Literature DB >> 26920058

Improving residue-residue contact prediction via low-rank and sparse decomposition of residue correlation matrix.

Haicang Zhang1, Yujuan Gao2, Minghua Deng3, Chao Wang1, Jianwei Zhu1, Shuai Cheng Li4, Wei-Mou Zheng5, Dongbo Bu6.   

Abstract

Strategies for correlation analysis in protein contact prediction often encounter two challenges, namely, the indirect coupling among residues, and the background correlations mainly caused by phylogenetic biases. While various studies have been conducted on how to disentangle indirect coupling, the removal of background correlations still remains unresolved. Here, we present an approach for removing background correlations via low-rank and sparse decomposition (LRS) of a residue correlation matrix. The correlation matrix can be constructed using either local inference strategies (e.g., mutual information, or MI) or global inference strategies (e.g., direct coupling analysis, or DCA). In our approach, a correlation matrix was decomposed into two components, i.e., a low-rank component representing background correlations, and a sparse component representing true correlations. Finally the residue contacts were inferred from the sparse component of correlation matrix. We trained our LRS-based method on the PSICOV dataset, and tested it on both GREMLIN and CASP11 datasets. Our experimental results suggested that LRS significantly improves the contact prediction precision. For example, when equipped with the LRS technique, the prediction precision of MI and mfDCA increased from 0.25 to 0.67 and from 0.58 to 0.70, respectively (Top L/10 predicted contacts, sequence separation: 5 AA, dataset: GREMLIN). In addition, our LRS technique also consistently outperforms the popular denoising technique APC (average product correction), on both local (MI_LRS: 0.67 vs MI_APC: 0.34) and global measures (mfDCA_LRS: 0.70 vs mfDCA_APC: 0.67). Interestingly, we found out that when equipped with our LRS technique, local inference strategies performed in a comparable manner to that of global inference strategies, implying that the application of LRS technique narrowed down the performance gap between local and global inference strategies. Overall, our LRS technique greatly facilitates protein contact prediction by removing background correlations. An implementation of the approach called COLORS (improving COntact prediction using LOw-Rank and Sparse matrix decomposition) is available from http://protein.ict.ac.cn/COLORS/.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Background correlation removal; Correlation analysis; Low-rank and sparse matrix decomposition; Protein contacts prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26920058     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.01.188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  7 in total

1.  Synthetic protein alignments by CCMgen quantify noise in residue-residue contact prediction.

Authors:  Susann Vorberg; Stefan Seemayer; Johannes Söding
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Deducing high-accuracy protein contact-maps from a triplet of coevolutionary matrices through deep residual convolutional networks.

Authors:  Yang Li; Chengxin Zhang; Eric W Bell; Wei Zheng; Xiaogen Zhou; Dong-Jun Yu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 3.  Advances in Chromatin and Chromosome Research: Perspectives from Multiple Fields.

Authors:  Andrews Akwasi Agbleke; Assaf Amitai; Jason D Buenrostro; Aditi Chakrabarti; Lingluo Chu; Anders S Hansen; Kristen M Koenig; Ajay S Labade; Sirui Liu; Tadasu Nozaki; Sergey Ovchinnikov; Andrew Seeber; Haitham A Shaban; Jan-Hendrik Spille; Andrew D Stephens; Jun-Han Su; Dushan Wadduwage
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Forecasting residue-residue contact prediction accuracy.

Authors:  P P Wozniak; B M Konopka; J Xu; G Vriend; M Kotulska
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Improving prediction of burial state of residues by exploiting correlation among residues.

Authors:  Hai'e Gong; Haicang Zhang; Jianwei Zhu; Chao Wang; Shiwei Sun; Wei-Mou Zheng; Dongbo Bu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  COMTOP: Protein Residue-Residue Contact Prediction through Mixed Integer Linear Optimization.

Authors:  Md Selim Reza; Huiling Zhang; Md Tofazzal Hossain; Langxi Jin; Shengzhong Feng; Yanjie Wei
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-30

7.  Predicting protein inter-residue contacts using composite likelihood maximization and deep learning.

Authors:  Haicang Zhang; Qi Zhang; Fusong Ju; Jianwei Zhu; Yujuan Gao; Ziwei Xie; Minghua Deng; Shiwei Sun; Wei-Mou Zheng; Dongbo Bu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.