Literature DB >> 26920130

A novel approach for the development of tiered use biological criteria for rivers and streams in an ecologically diverse landscape.

R William Bouchard1, Scott Niemela2, John A Genet2, Chris O Yoder3, John Sandberg2, Joel W Chirhart2, Mike Feist2, Benjamin Lundeen2, Dan Helwig2.   

Abstract

Water resource protection goals for aquatic life are often general and can result in under protection of some high quality water bodies and unattainable expectations for other water bodies. More refined aquatic life goals known as tiered aquatic life uses (TALUs) provide a framework to designate uses by setting protective goals for high quality water bodies and establishing attainable goals for water bodies altered by legally authorized legacy activities (e.g., channelization). Development of biological criteria or biocriteria typically requires identification of a set of least- or minimally-impacted reference sites that are used to establish a baseline from which goals are derived. Under a more refined system of stream types and aquatic life use goals, an adequate set of reference sites is needed to account for the natural variability of aquatic communities (e.g., landscape differences, thermal regime, and stream size). To develop sufficient datasets, Minnesota employed a reference condition approach in combination with an approach based on characterizing a stream's response to anthropogenic disturbance through development of a Biological Condition Gradient (BCG). These two approaches allowed for the creation of ecologically meaningful and consistent biocriteria within a more refined stream typology and solved issues related to small sample sizes and poor representation of minimally- or least-disturbed conditions for some stream types. Implementation of TALU biocriteria for Minnesota streams and rivers will result in consistent and protective goals that address fundamental differences among waters in terms of their potential for restoration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aquatic ecosystems; Biological condition gradient; Biological integrity; Clean Water Act; Tiered aquatic life uses

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26920130     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5181-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  3 in total

1.  Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition.

Authors:  John L Stoddard; David P Larsen; Charles P Hawkins; Richard K Johnson; Richard H Norris
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.657

2.  The biological condition gradient: a descriptive model for interpreting change in aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Susan P Davies; Susan K Jackson
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.657

3.  Multiple human pressures and their spatial patterns in European running waters.

Authors:  Rafaela Schinegger; Clemens Trautwein; Andreas Melcher; Stefan Schmutz
Journal:  Water Environ J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.070

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Biological assessment of western USA sandy bottom rivers based on modeling historical and current fish and macroinvertebrate data.

Authors:  Robert M Hughes; Meredith Zeigler; Shann Stringer; Gordon W Linam; Joseph Flotemersch; Benjamin Jessup; Seva Joseph; Gerald Jacobi; Lynette Guevara; Robert Cook; Patricia Bradley; Kristopher Barrios
Journal:  River Res Appl       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.780

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.