LQTS) patients, particularly LQTS type 1 and type 2. However, little is known about LQTS type 3 (LQT3). We investigated QT dynamics during exercise testing in LQTS patients, particularly LQT3. This study included 37 subjects, comprising 16 genotyped LQTS patients and 21 unrelated healthy subjects without QT prolongation. LQTS patients were divided into LQT3 and non-LQT3 groups. During exercise tests using a modified Bruce protocol, 12-lead electrocardiogram monitoring was performed using a novel multifunctional electrocardiograph. QT intervals were automatically measured. The QT/heart rate (HR) relationship was visualized by plotting the beat-to-beat confluence of the recorded data. A linear regression analysis was performed to determine the QT/HR slope and intercept. Estimated QT intervals at HR 60 bpm (QT60) were calculated by the regression line formula. QT/HR slopes were steeper for each LQTS group than for the control group (P < 0.001). QT60 values demonstrated a moderate correlation with QT intervals at rest (P < 0.0001) for both groups. The corrected QT intervals (QTc) at 4 min of recovery after exercise were significantly longer in the non-LQT3 group than in the control group but were not different between the LQT3 and the control groups. Abnormal QT dynamics during exercise testing were observed in both LQT3 patients and other LQTS subtypes. This method may be useful for directing genetic testing in subjects with borderline prolonged QT intervals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exercise test; Long QT syndrome; QT dynamics; Ventricular repolarization

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26921063     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-016-1360-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  35 in total

1.  Challenges of diagnosing long QT syndrome in patients with nondiagnostic resting QTc.

Authors:  Wojciech Zareba
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Autonomic neural control of heart rate during dynamic exercise: revisited.

Authors:  Daniel W White; Peter B Raven
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Autonomic nervous system influences on QT interval in normal subjects.

Authors:  Anthony R Magnano; Steve Holleran; Rajasekhar Ramakrishnan; James A Reiffel; Daniel M Bloomfield
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-06-05       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Epinephrine-induced QT interval prolongation: a gene-specific paradoxical response in congenital long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Michael J Ackerman; Anant Khositseth; David J Tester; Joseph B Hejlik; Win-Kuang Shen; Co-burn J Porter
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 5.  Epinephrine QT stress testing in congenital long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Himeshkumar Vyas; Michael J Ackerman
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 1.438

6.  QT dynamics evaluated on fully automated QT measurement in children.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Takahashi; Taisuke Nabeshima; Arata Sashinami; Mami Nakayashiro; Hitoshi Ganaha
Journal:  Pediatr Int       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 1.524

7.  Diagnostic value of epinephrine test for genotyping LQT1, LQT2, and LQT3 forms of congenital long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Wataru Shimizu; Takashi Noda; Hiroshi Takaki; Noritoshi Nagaya; Kazuhiro Satomi; Takashi Kurita; Kazuhiro Suyama; Naohiko Aihara; Kenji Sunagawa; Shigeyuki Echigo; Yoshihiro Miyamoto; Yasunao Yoshimasa; Kazufumi Nakamura; Tohru Ohe; Jeffrey A Towbin; Silvia G Priori; Shiro Kamakura
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.343

8.  QT interval-heart rate relation during exercise in normal men and women: definition by linear regression analysis.

Authors:  P Kligfield; K G Lax; P M Okin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Exercise stress test amplifies genotype-phenotype correlation in the LQT1 and LQT2 forms of the long-QT syndrome.

Authors:  Kotoe Takenaka; Tomohiko Ai; Wataru Shimizu; Atsushi Kobori; Tomonori Ninomiya; Hideo Otani; Tomoyuki Kubota; Hiroshi Takaki; Shiro Kamakura; Minoru Horie
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Utility of treadmill testing in identification and genotype prediction in long-QT syndrome.

Authors:  Jorge A Wong; Lorne J Gula; George J Klein; Raymond Yee; Allan C Skanes; Andrew D Krahn
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-01-09
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of the QT Interval in Athletes: Red Flags and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Nikhil Ahluwalia; Hariharan Raju
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-08-27

2.  Dynamic QT response to cold-water face immersion in long-QT syndrome type 3.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Takahashi; Wataru Shimizu; Naomasa Makita; Mami Nakayashiro
Journal:  Pediatr Int       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 1.524

Review 3.  The congenital long QT syndrome Type 3: An update.

Authors:  Andrés Ricardo Pérez-Riera; Raimundo Barbosa-Barros; Rodrigo Daminello Raimundo; Marianne Penachini da Costa de Rezende Barbosa; Isabel Cristina Esposito Sorpreso; Luiz Carlos de Abreu
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2017-10-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.