| Literature DB >> 26915662 |
Xuefeng Qi1, Dan Tan2, Chengqi Wu3, Chao Tang4, Tao Li5, Xueying Han6, Jing Wang7, Caihong Liu8, Ruiqiao Li9, Jingyu Wang10.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the mechanism by which H9N2 avian influenza virus (AIV) affects eggshell quality. Thirty-week-old specific pathogen free egg-laying hens were inoculated with the chicken-origin H9N2 AIV strain (A/Chicken/shaanxi/01/2011) or with inoculating media without virus by combined intraocular and intranasal routes. The time course for the appearance of viral antigen and tissue lesions in the oviduct was coincident with the adverse changes in egg production in the infected hens. The viral loads of AIV have a close correlation with the changes in the uterus CaBP-D28k mRNA expression as well as the Ca concentrations in the eggshells in the infected hens from 1 to 7 days post inoculation (dpi). Ultrastructural examination of eggshells showed significantly decreased shell thickness in the infected hens from 1 to 5 dpi (P < 0.05). Furthermore, obvious changes in the structure of the external shell surface and shell membrane were detected in the infected hens from 1 to 5 dpi as compared with the control hens. In conclusion, this study confirmed that H9N2 AIV strain (A/Chicken/shaanxi/01/2011) infection is associated with severe lesions of the uterus and abnormal expression of CaBP-D28k mRNA in the uteri of the infected hens. The change of CaBP-D28k mRNA expression may contribute to the deterioration of the eggshell quality of the laying hens infected with AIV. It is noteworthy that the pathogenicity of H9N2 AIV strains may vary depending on the virus strain and host preference.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26915662 PMCID: PMC4766683 DOI: 10.1186/s13567-016-0322-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Res ISSN: 0928-4249 Impact factor: 3.683
Figure 1Viral loads in the oviducts of H9N2 subtype avian influenza virus (AIV) infected laying hens. Kinetics of virus load of H9N2 subtype AIV in the oviducts of laying hens infected with H9N2 subtype AIV strain using quantitative real-time PCR. Each time point represents the mean viral genome copies per 0.1 g of tissues ±SEM obtained from five hens.
Figure 2Histopathologic changes and the location of virus antigen in the magnum and uterus of hens infected with H9N2 subtype AIV. Histopathologic changes of the magnum and uterus in control and AIV-infected groups on day 5 post inoculation was observed by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (400×). (a) degeneration and necrocytosis of mucosal epithelial cell layer; (b) glands edema or dissolved; (c) infiltration of lymphocytes. Nuclei of the tissue sections from control and infected hens were stained with Hoechst 33342: red colour fluorescence indicates the positive staining of virus NP proteins. Scale bar = 50 µm.
Figure 3The expression of CaBP-D28k gene in the uterus of laying hens at different time points post inoculation with AIV. Analysis of CaBP-D28k mRNA expression in the uterus of laying hens at the indicated days post inoculation with AIV using quantitative RT-PCR. Columns and vertical bars represent the mean ± SEM from five independent experiments. Bars with different superscript letters represent a significant difference (P < 0.05).
Figure 4Analysis of the content of calcium in the eggshell of laying hens at different times post inoculation with AIV. Analysis of the content of calcium in the eggshell of laying hens at the indicated days post inoculation with AIV using flame atomic spectrophotometry. Columns and vertical bars represent the mean ± SEM from five independent experiments. Bars with different superscript letters represent a significant difference (P < 0.05).
Figure 5Scanning electron microscopy of the cross section of the eggshells from laying hens at different times post inoculation with H9N2 AIV. Representative scanning electron microscopy photograph of the cross section of the eggshell in the control group (A) and AIV-infected group at 1~7 dpi (B–F) as well as analysis of the eggshell thickness (G) in laying hens at the indicated days post inoculation with AIV. Columns and vertical bars represent the mean ± SEM from five independent experiments. Bars with different superscript letters represent a significant difference (P < 0.05). Scale bar = 100 µm.
Figure 6Scanning electron microscopy of the inner and outer surface of the eggshells of laying hens at different times post inoculation with AIV. Representative scanning electron microscopy photograph of the outer (A–F) and inner surface (G–L) of the eggshells from the control hens (A, G) and in hens at 1~7 days post inoculation with AIV (B–F, H–L).