| Literature DB >> 26913863 |
Jesper H Andersen1, Jukka Aroviita2, Jacob Carstensen3, Nikolai Friberg4, Richard K Johnson5, Pirkko Kauppila6, Mats Lindegarth7, Ciarán Murray3, Karl Norling8.
Abstract
We review approaches and tools currently used in Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden) for integrated assessment of 'ecological status' sensu the EU Water Framework Directive as well as assessment of 'eutrophication status' in coastal and marine waters. Integration principles for combining indicators within biological quality elements (BQEs) and combining BQEs into a final-integrated assessment are discussed. Specific focus has been put on combining different types of information into indices, since several methods are currently employed. As a consequence of the variety of methods used, comparisons across both BQEs and water categories (river, lakes and coastal waters) can be difficult. Based on our analyses, we conclude that some principles and methods for integration can be critical and that a harmonised approach should be developed. Further, we conclude that the integration principles applied within BQEs are critical and in need of harmonisation if we want a better understanding of potential transition in ecological status between surface water types, e.g. when riverine water enters a downstream lake or coastal water body.Keywords: Assessment; Biological quality elements; Coastal eutrophication; Ecological status; Integration; Water Framework Directive
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26913863 PMCID: PMC5012994 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-016-0767-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ambio ISSN: 0044-7447 Impact factor: 5.129