| Literature DB >> 26914405 |
Christopher John Hunt1, Valentina Piccoli2, Andrea Carnaghi2, Lisa Di Blas2, Mauro Bianchi3, Loredana Hvastja-Stefani2, Giovanna Maria Pelamatti2, Corrado Cavallero2.
Abstract
Homophobic epithets have become commonly used insults among adolescents. However, evidence suggests that there are differences in how these homophobic epithets are evaluated based on beliefs held by the observer and the context in which they are used. To examine this, Italian high school students were asked to rate the offensiveness of homophobic epithets, as well as to consider how they or others would react to homophobic epithets across various situations. Homophobic beliefs and beliefs about the social acceptability of homophobic epithets were also examined. It was found that greater perceived social acceptability of homophobic epithets was related to dismissive reactions to their use, whereas homophobic beliefs were predictive of negative emotional reactions but in varying ways depending on the specific context. The results indicate that homophobic epithets may not always be perceived as homophobic by adolescents, and that attempts to alter the social acceptability of these insults may be an effective manner of reducing their use.Keywords: Gay men; homophobia; offensiveness; slurs; social acceptability; verbal insults
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26914405 DOI: 10.1080/00918369.2016.1158000
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Homosex ISSN: 0091-8369