Literature DB >> 26919659

Use of Monte Carlo Simulations to Determine Optimal Carbapenem Dosing in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Prolonged Intermittent Renal Replacement Therapy.

Susan J Lewis1, Michael B Kays2, Bruce A Mueller3.   

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses with Monte Carlo simulations (MCSs) can be used to integrate prior information on model parameters into a new renal replacement therapy (RRT) to develop optimal drug dosing when pharmacokinetic trials are not feasible. This study used MCSs to determine initial doripenem, imipenem, meropenem, and ertapenem dosing regimens for critically ill patients receiving prolonged intermittent RRT (PIRRT). Published body weights and pharmacokinetic parameter estimates (nonrenal clearance, free fraction, volume of distribution, extraction coefficients) with variability were used to develop a pharmacokinetic model. MCS of 5000 patients evaluated multiple regimens in 4 different PIRRT effluent/duration combinations (4 L/h × 10 hours or 5 L/h × 8 hours in hemodialysis or hemofiltration) occurring at the beginning or 14-16 hours after drug infusion. The probability of target attainment (PTA) was calculated using ≥40% free serum concentrations above 4 times the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for the first 48 hours. Optimal doses were defined as the smallest daily dose achieving ≥90% PTA in all PIRRT combinations. At the MIC of 2 mg/L for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, optimal doses were doripenem 750 mg every 8 hours, imipenem 1 g every 8 hours or 750 mg every 6 hours, and meropenem 1 g every 12 hours or 1 g pre- and post-PIRRT. Ertapenem 500 mg followed by 500 mg post-PIRRT was optimal at the MIC of 1 mg/L for Streptococcus pneumoniae. Incorporating data from critically ill patients receiving RRT into MCS resulted in markedly different carbapenem dosing regimens in PIRRT from those recommended for conventional RRTs because of the unique drug clearance characteristics of PIRRT. These results warrant clinical validation.
© 2016, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  doripenem; ertapenem; imipenem; meropenem; pharmacokinetics; prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26919659     DOI: 10.1002/jcph.727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  6 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Limited Sampling Strategies Based on Healthy Volunteers for Monitoring of Ertapenem in Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis.

Authors:  S P van Rijn; M A Zuur; R van Altena; O W Akkerman; J H Proost; W C M de Lange; H A M Kerstjens; D J Touw; T S van der Werf; J G W Kosterink; J W C Alffenaar
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Inadequate antibiotic dosing in patients receiving sustained low efficiency dialysis.

Authors:  Leigh Anne Keough; Amy Krauss; Joanna Q Hudson
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-07-26

3.  Optimal Empiric Treatment for Klebsiella pneumoniae Infections in Short-Stay ICU Patients During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Results from a Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis.

Authors:  Yuhong Jin; Haiyan Mao; Bingyang Liu; Fen Zhou; Junjie Yang; Lei Xu; Jingtao Tong; Chen Huang; Yi Ding
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Antimicrobial Doses in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Comparison of Dosing Strategies.

Authors:  Anna P Kempke; Abbie S Leino; Farzad Daneshvar; John Andrew Lee; Bruce A Mueller
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2016-06-28

5.  Cefepime dosing regimens in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy: a Monte Carlo simulation study.

Authors:  Weerachai Chaijamorn; Taniya Charoensareerat; Nattachai Srisawat; Sutthiporn Pattharachayakul; Apinya Boonpeng
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2018-09-12

6.  The landscape of renal replacement therapy in Veterans Affairs Medical Center intensive care units.

Authors:  Chandan Vangala; Maulin Shah; Natasha N Dave; Layth Al Attar; Sankar D Navaneethan; Venkat Ramanathan; Susan Crowley; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.606

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.