Literature DB >> 26918569

Salt-tolerant rootstock increases yield of pepper under salinity through maintenance of photosynthetic performance and sinks strength.

Consuelo Penella1, Marco Landi2, Lucia Guidi3, Sergio G Nebauer4, Elisa Pellegrini5, Alberto San Bautista6, Damiano Remorini7, Cristina Nali8, Salvador López-Galarza9, Angeles Calatayud10.   

Abstract

The performance of a salt-tolerant pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) accession (A25) utilized as a rootstock was assessed in two experiments. In a first field experiment under natural salinity conditions, we observed a larger amount of marketable fruit (+75%) and lower Blossom-end Root incidence (-31%) in commercial pepper cultivar Adige (A) grafted onto A25 (A/A25) when compared with ungrafted plants. In order to understand this behavior a second greenhouse experiment was conducted to determine growth, mineral partitioning, gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters, antioxidant systems and proline content in A and A/A25 plants under salinity conditions (80 mM NaCl for 14 days). Salt stress induced significantly stunted growth of A plants (-40.6% of leaf dry weight) compared to the control conditions, while no alterations were observed in A/A25 at the end of the experiment. Accumulation of Na(+) and Cl(-) in leaves and roots was similar in either grafted or ungrafted plants. Despite the activation of protective mechanisms (increment of superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase activity and non-photochemical quenching), A plants showed severely reduced photosynthetic CO2 assimilation (-45.6% of AN390) and substantial buildup of malondialdehyde (MDA) by-product, suggesting the inability to counteract salt-triggered damage. In contrast, A/A25 plants, which had a constitutive enhanced root apparatus, were able to maintain the shoot and root growth under salinity conditions by supporting the maintained photosynthetic performance. No increases in catalase and ascorbate peroxidase activities were observed in response to salinity, and MDA levels increased only slightly; indicating that alleviation of oxidative stress did not occur in A/A25 plants. In these plants the increased proline levels could protect enzymatic stability from salt-triggered damage, preserving the photosynthetic performance. The results could indicate that salt stress was vanished by the lack of negative effects on photosynthesis that support the maintained plant growth and increased marketable yield of the grafted plants.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antioxidant systems; Capsicum annuum; Chlorophyll fluorescence; Grafting; NaCl stress; Proline

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26918569     DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2016.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0176-1617            Impact factor:   3.549


  18 in total

1.  24-Epibrassinolide alleviates the toxic effects of NaCl on photosynthetic processes in potato plants.

Authors:  Liliya V Kolomeichuk; Marina V Efimova; Ilya E Zlobin; Vladimir D Kreslavski; Ol'ga K Murgan; Irina S Kovtun; Vladimir A Khripach; Vladimir V Kuznetsov; Suleyman I Allakhverdiev
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Frequently asked questions about chlorophyll fluorescence, the sequel.

Authors:  Hazem M Kalaji; Gert Schansker; Marian Brestic; Filippo Bussotti; Angeles Calatayud; Lorenzo Ferroni; Vasilij Goltsev; Lucia Guidi; Anjana Jajoo; Pengmin Li; Pasquale Losciale; Vinod K Mishra; Amarendra N Misra; Sergio G Nebauer; Simonetta Pancaldi; Consuelo Penella; Martina Pollastrini; Kancherla Suresh; Eduardo Tambussi; Marcos Yanniccari; Marek Zivcak; Magdalena D Cetner; Izabela A Samborska; Alexandrina Stirbet; Katarina Olsovska; Kristyna Kunderlikova; Henry Shelonzek; Szymon Rusinowski; Wojciech Bąba
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  H2O2 participates in ABA regulation of grafting-induced chilling tolerance in cucumber.

Authors:  Chunyu Lv; Fude Li; Xizhen Ai; Huangai Bi
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.570

4.  Leveraging a graft collection to develop metabolome-based trait prediction for the selection of tomato rootstocks with enhanced salt tolerance.

Authors:  Chao Song; Tania Acuña; Michal Adler-Agmon; Shimon Rachmilevitch; Simon Barak; Aaron Fait
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 7.291

Review 5.  Vegetable Grafting: The Implications of a Growing Agronomic Imperative for Vegetable Fruit Quality and Nutritive Value.

Authors:  Marios C Kyriacou; Youssef Rouphael; Giuseppe Colla; Rita Zrenner; Dietmar Schwarz
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 6.  Grafting: A Technique to Modify Ion Accumulation in Horticultural Crops.

Authors:  Muhammad A Nawaz; Muhammad Imtiaz; Qiusheng Kong; Fei Cheng; Waqar Ahmed; Yuan Huang; Zhilong Bie
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Mechanistic Insight into Salt Tolerance of Acacia auriculiformis: The Importance of Ion Selectivity, Osmoprotection, Tissue Tolerance, and Na+ Exclusion.

Authors:  Md M Rahman; Md A Rahman; Md G Miah; Satya R Saha; M A Karim; Mohammad G Mostofa
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Protection of Pepper Plants from Drought by Microbacterium sp. 3J1 by Modulation of the Plant's Glutamine and α-ketoglutarate Content: A Comparative Metabolomics Approach.

Authors:  Juan I Vílchez; Karsten Niehaus; David N Dowling; Jesús González-López; Maximino Manzanera
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  Molecular Responses during Plant Grafting and Its Regulation by Auxins, Cytokinins, and Gibberellins.

Authors:  Anket Sharma; Bingsong Zheng
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2019-08-22

10.  Impact of Grafting, Salinity and Irrigation Water Composition on Eggplant Fruit Yield and Ion Relations.

Authors:  Gülüzar Duygu Semiz; Donald L Suarez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.