Literature DB >> 26918437

Manufacturing method affects mitochondrial DNA release and extracellular vesicle composition in stored red blood cells.

S Bakkour1, J P Acker2,3, D M Chafets1, H C Inglis1, P J Norris1,4,5, T-H Lee1, M P Busch1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are found in transfusion products, but their potential impacts are not fully understood. We examined the influence of manufacturing method on levels of mitochondrial (mt) DNA and extracellular vesicle (EV) DAMPs in red cell concentrates (RCCs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-seven RCCs were prepared using nine different methods (6-15 units/method), including three apheresis, five whole blood (WB)-derived leucoreduced (LR) and one WB-derived non-LR method. On storage days 5 and 42, levels of mtDNA (by PCR) and number and cell of origin of EVs (by flow cytometry) were assessed in RCC supernatants.
RESULTS: There was a 100-fold difference in mtDNA levels among methods, with highest levels in non-LR, followed by MCS+ and Trima apheresis RCCs. There was a 10-fold difference in EV levels among methods. RBC-derived CD235a+ EVs were found in fresh RCCs and increased in most during storage. Platelet-derived CD41a+ EVs were highest in non-LR and Trima RCCs and did not change during storage. WBC-derived EVs were low in most RCCs; CD14+ EVs increased in several RCCs during storage.
CONCLUSION: DAMPs in RCCs vary by manufacturing method. MtDNA and EV could be informative quality markers that may be relevant to RCC immunomodulatory potential.
© 2016 International Society of Blood Transfusion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood component; extracellular vesicles; manufacture; microparticles; mitochondrial DNA; process; red blood cells; storage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26918437     DOI: 10.1111/vox.12390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vox Sang        ISSN: 0042-9007            Impact factor:   2.144


  18 in total

Review 1.  Red blood cell storage lesion: causes and potential clinical consequences.

Authors:  Tatsuro Yoshida; Michel Prudent; Angelo D'alessandro
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Blood manufacturing methods affect red blood cell product characteristics and immunomodulatory activity.

Authors:  Ruqayyah J Almizraq; Philip J Norris; Heather Inglis; Somaang Menocha; Mathijs R Wirtz; Nicole Juffermans; Suchitra Pandey; Philip C Spinella; Jason P Acker; Jennifer A Muszynski
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-09-25

3.  Methodological considerations for linked blood donor-component-recipient analyses in transfusion medicine research.

Authors:  Nareg Roubinian; Steven Kleinman; Edward L Murphy; Simone A Glynn; Gustaf Edgren
Journal:  ISBT Sci Ser       Date:  2019-08-28

4.  Processing methods and storage duration impact extracellular vesicle counts in red blood cell units.

Authors:  Clementine Gamonet; Maxime Desmarets; Guillaume Mourey; Sabeha Biichle; Sophie Aupet; Caroline Laheurte; Anne François; Eric Resch; Frédéric Bigey; Delphine Binda; Laurent Bardiaux; Christian Naegelen; Nadine Marpaux; Fanny Angelot Delettre; Philippe Saas; Pascal Morel; Pierre Tiberghien; Jacques Lacroix; Gilles Capellier; Chrystelle Vidal; Francine Garnache-Ottou
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-11-10

5.  New blood for old? High quality evidence that fresh red blood cells confer no benefit for critically ill patients.

Authors:  Timothy S Walsh; Nicole P Juffermans
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Effect of donor, component, and recipient characteristics on hemoglobin increments following red blood cell transfusion.

Authors:  Nareg H Roubinian; Colleen Plimier; Jennifer P Woo; Catherine Lee; Roberta Bruhn; Vincent X Liu; Gabriel J Escobar; Steven H Kleinman; Darrell J Triulzi; Edward L Murphy; Michael P Busch
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Red blood cell storage time and transfusion: current practice, concerns and future perspectives.

Authors:  María García-Roa; María Del Carmen Vicente-Ayuso; Alejandro M Bobes; Alexandra C Pedraza; Ataúlfo González-Fernández; María Paz Martín; Isabel Sáez; Jerard Seghatchian; Laura Gutiérrez
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 8.  Mechanisms of red blood cell transfusion-related immunomodulation.

Authors:  Kenneth E Remy; Mark W Hall; Jill Cholette; Nicole P Juffermans; Kathleen Nicol; Allan Doctor; Neil Blumberg; Philip C Spinella; Philip J Norris; Mary K Dahmer; Jennifer A Muszynski
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Effect of Fresh vs Standard-issue Red Blood Cell Transfusions on Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Philip C Spinella; Marisa Tucci; Dean A Fergusson; Jacques Lacroix; Paul C Hébert; Stéphane Leteurtre; Kenneth B Schechtman; Allan Doctor; Robert A Berg; Tina Bockelmann; J Jaime Caro; Fabrizio Chiusolo; Lucy Clayton; Jill M Cholette; Gonzalo Garcia Guerra; Cassandra D Josephson; Kusum Menon; Jennifer A Muszynski; Marianne E Nellis; Amrita Sarpal; Stephanie Schafer; Marie E Steiner; Alexis F Turgeon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  RBC Transfusion Practice in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support.

Authors:  Jennifer A Muszynski; Ron W Reeder; Mark W Hall; Robert A Berg; Thomas P Shanley; Christopher J L Newth; Murray M Pollack; David Wessel; Joseph Carcillo; Rick Harrison; Kathleen L Meert; J Michael Dean; Tammara Jenkins; Robert F Tamburro; Heidi J Dalton
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.