Literature DB >> 26914093

Soil respiration contributes substantially to urban carbon fluxes in the greater Boston area.

Stephen M Decina1, Lucy R Hutyra2, Conor K Gately3, Jackie M Getson4, Andrew B Reinmann5, Anne G Short Gianotti6, Pamela H Templer7.   

Abstract

Urban areas are the dominant source of U.S. fossil fuel carbon dioxide (FFCO2) emissions. In the absence of binding international treaties or decisive U.S. federal policy for greenhouse gas regulation, cities have also become leaders in greenhouse gas reduction efforts through climate action plans. These plans focus on anthropogenic carbon flows only, however, ignoring a potentially substantial contribution to atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations from biological respiration. Our aim was to measure the contribution of CO2 efflux from soil respiration to atmospheric CO2 fluxes using an automated CO2 efflux system and to use these measurements to model urban soil CO2 efflux across an urban area. We find that growing season soil respiration is dramatically enhanced in urban areas and represents levels of CO2 efflux of up to 72% of FFCO2 within greater Boston's residential areas, and that soils in urban forests, lawns, and landscaped cover types emit 2.62 ± 0.15, 4.49 ± 0.14, and 6.73 ± 0.26 μmolCO2 m(-2) s(-1), respectively, during the growing season. These rates represent up to 2.2 times greater soil respiration than rates found in nearby rural ecosystems in central Massachusetts (MA), a potential consequence of imported carbon amendments, such as mulch, within a general regime of landowner management. As the scientific community moves rapidly towards monitoring, reporting, and verification of CO2 emissions using ground based approaches and remotely-sensed observations to measure CO2 concentrations, our results show that measurement and modeling of biogenic urban CO2 fluxes will be a critical component for verification of urban climate action plans.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biogeochemistry; CO(2) flux; Fossil fuels; Urban ecology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26914093     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  6 in total

1.  Live fast, die young: Accelerated growth, mortality, and turnover in street trees.

Authors:  Ian A Smith; Victoria K Dearborn; Lucy R Hutyra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Building houses and managing lawns could limit yard soil carbon for centuries.

Authors:  Morgan E Peach; Laura A Ogden; Eleni A Mora; Andrew J Friedland
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2019-08-16

3.  Influence of landscape management practices on urban greenhouse gas budgets.

Authors:  Wiley J Hundertmark; Marissa Lee; Ian A Smith; Ashley H Y Bang; Vivien Chen; Conor K Gately; Pamela H Templer; Lucy R Hutyra
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2021-01-07

4.  Heavy metal load and effects on biochemical properties in urban soils of a medium-sized city, Ancona, Italy.

Authors:  Dominique Serrani; Franco Ajmone-Marsan; Giuseppe Corti; Stefania Cocco; Valeria Cardelli; Paola Adamo
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.898

Review 5.  Carbon Sequestration in Turfgrass-Soil Systems.

Authors:  Ruying Wang; Clint M Mattox; Claire L Phillips; Alec R Kowalewski
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-22

6.  Biodegradation of Some Organic Materials in Soils and Soil Constructions: Experiments, Modeling and Prevention.

Authors:  Andrey V Smagin; Nadezhda B Sadovnikova; Vyacheslav I Vasenev; Marina V Smagina
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.