H Sudo 1 , K Kaneda 2 , Y Shono 3 , N Iwasaki 1 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
AIMS: A total of 30 patients with thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated between 1989 and 2000 with anterior correction and fusion surgery using dual-rod instrumentation were reviewed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes were compared among patients with lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) at the lower end vertebra (LEV; EV group) (n = 13) and those treated by short fusion (S group), with LIV one level proximal to EV (n = 17 patients). RESULTS: The allocation of the surgical technique was determined by the flexibility of the TL/L curves and/or neutral vertebrae located one level above LEV as determined on preoperative radiographs. If these requirements were met a short fusion was performed. The mean follow-up period was 21.4 years (16 to 27). The mean correction rate at final follow-up was significantly lower in the S group (74 sd 11%) than in the EV group (88 sd 13%) (p = 0.004).Coronal and sagittal balance, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and clinical outcomes evaluated by the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire scores were equivalent between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Short fusion strategy, which uses LIV one level proximal to LEV can be considered as an alternative to the conventional strategy, which includes LEV in the fusion, when highly flexible TL/L curves are confirmed and/or neutral vertebrae are located one level above LEV in patients with thoracolumbar/lumbar AIS curves. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Short fusion strategy can be considered as an alternative to the conventional strategy in patients with thoracolumbar/lumbar AIS curves undergoing anterior spinal fusion with dual-rod instrumentation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:402-9. ©2016 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
AIMS: A total of 30 patients with thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated between 1989 and 2000 with anterior correction and fusion surgery using dual-rod instrumentation were reviewed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes were compared among patients with lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) at the lower end vertebra (LEV ; EV group) (n = 13) and those treated by short fusion (S group), with LIV one level proximal to EV (n = 17 patients ). RESULTS: The allocation of the surgical technique was determined by the flexibility of the TL/L curves and/or neutral vertebrae located one level above LEV as determined on preoperative radiographs. If these requirements were met a short fusion was performed. The mean follow-up period was 21.4 years (16 to 27). The mean correction rate at final follow-up was significantly lower in the S group (74 sd 11%) than in the EV group (88 sd 13%) (p = 0.004).Coronal and sagittal balance, thoracic kyphosis , lumbar lordosis , and clinical outcomes evaluated by the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire scores were equivalent between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Short fusion strategy, which uses LIV one level proximal to LEV can be considered as an alternative to the conventional strategy, which includes LEV in the fusion, when highly flexible TL/L curves are confirmed and/or neutral vertebrae are located one level above LEV in patients with thoracolumbar/lumbar AIS curves. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Short fusion strategy can be considered as an alternative to the conventional strategy in patients with thoracolumbar/lumbar AIS curves undergoing anterior spinal fusion with dual-rod instrumentation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:402-9. ©2016 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
Entities: Chemical
Disease
Species
Keywords:
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis;anterior spinal fusion;short fusion;long-term follow-up
Mesh: See more »
Year: 2016
PMID: 26920967 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B3.36715
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bone Joint J ISSN: 2049-4394 Impact factor: 5.082