Literature DB >> 26919305

T2* mapping of subtalar cartilage: Precision and association between anatomical variants and cartilage composition.

Ans Van Ginckel1, Sophie De Mits2,3,4, Kim L Bennell1, Adam L Bryant1, Erik E Witvrouw2,5.   

Abstract

Hindfoot arthritis is an important contributor to foot pain and physical disability. While the subtalar joint (STJ) is most frequently affected, anatomical variants such as facet configuration were suggested to further STJ cartilage deterioration. T2* mapping enables detection of ultra-structural cartilage change, particularly in thin cartilage layers, but its feasibility in the STJ has not yet been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate segmentation consistency and inter-scan short-term precision error of T2* mapping of talocalcaneal cartilage and to investigate the relationship between facet configuration and STJ T2* values. Using 3Tesla morphological magnetic resonance imaging, STJ configuration was categorized according to the degree of fusion between anterior, medial, or posterior facets. Subsequently, two repeats of multi-echo gradient recalled echo sequences were performed to obtain T2* maps with repositioning. Segmentation consistency of T2* values attained an ICC of 0.90 (95%CI 0.69-0.99). Precision errors comprised a coefficient of variation (CV) ranging 0.01-0.05, corresponding to a root mean square CV of 0.03-0.04. A 2-joint configuration type (i.e., fused anterior-medial facets) was significantly associated with a decrease in posterior facet T2* values (β = -0.6, p = 0.046). STJ T2* mapping is a reliable method requiring at least a 4% difference within people to enable detection of significant change. Anatomical variants in STJ configuration were associated with T2* values with the more stable 3-joint types exhibiting more favorable cartilage outcomes. Longer-term larger-scaled studies focusing on arthritis pathology are needed to further support the use of T2* mapping in hindfoot disease monitoring.
© 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:1969-1976, 2016. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; T2*; anatomy; reliability; subtalar joint

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26919305     DOI: 10.1002/jor.23214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of T2 Relaxation Values in Subtalar Cartilage between Patients with Lateral Instability of the Ankle Joint and Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Hyun Su Kim; Young Cheol Yoon; Ki Sun Sung; Min-Ji Kim; Soohyun Ahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  [Advanced cartilage imaging for detection of cartilage injuries and osteochondral lesions].

Authors:  A S Gersing; B J Schwaiger; K Wörtler; P M Jungmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Femoral Head Articular Cartilage Change in Patients with Hip Osteonecrosis Treated with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy.

Authors:  Lijun Shi; Xu Yang; Peixu Wang; Xiangwei Ma; Dan Li; Xinjie Wu; Fuqiang Gao; Wei Sun
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.149

4.  Impact of Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability with Lateral Collateral Ligament Injuries on Biochemical Alterations in the Cartilage of the Subtalar and Midtarsal Joints Based on MRI T2 Mapping.

Authors:  Hongyue Tao; Yiwen Hu; Rong Lu; Yuyang Zhang; Yuxue Xie; Tianwu Chen; Shuang Chen
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Talar and Subtalar T1ρ Relaxation Times in Limbs with and without Chronic Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Kyeongtak Song; Brian Pietrosimone; Joshua N Tennant; Daniel B Nissman; Katherine M Dederer; Chinmay Paranjape; Erik A Wikstrom
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 4.634

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.