Literature DB >> 26915292

SynTarget: an online tool to test the synergetic effect of genes on survival outcome in cancer.

I Amelio1, P O Tsvetkov2,3, R A Knight1, A Lisitsa4, G Melino1,5,6, A V Antonov1,6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26915292      PMCID: PMC4832110          DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2016.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Death Differ        ISSN: 1350-9047            Impact factor:   15.828


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, The identification of target combinations with synergistic effects on cancer is at the leading edge of modern cancer research, especially for the development of combined anticancer therapies.[1] However, at present, the basis for selection of beneficial target combinations commonly relies on expert opinion without any systematic rationale. The development of high-throughput technologies has led to the availability of large-scale clinical gene expression data sets.[2, 3, 4] Mining of these data sets for identification of gene combinations with synergetic effects on survival outcome in cancer could provide a systematic rationale for the identification of target combinations with potential therapeutic synergy. Multiple online tools have been developed recently to assess the relationship between expression of a single gene and clinical outcome across a variety of cancers.[5, 6] Here we present SynTarget, the first tool able to test the cumulative effect of two genes on survival outcome and, therefore, can identify gene pairs with synergistic effects. At present, SynTarget is based on 15 large-scale gene expression data sets covering eight different cancers with the possibility to select clinically important subtypes (i.e., triple-negative, p53 mutated cancers, K-ras mutated cancers etc.). On submission, the user selects a specific cancer data set and subtype and specifies two genes. Patients in the selected data set (subtype) are split into four groups with respect to the expression of the specified genes (high−high, high−low, low−high and low−low). Next, each group is tested versus other samples to find any statistical differences in survival outcome (i.e., high−high versus others, high−low versus others and so on). This information is accompanied by individual-gene survival effects in order to understand the degree of gene synergy. Among other drug classes, immunotherapeutic agents have enormous potential for synergistic combinations.[1] Triple-negative breast cancer is the subtype with the worst prognosis among all breast cancer subtypes, with currently no known molecular targets.[7] We used SynTarget to search cell surface genes with the synergistic potential on survival, whose high expression leads to significantly negative prognosis. For example, ADAM9 is a membrane-anchored protein and has been implicated in a variety of biological processes, as well as being involved in cancer metastasis. RC3H2 is a membrane-associated nucleic acid-binding protein. High expression of both genes individually was slightly negatively associated (P-values ~0.07 and 0.04) with survival in triple-negative patients from the METABRIC data set.[3] The subgroup of triple-negative patients where both genes are highly expressed has a significantly negative shift (P-value<6e−05) in survival, in comparison with other patients (see Supplementary Materials for details). Therefore, SynTarget provides statistical evidence that high expression of both RC3H2 and ADAM9 synergistically affects survival of patients with triple-negative breast cancer. In summary, SynTarget supports the need of biomedical researchers to estimate the synergy of gene expression on survival of cancer patients. To our knowledge this is a first tool of this kind and, as shown by several examples (see Supplementary Materials), SynTarget can be used for fast validation of the clinical synergy for two genes. SynTarget is incorporated into BioProfiling.de, an analytical portal for high-throughput cell biology,[8] and is freely available at http://www.bioprofiling.de/synergy2G.
  8 in total

1.  An online survival analysis tool to rapidly assess the effect of 22,277 genes on breast cancer prognosis using microarray data of 1,809 patients.

Authors:  Balazs Györffy; Andras Lanczky; Aron C Eklund; Carsten Denkert; Jan Budczies; Qiyuan Li; Zoltan Szallasi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Emerging targeted therapies in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  J Crown; J O'Shaughnessy; G Gullo
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 3.  Evolving synergistic combinations of targeted immunotherapies to combat cancer.

Authors:  Ignacio Melero; David M Berman; M Angela Aznar; Alan J Korman; José Luis Pérez Gracia; John Haanen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  PPISURV: a novel bioinformatics tool for uncovering the hidden role of specific genes in cancer survival outcome.

Authors:  A V Antonov; M Krestyaninova; R A Knight; I Rodchenkov; G Melino; N A Barlev
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups.

