Literature DB >> 26913997

Validation of dose painting of lung tumours using alanine/EPR dosimetry.

Ingerid Skjei Knudtsen1, Jørund Graadal Svestad, Erlend Peter Skaug Sande, Bernt Louni Rekstad, Jan Rødal, Wouter van Elmpt, Michel Öllers, Eli Olaug Hole, Eirik Malinen.   

Abstract

Biologic image guided radiotherapy (RT) with escalated doses to tumour sub volumes challenges today's RT dose planning and delivery systems. In this phantom study, we verify the capability of a clinical dose planning and delivery system to deliver an 18F-FDG-PET based dose painted treatment plan to a lung tumour. Furthermore, we estimate the uncertainties of the dose painted treatment compared to conventional RT plans. An anthropomorphic thorax phantom of polystyrene and polyurethane was constructed based on CT images of a lung cancer patient. 101 EPR/alanine dosimeters were placed in separate cavities within the phantom. IMRT and VMAT plans were generated in Eclipse (version 10.0, Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm version 10.2.28, Varian Medical Systems, Inc.) for 6 and 15 MV photons, based on 18F-FDG-PET/CT images of the patient. A boost dose of 3.8 Gy/fraction was given to the 18F-FDG-avid region (biological planning volume; BTV), whereas 3.1 Gy/fraction was planned to the planning target volume (PTV, excluding the BTV). For the homogenous plans, 3.2 Gy/fraction was given to the PTV. Irradiation of the phantom was carried out at a Varian Trilogy linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems, Inc.). Uncertainties involved in treatment planning and delivery were estimated from portal dosimetry gamma evaluation. Measured and calculated doses were compared by Bland-Altmann analysis. For all treatment plans, all dose-volume objectives could be achieved in the treatment planning system. The mean absolute differences between calculated and measured doses were small (<0.1 Gy) for BTV, PTV-BTV, lung and soft tissue. The estimated uncertainty of the planned doses was less than 3% for all plans, whereas the estimated uncertainty in the measured doses was less 2.3%. Our results show that planning and delivery of dose escalated lung cancer treatment on a clinical dose planning and delivery system has high dosimetric accuracy. The uncertainties associated with the dose escalated treatment plans are comparable to the conventional plans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26913997     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/6/2243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  2 in total

1.  Characterization of phenolic pellets for ESR dosimetry in photon beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Salvatore Gallo; Giuseppina Iacoviello; Salvatore Panzeca; Ivan Veronese; Antonio Bartolotta; Daniele Dondi; Anna Maria Gueli; Gianfranco Loi; Anna Longo; Eleonora Mones; Maurizio Marrale
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Positron emission tomography guided dose painting by numbers of lung cancer: Alanine dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom.

Authors:  Iosif Papoutsis; Ingerid Skjei Knudtsen; Erlend Peter Skaug Sande; Bernt Louni Rekstad; Michel Öllers; Wouter van Elmpt; Marius Røthe Arnesen; Eirik Malinen
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-02-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.