Literature DB >> 2691365

Comparative methods for examining adaptation depend on evolutionary models.

M D Pagel1, P H Harvey.   

Abstract

Comparisons among taxa provide a powerful means for helping to understand why primate species differ from each other in morphology, behaviour and life history. Comparative tests can also mislead when not applied correctly, and correct application means taking into account the phylogenetic relationships among the species being compared. Adaptation is defined as a comparative concept. The reasons for phenotypic similarity among closely related taxa are summarized. Different models of evolutionary change dictate different methods for reconstructing ancestral character states and for performing comparative analyses on categorical and continuously varying character. All comparative methods rely either implicitly of explicitly on some model of how evolution proceeds. The choice of a particular method of analysis is, therefore, an implicit choice of a model of evolution.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2691365     DOI: 10.1159/000156417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Folia Primatol (Basel)        ISSN: 0015-5713            Impact factor:   1.246


  12 in total

1.  Sexual size dimorphism in anurans.

Authors:  Jean-Matthieu Monnet; Michael I Cherry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The adaptive significance of unproductive alternative splicing in primates.

Authors:  Adonis Skandalis; Mark Frampton; Jon Seger; Miriam H Richards
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 4.942

3.  Warm-up rates during arousal from torpor in heterothermic mammals: physiological correlates and a comparison with heterothermic insects.

Authors:  G N Stone; A Purvis
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.200

Review 4.  Controlling for non-independence in comparative analysis of patterns across populations within species.

Authors:  Graham N Stone; Sean Nee; Joseph Felsenstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  A community-level evaluation of the impact of prey behavioural and ecological characteristics on predator diet composition.

Authors:  Susanne Shultz; Ronald Noë; W Scott McGraw; R I M Dunbar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Inferring ancestral states without assuming neutrality or gradualism using a stable model of continuous character evolution.

Authors:  Michael G Elliot; Arne Ø Mooers
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  ProtParCon: A Framework for Processing Molecular Data and Identifying Parallel and Convergent Amino Acid Replacements.

Authors:  Fei Yuan; Hoa Nguyen; Dan Graur
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Diversity of nectar amino acids in the Fritillaria (Liliaceae) genus: ecological and evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Katarzyna Roguz; Andrzej Bajguz; Magdalena Chmur; Agnieszka Gołębiewska; Agata Roguz; Marcin Zych
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Rubisco Adaptation Is More Limited by Phylogenetic Constraint Than by Catalytic Trade-off.

Authors:  Jacques W Bouvier; David M Emms; Timothy Rhodes; Jai S Bolton; Amelia Brasnett; Alice Eddershaw; Jochem R Nielsen; Anastasia Unitt; Spencer M Whitney; Steven Kelly
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  The evolution of "egalitarian" and "despotic" social systems among macaques.

Authors:  S Matsumura
Journal:  Primates       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.