Literature DB >> 26919494

A prospective study of a protocol that reduces readmission after liver transplantation.

Mark W Russo1, David M Levi1, Ruth Pierce1, Vincent Casingal1, Lon Eskind1, Andrew deLemos1, Paul A Schmeltzer1, Philippe J Zamor1.   

Abstract

Health care has shifted to placing priority on quality and value instead of volume. Liver transplantation uses substantial resources and is associated with high readmission rates. Our goal was to determine if a protocol designed to reduce readmission after liver transplant was effective. We conducted a prospective study of a protocol designed to reduce readmission rates after liver transplantation by expanding outpatient services and alternatives to readmission. The 30-day readmission rate 1 year after implementing the protocol was compared to the 30-day rate for 2 years prior to implementation. Multivariate analysis was used to control for potential confounding factors. Over the study period, 167 adult primary liver transplants were performed with a mean biological Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of 21 ± 8. Fifty-seven (34%) patients were readmitted. The most common reason for readmission was biliary complications (n = 13). The 30-day readmission rate decreased from 40% before implementing the protocol to 20% after implementation (P = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, the protocol remained associated with readmission (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.92; P = 0.03). The mean length of stay after transplant was 13 ± 12 days preprotocol and 9 ± 5 days postprotocol (P = 0.09). Alternatives to readmission, including hospital lodging and observation status, were main factors in reducing readmission rates. If the most recent definitions of inpatient admission and observation status were applied over the entire study period, then the readmission rates preprotocol and postprotocol were 31% and 20% indicating that the revised definition of observation status accounted for 45% of the reduction in the readmission rate. Readmission after liver transplantation can be reduced without increasing length of stay by implementing a specifically designed protocol that expands outpatient services and alternatives to inpatient admission. Liver Transplantation 22 765-772 2016 AASLD.
© 2016 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26919494     DOI: 10.1002/lt.24424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  9 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing medication management for patients with cirrhosis: Evidence-based strategies and their outcomes.

Authors:  Mary J Thomson; Anna S Lok; Elliot B Tapper
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.828

2.  An Advanced Practice Practitioner-Based Program to Reduce 30- and 90-Day Readmissions After Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Nadim Mahmud; Samantha Halpern; Rebecca Farrell; Kate Ventura; Arwin Thomasson; Heidi Lewis; Kim M Olthoff; Matthew H Levine; Susanna Nazarian; Vandana Khungar
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  National assessment of early hospitalization after liver transplantation: Risk factors and association with patient survival.

Authors:  Pratima Sharma; Nathan P Goodrich; Douglas E Schaubel; Abigail R Smith; Robert M Merion
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.799

4.  Quality Metrics in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kendra E Brett; Lindsay J Ritchie; Emily Ertel; Alexandria Bennett; Greg A Knoll
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Healthcare utilization after liver transplantation is highly variable among both centers and recipients.

Authors:  T Bittermann; R A Hubbard; M Serper; J D Lewis; S F Hohmann; L B VanWagner; D S Goldberg
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 6.  The Future of Quality Improvement for Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Elliot B Tapper; Neehar D Parikh
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 6.112

7.  Emergency department visits and unanticipated readmissions after liver transplantation: A retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Seung-Young Oh; Jeong Moo Lee; Hannah Lee; Chul-Woo Jung; Nam-Joon Yi; Kwang-Woong Lee; Kyung-Suk Suh; Ho Geol Ryu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Medication-Related Problems in Outpatients With Decompensated Cirrhosis: Opportunities for Harm Prevention.

Authors:  Kelly L Hayward; Preya J Patel; Patricia C Valery; Leigh U Horsfall; Catherine Y Li; Penny L Wright; Caroline J Tallis; Katherine A Stuart; Katharine M Irvine; W Neil Cottrell; Jennifer H Martin; Elizabeth E Powell
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2019-03-18

9.  Thirty-day readmission rates, trends and its impact on liver transplantation recipients: a national analysis.

Authors:  Khalid Mumtaz; Jannel Lee-Allen; Kyle Porter; Sean Kelly; James Hanje; Lanla F Conteh; Anthony J Michaels; Ashraf El-Hinnawi; Ken Washburn; Sylvester M Black; Marwan S Abougergi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.