Literature DB >> 26914284

Analgesia by telemedically supported paramedics compared with physician-administered analgesia: A prospective, interventional, multicentre trial.

J C Brokmann1, R Rossaint2, F Hirsch2, S K Beckers2, M Czaplik2, M Chowanetz2, M Tamm3, S Bergrath2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In German emergency medical services (EMS), the analgesia is restricted to physicians. In this prospective, interventional, multicentre trial, complications with and quality of telemedically delegated analgesia were evaluated.
METHODS: If prehospital analgesia was necessary, five telemedically equipped paramedic ambulances from four different districts could consult a telemedicine centre. Analgesics were delegated based on a predefined algorithm. Telemedically assisted cases were compared with local historical regular EMS missions using matched pairs. The primary outcome was the frequency of therapeutic complications (respiratory/circulatory insufficiency, allergic reactions). Secondary outcomes were quality of analgesia (11-point numerical rating scale, NRS) and the frequency of nausea/vomiting.
RESULTS: Analgesia was necessary in 106 telemedically assisted missions. In 23 cases, the telemedical procedure was used until an EMS physician arrived. Of the remaining 83 cases, 80 could be matched to comparable controls. Complications did not occur in either the study group or the control group (0 vs. 0; p = N/A). Complete NRS documentation was noted in 65/80 (study group) and 32/80 (control group) cases (p < 0.0001). Adequate initial pain reduction (quality indicator: reduction of NRS ≥ 2 points or NRS < 5 at end of mission) occurred in 61/65 versus 31/32 cases (p = 1.0); NRS reduction during mission was 3.78 ± 2.0 versus 4.38 ± 2.2 points (p = 0.0159). Nausea and vomiting occurred with equal frequency in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Telemedical delegation of analgesics to paramedics was safe and led to a pain reduction superior to the published minimum standard in both groups. The documentation quality was better in the telemedicine group. WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD?: Little is known about the safety and quality of prehospital analgesia carried out by emergency medical services (EMS). Beside potential quality problems, in some countries meaningful pain reduction is limited by legal regulations that allow only physicians to administer analgesics. This first multicentre prospective trial for telemedically delegated analgesia demonstrates that remote analgesia is possible and safe and retains equivalent analgesic quality compared with that administered by onsite EMS physicians.
© 2016 European Pain Federation - EFIC®

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26914284     DOI: 10.1002/ejp.843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pain        ISSN: 1090-3801            Impact factor:   3.931


  15 in total

Review 1.  [Tele-emergency physician : New care concept in emergency medicine].

Authors:  Viola Koncz; Thorsten Kohlmann; Stefan Bielmeier; Bert Urban; Stephan Prückner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Analgesia for trauma patients in emergency medicine].

Authors:  D Häske; B W Böttiger; B Bouillon; M Fischer; Gernot Gaier; B Gliwitzky; M Helm; P Hilbert-Carius; B Hossfeld; B Schempf; A Wafaisade; M Bernhard
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  [Development of ground-based physician-staffed emergency missions in the city of Leipzig from 2003 to 2013].

Authors:  K Bader; M Bernhard; A Gries; M Kaul; R Schröder; A Ramshorn-Zimmer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  [Prehospital analgesia by emergency physicians and paramedics : Comparison of effectiveness].

Authors:  B Schempf; S Casu; D Häske
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Blood pressure management and guideline adherence in hypertensive emergencies and urgencies: A comparison between telemedically supported and conventional out-of-hospital care.

Authors:  Jörg C Brokmann; Rolf Rossaint; Michael Müller; Christina Fitzner; Luigi Villa; Stefan K Beckers; Sebastian Bergrath
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Implementation of a full-scale prehospital telemedicine system: evaluation of the process and systemic effects in a pre-post intervention study.

Authors:  Sebastian Bergrath; Jörg Christian Brokmann; Stefan Beckers; Marc Felzen; Michael Czaplik; Rolf Rossaint
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome by Telemedically Supported Paramedics Compared With Physician-Based Treatment: A Prospective, Interventional, Multicenter Trial.

Authors:  Jörg C Brokmann; Clemens Conrad; Rolf Rossaint; Sebastian Bergrath; Stefan K Beckers; Miriam Tamm; Michael Czaplik; Frederik Hirsch
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Quality of analgesia in physician-operated telemedical prehospital emergency care is comparable to physician-based prehospital care - a retrospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Niklas Lenssen; Andreas Krockauer; Stefan K Beckers; Rolf Rossaint; Frederik Hirsch; Jörg C Brokmann; Sebastian Bergrath
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Tele-EMS physicians improve life-threatening conditions during prehospital emergency missions.

Authors:  Hanna Schröder; Stefan K Beckers; Klaudia Ogrodzki; Christina Borgs; Sebastian Ziemann; Andreas Follmann; Rolf Rossaint; Marc Felzen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Nurse-Administered Analgesic Treatment in Italian Emergency Medical Services: A Nationwide Survey.

Authors:  Guglielmo Imbriaco; Riccardo Rondelli; Federica Maroni; Selene Mazzolani; Silvia Sasso; Stefano Sebastiani; Boaz Gedaliahu Samolsky Dekel
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.