Literature DB >> 26917023

A comparative study of the therapeutic effect between long and short intramedullary nails in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly.

Xue-Feng Guo1, Ke-Ming Zhang, Hong-Bo Fu, Wen Cao, Qiang Dong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical effects of long vs. short intramedullary nails in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in old patients more than 65 years old.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 178 cases of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur (AO type A1 and A2) in the elderly was conducted from January 2008 to December 2013. There were 85 males (47.8%) and 93 females (52.2%) with the age of 65e89 (70.2±10.8) years. The patients were treated by closed reduction and long or short intramedullary nail (Gamma 3) fixation. The length of short nail was 180 mm and that for long nail was 320e360 mm. The general data of patients, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, preoperative hemoglobin level, blood transfusion rate, postoperative periprosthetic fractures, infections, complications, etc were carefully recorded.
RESULTS: There were 76 cases (42.7%) in the long intramedullary nail group and 102 cases (57.3%) in the short nail group. All the cases were followed up for 12e48 (21.3±6.8) months, during which there were 21 deaths (11.8%), mean (13.8±6.9) months after operation. The intraoperative blood loss was (90.7±50.6) ml in short nail group, greatly less than that in long nail group (127.8±85.9) ml (p=0.004). The short nail group also had a significantly shorter operation time (43.5 min±12.3 min vs. 58.5 min±20.3 min, p=0.002) and lower rate of postoperative transfusion (42.3% vs. 56.7%, p=0.041). But the length of hospital stay showed no big differences. After operation, in each group there was 1 case of periprosthetic fracture with a total incidence of 1.1%, 1.3% in long nail group and 0.9% in short nail group. At the end of the follow-up, all patients achieved bony union. The average healing time of the long nail group was (6.5±3.1) months, and the short nail group was (6.8±3.7) months, revealing no significant differences (p=0.09). Postoperative complications showed no great differences either.
CONCLUSION: Both the intramedullary long and short nail fixation has a good clinical effect in treating intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly. They showed no significant difference in terms of therapeutic effect, hospital stay and postoperative complications. The incidence of periprosthetic fractures treated by either length of nails was low. But short intramedullary nailing can obviously decrease the intraoperative blood loss, operation time and postoperative blood transfusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26917023     DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2015.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin J Traumatol        ISSN: 1008-1275


  6 in total

1.  Short versus long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (AO 31-A1 and AO 31-A2): a systematic review.

Authors:  Pernille Bovbjerg; Lonnie Froberg; Hagen Schmal
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-07-18

2.  How are peri-implant fractures below short versus long cephalomedullary nails different?

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Brett P Salazar; Jamie Furness; James E Feng; Malcolm R DeBaun; Sean T Campbell; Justin F Lucas; William W Cross; Philipp Leucht; Kevin D Grant; Michael J Gardner; Julius A Bishop
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-09-09

3.  Short or long intramedullary devices for hip fracture? A systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Piers R J Page; William E C Poole; Kanishk Shah; Piyush K Upadhyay
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-29

4.  Clinical Outcomes of Intermediate-Length Cephalomedullary Nails for Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Repair in Older Adults.

Authors:  Paul A Enns; Sue M Nyberg; Gina M Berg; Morgan A Galliart; Brent D Sarauer; Andrew A Scheer; Bradley R Dart; Chad M Corrigan
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2020-05-21

5.  Clinical outcomes following long versus short cephalomedullary devices for fixation of extracapsular hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gabriel Kai Yang Tan; Christoph Sheng Chong; Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The choice of internal fixator for fractures around the femoral trochanter depends on area classification.

Authors:  Hiroaki Kijima; Shin Yamada; Natsuo Konishi; Hitoshi Kubota; Hiroshi Tazawa; Takayuki Tani; Norio Suzuki; Keiji Kamo; Yoshihiko Okudera; Ken Sasaki; Tetsuya Kawano; Naohisa Miyakoshi; Yoichi Shimada
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-09-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.