Literature DB >> 26913191

BioShaDock: a community driven bioinformatics shared Docker-based tools registry.

François Moreews1, Olivier Sallou2, Hervé Ménager3, Yvan Le Bras2, Cyril Monjeaud2, Christophe Blanchet2, Olivier Collin4.   

Abstract

Linux container technologies, as represented by Docker, provide an alternative to complex and time-consuming installation processes needed for scientific software. The ease of deployment and the process isolation they enable, as well as the reproducibility they permit across environments and versions, are among the qualities that make them interesting candidates for the construction of bioinformatic infrastructures, at any scale from single workstations to high throughput computing architectures. The Docker Hub is a public registry which can be used to distribute bioinformatic software as Docker images. However, its lack of curation and its genericity make it difficult for a bioinformatics user to find the most appropriate images needed. BioShaDock is a bioinformatics-focused Docker registry, which provides a local and fully controlled environment to build and publish bioinformatic software as portable Docker images. It provides a number of improvements over the base Docker registry on authentication and permissions management, that enable its integration in existing bioinformatic infrastructures such as computing platforms. The metadata associated with the registered images are domain-centric, including for instance concepts defined in the EDAM ontology, a shared and structured vocabulary of commonly used terms in bioinformatics. The registry also includes user defined tags to facilitate its discovery, as well as a link to the tool description in the ELIXIR registry if it already exists. If it does not, the BioShaDock registry will synchronize with the registry to create a new description in the Elixir registry, based on the BioShaDock entry metadata. This link will help users get more information on the tool such as its EDAM operations, input and output types. This allows integration with the ELIXIR Tools and Data Services Registry, thus providing the appropriate visibility of such images to the bioinformatics community.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioinformatics; community driven registry; container; deployment; docker; interoperability; maintainability

Year:  2015        PMID: 26913191      PMCID: PMC4743153          DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.7536.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  F1000Res        ISSN: 2046-1402


  11 in total

1.  Open science is a research accelerator.

Authors:  Michael Woelfle; Piero Olliaro; Matthew H Todd
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 24.427

2.  Toward effective software solutions for big biology.

Authors:  Pjotr Prins; Joep de Ligt; Artem Tarasov; Ritsert C Jansen; Edwin Cuppen; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 3.  Open source tools and toolkits for bioinformatics: significance, and where are we?

Authors:  Jason E Stajich; Hilmar Lapp
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences.

Authors:  Jeremy Goecks; Anton Nekrutenko; James Taylor
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 13.583

5.  The impact of Docker containers on the performance of genomic pipelines.

Authors:  Paolo Di Tommaso; Emilio Palumbo; Maria Chatzou; Pablo Prieto; Michael L Heuer; Cedric Notredame
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Bioboxes: standardised containers for interchangeable bioinformatics software.

Authors:  Peter Belmann; Johannes Dröge; Andreas Bremges; Alice C McHardy; Alexander Sczyrba; Michael D Barton
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 6.524

7.  Engineering bioinformatics: building reliability, performance and productivity into bioinformatics software.

Authors:  Brendan Lawlor; Paul Walsh
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.269

8.  EDAM: an ontology of bioinformatics operations, types of data and identifiers, topics and formats.

Authors:  Jon Ison; Matús Kalas; Inge Jonassen; Dan Bolser; Mahmut Uludag; Hamish McWilliam; James Malone; Rodrigo Lopez; Steve Pettifer; Peter Rice
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  PyPedia: using the wiki paradigm as crowd sourcing environment for bioinformatics protocols.

Authors:  Alexandros Kanterakis; Joël Kuiper; George Potamias; Morris A Swertz
Journal:  Source Code Biol Med       Date:  2015-11-19

10.  Dissemination of scientific software with Galaxy ToolShed.

Authors:  Daniel Blankenberg; Gregory Von Kuster; Emil Bouvier; Dannon Baker; Enis Afgan; Nicholas Stoler; James Taylor; Anton Nekrutenko
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  17 in total

1.  Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows.

Authors:  Paolo Di Tommaso; Maria Chatzou; Evan W Floden; Pablo Prieto Barja; Emilio Palumbo; Cedric Notredame
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  BIDS apps: Improving ease of use, accessibility, and reproducibility of neuroimaging data analysis methods.

Authors:  Krzysztof J Gorgolewski; Fidel Alfaro-Almagro; Tibor Auer; Pierre Bellec; Mihai Capotă; M Mallar Chakravarty; Nathan W Churchill; Alexander Li Cohen; R Cameron Craddock; Gabriel A Devenyi; Anders Eklund; Oscar Esteban; Guillaume Flandin; Satrajit S Ghosh; J Swaroop Guntupalli; Mark Jenkinson; Anisha Keshavan; Gregory Kiar; Franziskus Liem; Pradeep Reddy Raamana; David Raffelt; Christopher J Steele; Pierre-Olivier Quirion; Robert E Smith; Stephen C Strother; Gaël Varoquaux; Yida Wang; Tal Yarkoni; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Building Containerized Workflows Using the BioDepot-Workflow-Builder.

Authors:  Ling-Hong Hung; Jiaming Hu; Trevor Meiss; Alyssa Ingersoll; Wes Lloyd; Daniel Kristiyanto; Yuguang Xiong; Eric Sobie; Ka Yee Yeung
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 10.304

4.  The Scientific Filesystem.

Authors:  Vanessa Sochat
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 6.524

5.  Using bio.tools to generate and annotate workbench tool descriptions.

Authors:  Kenzo-Hugo Hillion; Ivan Kuzmin; Anton Khodak; Eric Rasche; Michael Crusoe; Hedi Peterson; Jon Ison; Hervé Ménager
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-11-30

6.  An architecture for genomics analysis in a clinical setting using Galaxy and Docker.

Authors:  W Digan; H Countouris; M Barritault; D Baudoin; P Laurent-Puig; H Blons; A Burgun; B Rance
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.524

7.  GUIdock-VNC: using a graphical desktop sharing system to provide a browser-based interface for containerized software.

Authors:  Varun Mittal; Ling-Hong Hung; Jayant Keswani; Daniel Kristiyanto; Sung Bong Lee; Ka Yee Yeung
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 6.524

8.  GUIdock: Using Docker Containers with a Common Graphics User Interface to Address the Reproducibility of Research.

Authors:  Ling-Hong Hung; Daniel Kristiyanto; Sung Bong Lee; Ka Yee Yeung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Use of application containers and workflows for genomic data analysis.

Authors:  Wade L Schulz; Thomas J S Durant; Alexa J Siddon; Richard Torres
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2016-12-30

10.  Bio-Docklets: virtualization containers for single-step execution of NGS pipelines.

Authors:  Baekdoo Kim; Thahmina Ali; Carlos Lijeron; Enis Afgan; Konstantinos Krampis
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.524

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.