Literature DB >> 26915843

Variation in Comedication Use According to Kidney Transplant Immunosuppressive Regimens: Application of Integrated Registry and Pharmacy Claims Data.

K L Lentine1, A S Naik2, M Schnitzler3, D Axelrod4, J Chen3, D C Brennan5, D L Segev6, B L Kasiske7, H Randall3, V R Dharnidharka5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modern immunosuppression therapies (ISx) have many side effects, and transplant recipients must take an array of "comedications" to help mitigate complications. Comedication use patterns are not well described in large, representative samples because of lack of data.
METHODS: We integrated national U.S. transplant registry data with pharmacy records (2005-2010) from a large pharmaceutical claims clearinghouse to examine treatments for anemia, metabolic disorders, and infections in relation to ISx regimens in months 6-12 post-transplantation (N = 22,453). Associations of ISx with comedication use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]) were quantified with multivariate logistic regression including adjustment for recipient, donor, and transplant factors.
RESULTS: Compared to a reference regimen of tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, and prednisone, sirolimus-based ISx was associated with significantly more common use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (aOR 2.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.06-3.09), iron (aOR 2.26, 95% CI 1.92-2.65), statins (aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.33-1.63), fibrates (aOR 2.35, 95% CI 1.90-2.90), and phosphorous binders (aOR 2.85, 95% CI 1.80-4.50). Patterns were similar after adjustment for first-year estimated glomerular filtration rate, except the association with phosphorous binders was no longer significant. Cyclosporine-based ISx was associated with more common erythropoiesis-stimulating agent use, including after estimated glomerular filtration rate adjustment (aOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.24-2.10). Compared to those who were being administered triple ISx, recipients receiving tacrolimus-based dual and monotherapies had lower use of statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACEi/ARBs), and antibacterial agents. Recipients of steroid-free ISx were less commonly treated for post-transplantation diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS: Alternate ISx regimens are associated with varying treatment requirements for hematologic, metabolic. and infectious complications. Comedication use should be considered in the cost-effectiveness and individualization of ISx regimens.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26915843      PMCID: PMC4950501          DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.12.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  11 in total

1.  Coding accuracy of administrative drug claims in the Ontario Drug Benefit database.

Authors:  Adrian R Levy; Bernie J O'Brien; Connie Sellors; Paul Grootendorst; Donald Willison
Journal:  Can J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003

2.  Mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplantation: 3-year results from the placebo-controlled trial. European Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Validation of pharmacy records in drug exposure assessment.

Authors:  H S Lau; A de Boer; K S Beuning; A Porsius
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  The implications of acute rejection for allograft survival in contemporary U.S. kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Krista L Lentine; Adrian Gheorghian; David Axelrod; Anu Kalsekar; Gilbert L'italien; Mark A Schnitzler
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Sirolimus interferes with iron homeostasis in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Annamaria Maiorano; Giovanni Stallone; Antonio Schena; Barbara Infante; Paola Pontrelli; Francesco Paolo Schena; Giuseppe Grandaliano
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  New-onset diabetes mellitus in kidney transplant recipients discharged on steroid-free immunosuppression.

Authors:  Fu L Luan; Diane E Steffick; Akinlolu O Ojo
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Effects of sirolimus on plasma lipids, lipoprotein levels, and fatty acid metabolism in renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Joel D Morrisett; Ghada Abdel-Fattah; Ron Hoogeveen; Eddie Mitchell; Christie M Ballantyne; Henry J Pownall; Antone R Opekun; Jonathon S Jaffe; Suzanne Oppermann; Barry D Kahan
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.922

8.  Use of cardioprotective medications in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  R S Gaston; B L Kasiske; A M Fieberg; R Leduc; F C Cosio; S Gourishankar; P Halloran; L Hunsicker; D Rush; A J Matas
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Pharmacoepidemiology of anemia in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Reshma Kewalramani; Mark Rutstein; Steven Gabardi; Tania Vonvisger; Anil Chandraker
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 10.121

10.  Weight change and serum lipoproteins in recipients of renal allografts.

Authors:  J E Gonyea; C F Anderson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 7.616

View more
  1 in total

1.  Use of Statins in Kidney Transplant Recipients in Norway.

Authors:  Marit Rønning; Vidar Hjellvik; Solveig Sakshaug; Hege Salvesen Blix; Karsten Midtvedt; Anna Varberg Reisæter; Hallvard Holdaas; Anders Åsberg
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.