SeonAe Yeo1,2, Carmen D Samuel-Hodge2,3, Rachael Smith1, Jennifer Leeman1,2, Amanda M Ferraro4, Josephine K Asafu-Adjei1,5. 1. School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 2. Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 3. Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 4. Undergraduate Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 5. Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine health departments' (HD) capacity to adapt and implement an intervention to prevent excessive gestational weight gain. DESIGN AND SAMPLE: Seventy-seven stakeholders (nurses, nutritionists, social workers, health educators, health directors, and multilingual service providers) in nine HDs participated. A descriptive mixed methods approach was used to collect data at workshops held onsite to introduce the evidence-based intervention (EBI) and discuss its adaptation. MEASURES: A survey was administered to assess the intervention's fit with the HDs context. Generalized logit mixed models were used to analyze the survey data. The discussions of adaptation were audiotaped and thematically analyzed to identify factors influencing implementation. RESULTS: The majority of stakeholders desired to participate in the training portion of the EBI, but they were reluctant to adopt it, and noted a lack of adequate resources. From the audiotaped narratives, three themes emerged: (1) Patient needs and resources, (2) Perception about adaptability of the EBI, and (3) The complexity of the EBI for pregnant populations. CONCLUSION: Although the EBI was effective for low-income nonpregnant populations in southeastern regions, pregnancy and complex antenatal services make this intervention unrealistic to be adapted as a part of prenatal care at HDs.
OBJECTIVE: To examine health departments' (HD) capacity to adapt and implement an intervention to prevent excessive gestational weight gain. DESIGN AND SAMPLE: Seventy-seven stakeholders (nurses, nutritionists, social workers, health educators, health directors, and multilingual service providers) in nine HDs participated. A descriptive mixed methods approach was used to collect data at workshops held onsite to introduce the evidence-based intervention (EBI) and discuss its adaptation. MEASURES: A survey was administered to assess the intervention's fit with the HDs context. Generalized logit mixed models were used to analyze the survey data. The discussions of adaptation were audiotaped and thematically analyzed to identify factors influencing implementation. RESULTS: The majority of stakeholders desired to participate in the training portion of the EBI, but they were reluctant to adopt it, and noted a lack of adequate resources. From the audiotaped narratives, three themes emerged: (1) Patient needs and resources, (2) Perception about adaptability of the EBI, and (3) The complexity of the EBI for pregnant populations. CONCLUSION: Although the EBI was effective for low-income nonpregnant populations in southeastern regions, pregnancy and complex antenatal services make this intervention unrealistic to be adapted as a part of prenatal care at HDs.
Authors: Lawrence J Appel; Catherine M Champagne; David W Harsha; Lawton S Cooper; Eva Obarzanek; Patricia J Elmer; Victor J Stevens; William M Vollmer; Pao-Hwa Lin; Laura P Svetkey; Sarah W Stedman; Deborah R Young Journal: JAMA Date: 2003 Apr 23-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A F L Bogaerts; R Devlieger; E Nuyts; I Witters; W Gyselaers; B R H Van den Bergh Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Carmen D Samuel-Hodge; Larry F Johnston; Ziya Gizlice; Beverly A Garcia; Sara C Lindsley; Kathy P Bramble; Trisha E Hardy; Alice S Ammerman; Patricia A Poindexter; Julie C Will; Thomas C Keyserling Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2009-04-30 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Kristina M Renault; Kirsten Nørgaard; Lisbeth Nilas; Emma M Carlsen; Dina Cortes; Ole Pryds; Niels J Secher Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-09-20 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Shelly M Asbee; Todd R Jenkins; Jennifer R Butler; John White; Mollie Elliot; Allyson Rutledge Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Jodie M Dodd; Deborah Turnbull; Andrew J McPhee; Andrea R Deussen; Rosalie M Grivell; Lisa N Yelland; Caroline A Crowther; Gary Wittert; Julie A Owens; Jeffrey S Robinson Journal: BMJ Date: 2014-02-10
Authors: Assiamira Ferrara; Monique M Hedderson; Susan D Brown; Samantha F Ehrlich; Ai-Lin Tsai; Juanran Feng; Maren Galarce; Santica Marcovina; Patrick Catalano; Charles P Quesenberry Journal: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 32.069
Authors: Alison G Cahill; Debra Haire-Joshu; W Todd Cade; Richard I Stein; Candice L Woolfolk; Kelle Moley; Amit Mathur; Kenneth Schechtman; Samuel Klein Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 5.002