Literature DB >> 26915304

Birth Plans: What Matters for Birth Experience Satisfaction.

Jenny Y Mei1, Yalda Afshar2, Kimberly D Gregory2, Sarah J Kilpatrick2, Tania F Esakoff2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To categorize individual birth plan requests and determine if number of requests and request fulfillment is associated with birth experience satisfaction.
METHODS: This is a sub-analysis of a prospective cohort study of 302 women with singleton pregnancies with and without birth plans. Women with a hard copy of their birth plans who completed a postdelivery satisfaction survey were included in this study. We described the number and type of birth plan requests and associated the number of requests and request fulfillment with overall satisfaction, expectations met, and sense of control. Differences between groups were analyzed using chi-square, Spearman rank correlation, and logistic regression.
RESULTS: One hundred and nine women presented to Labor and Delivery with a hard copy of their prewritten birth plan. We identified 23 unique requests. The most common requests were no intravenous analgesia (82%) and exclusive breastfeeding (74%). The requests most fulfilled were avoidance of episiotomy (100%) and no operative vaginal delivery (89%). Having a higher number of requests fulfilled correlated with greater overall satisfaction (p = 0.03), higher chance of expectations being met (p < 0.01), and feeling more in control (p < 0.01). Having a high number of requests was associated with an 80 percent reduction in overall satisfaction with the birth experience (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Having a higher number of requests fulfilled was positively associated with birth experience satisfaction, while having a high number of requests was inversely associated with birth experience satisfaction. Further research is needed to understand how to improve birth plan-related birth experience satisfaction.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth experience satisfaction; birth plans

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26915304     DOI: 10.1111/birt.12226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  12 in total

1.  The Development of a Conceptual Framework and Preliminary Item Bank for Childbirth-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Lisa M Korst; Moshe Fridman; Samia Saeb; Naomi Greene; Arlene Fink; Kimberly D Gregory
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Online Birth Plans and Anticipatory Guidance: A Critical Review Using Web Analytics and Crowdsourcing.

Authors:  Christina D Yarrington; Kari Radoff; Chloe A Zera
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2018

3.  Hopes expressed in birth plans by women diagnosed with fetal anomalies: a qualitative study in Japan.

Authors:  Maki Kitazono Chiba; Shigeko Horiuchi; Satomi Ishikawa; Naoko Arimori
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-10-23       Impact factor: 3.105

4.  Birth plan compliance and its relation to maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Pedro Hidalgo-Lopezosa; María Hidalgo-Maestre; Maria Aurora Rodríguez-Borrego
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2017-12-11

5.  What are the Critical Elements of Satisfaction and Experience in Labor and Childbirth-A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Barbara Baranowska; Anna Kajdy; Paulina Pawlicka; Ernest Pokropek; Michał Rabijewski; Dorota Sys; Artur Pokropek
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Association between Birth Plan Use and Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Southern Spain: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Pedro Hidalgo-Lopezosa; Ana María Cubero-Luna; Andrea Jiménez-Ruz; María Hidalgo-Maestre; María Aurora Rodríguez-Borrego; Pablo Jesús López-Soto
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Birth plan presentation to hospitals and its relation to obstetric outcomes and selected pain relief methods during childbirth.

Authors:  Encarnación López-Gimeno; Gemma Falguera-Puig; Mª Mercedes Vicente-Hernández; Meritxell Angelet; Griselda Vázquez Garreta; Gloria Seguranyes
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  When birth is not as expected: a systematic review of the impact of a mismatch between expectations and experiences.

Authors:  Rebecca Webb; Susan Ayers; Annick Bogaerts; Ljiljana Jeličić; Paulina Pawlicka; Sarah Van Haeken; Nazihah Uddin; Rita Borg Xuereb; Natalija Kolesnikova
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Women's motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Martine Hollander; Esteriek de Miranda; Jeroen van Dillen; Irene de Graaf; Frank Vandenbussche; Lianne Holten
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Evaluation of the birth plan implementation: a parallel convergent mixed study.

Authors:  Parivash Ahmadpour; Sanaz Mosavi; Sakineh Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi; Shayesteh Jahanfar; Mojgan Mirghafourvand
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.