Authors:  Christina Curtis; Sohrab P Shah; Suet-Feung Chin; Gulisa Turashvili; Oscar M Rueda; Mark J Dunning; Doug Speed; Andy G Lynch; Shamith Samarajiwa; Yinyin Yuan; Stefan Gräf; Gavin Ha; Gholamreza Haffari; Ali Bashashati; Roslin Russell; Steven McKinney; Anita Langerød; Andrew Green; Elena Provenzano; Gordon Wishart; Sarah Pinder; Peter Watson; Florian Markowetz; Leigh Murphy; Ian Ellis; Arnie Purushotham; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; James D Brenton; Simon Tavaré; Carlos Caldas; Samuel Aparicio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  BioProfiling.de: analytical web portal for high-throughput cell biology.

Authors:  Alexey V Antonov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  DRUGSURV: a resource for repositioning of approved and experimental drugs in oncology based on patient survival information.

Authors:  I Amelio; M Gostev; R A Knight; A E Willis; G Melino; A V Antonov
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 8.469

  8 in total
  31 in total

1.  Angiopoietin pathway gene expression associated with poor breast cancer survival.

Authors:  Rajesh Ramanathan; Amy L Olex; Mikhail Dozmorov; Harry D Bear; Leopoldo Jose Fernandez; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Stearoyl-CoA-desaturase 1 regulates lung cancer stemness via stabilization and nuclear localization of YAP/TAZ.

Authors:  A Noto; C De Vitis; M E Pisanu; G Roscilli; G Ricci; A Catizone; G Sorrentino; G Chianese; O Taglialatela-Scafati; D Trisciuoglio; D Del Bufalo; M Di Martile; A Di Napoli; L Ruco; S Costantini; Z Jakopin; A Budillon; G Melino; G Del Sal; G Ciliberto; R Mancini
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Co-expression of RelA/p65 and ACTN4 induces apoptosis in non-small lung carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Ekaterina Lomert; Lidia Turoverova; Daria Kriger; Nikolai D Aksenov; Alina D Nikotina; Alexey Petukhov; Alexey G Mittenberg; Nikolai V Panyushev; Mikhail Khotin; Kirill Volkov; Nikolai A Barlev; Dmitri Tentler
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  BMP6-induced modulation of the tumor micro-milieu.

Authors:  David Stieglitz; Susanne Lamm; Simone Braig; Lena Feuerer; Silke Kuphal; Peter Dietrich; Stephanie Arndt; Bernd Echtenacher; Claus Hellerbrand; Sigrid Karrer; Anja-Katrin Bosserhoff
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Orphan receptor NR4A3 is a novel target of p53 that contributes to apoptosis.

Authors:  Olga Fedorova; Alexey Petukhov; Alexandra Daks; Oleg Shuvalov; Tatyana Leonova; Elena Vasileva; Nikolai Aksenov; Gerry Melino; Nikolai A Barlev
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  PLK1 and NOTCH Positively Correlate in Melanoma and Their Combined Inhibition Results in Synergistic Modulations of Key Melanoma Pathways.

Authors:  Shengqin Su; Gagan Chhabra; Mary A Ndiaye; Chandra K Singh; Ting Ye; Wei Huang; Colin N Dewey; Vijayasaradhi Setaluri; Nihal Ahmad
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 6.009

7.  Combined effects of PLK1 and RAS in hepatocellular carcinoma reveal rigosertib as promising novel therapeutic "dual-hit" option.

Authors:  Peter Dietrich; Kim Freese; Abdo Mahli; Wolfgang Erwin Thasler; Claus Hellerbrand; Anja Katrin Bosserhoff
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-11

8.  A Polysome-Based microRNA Screen Identifies miR-24-3p as a Novel Promigratory miRNA in Mesothelioma.

Authors:  Stefania Oliveto; Roberta Alfieri; Annarita Miluzio; Alessandra Scagliola; Raissa S Secli; Pierluigi Gasparini; Stefano Grosso; Luciano Cascione; Luciano Mutti; Stefano Biffo
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  The RNA-binding protein HuR is a novel target of Pirh2 E3 ubiquitin ligase.

Authors:  Alexandra Daks; Alexey Petukhov; Olga Fedorova; Oleg Shuvalov; Alena Kizenko; Elizaveta Tananykina; Elena Vasileva; Oleg Semenov; Andrew Bottrill; Nickolai Barlev
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 8.469

10.  MicroRNA pharmacogenomics based integrated model of miR-17-92 cluster in sorafenib resistant HCC cells reveals a strategy to forestall drug resistance.

Authors:  Faryal Mehwish Awan; Anam Naz; Ayesha Obaid; Aqsa Ikram; Amjad Ali; Jamil Ahmad; Abdul Khaliq Naveed; Hussnain Ahmed Janjua
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.