Literature DB >> 26920607

Individualized approaches to thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation.

Oliver J Ziff1, A John Camm2.   

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia worldwide. The prevalence of AF in persons older than 55 years is at least 33.5 million globally and is predicted to more than double in the next half-century. Anticoagulation, heart rate control, and heart rhythm control comprise the 3 main treatment strategies in AF. Anticoagulation is aimed at preventing debilitating stroke, systemic embolism, and associated mortality. Historically, anticoagulation in AF was achieved with a vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin, which is supported by evidence demonstrating reduced incident stroke and all-cause mortality. However, warfarin has unpredictable pharmacokinetics with many drug-drug interactions that require regular monitoring to ensure patients remain in the therapeutic anticoagulant range. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban provide a possible solution to these issues with their more predictable pharmacokinetics, rapid onset of action, and greater specificity. Results from large randomized, controlled trials indicate that these agents are at least noninferior to warfarin in prevention of stroke. These trials also demonstrate a consistently lower incidence of intracranial hemorrhage, almost always all life-threatening bleeds, and many forms of major bleeds with the possible exception of gastrointestinal and some other forms of mucosal bleeding, compared with warfarin. Patients with AF are a heterogeneous population with diverse risk of stroke and bleeding, and different subgroups respond differently to anticoagulation. Important clinical questions have arisen regarding optimal anticoagulation drug selection in distinct populations such as those with renal impairment, older age, coronary artery disease, and heart failure as well as those at particularly high risk for bleeding or thromboembolism. In this review, treatment strategies in AF management are discussed in the context of different individual subgroups of patients.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26920607     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  3 in total

1.  Rationale, design, and preliminary results of the Quebec Warfarin Cohort Study.

Authors:  Sylvie Perreault; Payman Shahabi; Robert Côté; Stéphanie Dumas; Étienne Rouleau-Mailloux; Yassamin Feroz Zada; Sylvie Provost; Ian Mongrain; Marc Dorais; Thao Huynh; Simon Kouz; Ariel Diaz; Mark Blostein; Simon de Denus; Jacques Turgeon; Jeffrey Ginsberg; Jacques Lelorier; Lyne Lalonde; Lambert Busque; Jeannine Kassis; Mario Talajic; Jean-Claude Tardif; Marie-Pierre Dubé
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Clinical pharmacist implementation of a medication assessment tool for long-term management of atrial fibrillation in older persons.

Authors:  Marise Gauci; Francesca Wirth; Lilian M Azzopardi; Anthony Serracino-Inglott
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2019-03-18

3.  Clinical Prediction Model for Time in Therapeutic Range While on Warfarin in Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Brent A Williams; Michael A Evans; Ashley M Honushefsky; Peter B Berger
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 5.501

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.