Literature DB >> 26912982

Heterogeneous Marrow Uptake on FDG PET/CT is not Always a Sign of Lymphomatous Involvement.

Arun Kumar Reddy Gorla1, Bhagwant Rai Mittal1, Anish Bhattacharya1, Pankaj Malhotra2, Subhash Varma2.   

Abstract

Heterogeneous patchy marrow uptake on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in a histologically proven case of lymphoma is usually considered a virtually pathognomonic sign of lymphomatous involvement. Here, we present a young male patient of T-cell-rich non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), an uncommon morphologic variant of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), who had undergone three sequential PET/CT scans at our department during the course of his therapy. These images depict the need for careful direct comparison of the current study with the previous PET/CT studies to avoid erroneous interpretation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluorodeoxyglucose; T-cell-rich non-Hodgkin lymphoma; bone marrow; positron emission tomography/computed tomography

Year:  2016        PMID: 26912982      PMCID: PMC4729018          DOI: 10.4103/1450-1147.167596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Nucl Med        ISSN: 1450-1147


Introduction

Marrow involvement in lymphoma is conventionally assessed by bone marrow biopsy. In the recent past, FDG PET/CT evolved in to a complementary tool in the assessment of marrow infiltration.[1] Several different patterns have been described with the highest specificity ascribed to heterogenous patchy marrow uptake. However, we here describe a case depicting potential erroneous interpreta-tion of post chemotherapy FDG PET/CT studies presenting with this pattern.

Case Report

A 17-year-old male patient presented with bilateral neck swelling (Lt > Rt) with a progressive increase in the size over a duration of 4 months. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the swelling revealed lymphomatous involvement and a diagnosis of T-cell-rich diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was established after lymph nodal biopsy. The patient underwent a baseline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for initial staging, which showed widespread disease involvement of the lymph nodes [the largest measuring 2.7 × 0.4 cm in the right hilar region; maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) value 15.6] both above and below the diaphragm [Figure 1a], with splenic and marrow involvement (SUVmax value 12.5). Fused PET/CT [Figure 1b] and PET alone [Figure 1c] sagittal midline sections show heterogeneous marrow involvement of the sternum, multiple vertebrae, and the pubis. Subsequently, the patient received four cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP) regimen. The interim PET [Figure 1d–f] showed significant resolution in the abnormal fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake noted in the initial scan. Note can be made of two foci of patchy uptake (SUVmax value 4.0) in the abdominal region localizing to the lumbar vertebrae (arrows in Figure 1d–f). Few faint FDG avid nodes (retroperitoneal, with the largest measuring ~ 1.1 × 1.0 cm) were also noted and the scan was interpreted as minimal metabolically active residual disease with possibly persistent marrow disease. The patient then underwent another two cycles of R-CHOP regimen and was then referred for assessment at the end of the therapy [Figure 1g–i]. It showed no significant change in tracer distribution except for the persistent heterogeneous FDG uptake (SUVmax value 3.8) in the vertebrae. The bone marrow biopsy from the involved vertebra was negative for any lymphomatous infiltration, suggesting that persistent heterogeneous FDG avidity in the bone marrow after chemotherapy may not always signify pathological involvement.
Figure 1

PET/CT maximum intensity projection images for initial staging showing widespread disease involvement of lymph nodes both above and below the diaphragm (a) with splenic and marrow involvement. Fused PET/CT (b), and PET alone (c) sagittal midline sections show heterogeneous marrow involvement of the sternum, multiple vertebrae, and the pubis. The interim PET (d-f) showed significant resolution in the abnormal FDG uptake noted in the initial scan, with two foci of patchy uptake in the abdominal region localizing to lumbar vertebrae (arrows in d-f). End of therapy PET/CT (g-i) shows no significant change in tracer distribution except for the persistent heterogeneous FDG uptake (SUVmax value 3.8) in vertebrae

PET/CT maximum intensity projection images for initial staging showing widespread disease involvement of lymph nodes both above and below the diaphragm (a) with splenic and marrow involvement. Fused PET/CT (b), and PET alone (c) sagittal midline sections show heterogeneous marrow involvement of the sternum, multiple vertebrae, and the pubis. The interim PET (d-f) showed significant resolution in the abnormal FDG uptake noted in the initial scan, with two foci of patchy uptake in the abdominal region localizing to lumbar vertebrae (arrows in d-f). End of therapy PET/CT (g-i) shows no significant change in tracer distribution except for the persistent heterogeneous FDG uptake (SUVmax value 3.8) in vertebrae

Discussion

Heterogeneous patchy marrow uptake on FDG PET in a histologically proven case of lymphoma is usually considered a virtually pathognomonic sign of lymphomatous involvement.[123] In view of heterogeneous involvement and the disease being an uncommon variant (T-cell rich), FDG avidity in multiple vertebrae was interpreted equivocal for marrow involvement and a marrow biopsy was advised. However, bone marrow biopsy showed normal pattern of cell distribution with no lymphomatous infiltration. In this case, a careful review of the entire PET/CT study showed an interesting finding. The initial staging PET can be noted to show intense FDG uptake in multiple dorsolumbar vertebrae with relative sparing of the L2 and L4 vertebrae (arrows in Figure 1b and c). It can be observed that the repeatedly noted persistent FDG avidity is actually localizing to the L2 and L4 vertebrae (which were spared of disease involvement in the initial staging scan). This suggests that the heterogeneous uptake is, in fact, due to physiological FDG uptake in the L2 and L4 vertebrae. This flip-flop pattern of uptake with absent uptake in the pathologically involved vertebrae was likely due to chemotherapy-induced ablation of the entire marrow in those vertebrae, as also described by Lin et al.[4] A similar pattern of findings can also be noted in the rest of the visualized vertebrae and sternum (arrow heads in Figures 1b and c, e and f, h and i). Thus, we conclude that during chemotherapy, heterogeneous marrow uptake may not always signify pathological involvement and a careful direct comparison with the previous PET studies is strongly advised. T-cell-rich non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is an uncommon morphologic variant of DLBCL and is pathologically characterized by <10% malignant B cells amid a majority population of reactive T lymphocytes and histiocytes.[5678] Clinically, it occurs in younger patients, predominantly affects men, and involves the liver, spleen, and bone marrow with a greater frequency than traditional DLBCL (as also noted in the current case). Although an uncommon variant, T-cell-rich DLBCL is reported to have a natural history similar to that of other DLBCLs and respond similarly to therapy.[9]
  9 in total

1.  FDG PET/CT flip flop phenomenon in treated lymphoma of bone.

Authors:  Eugene C Lin
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.794

2.  Prognostic implications of imaging-based bone marrow assessment in lymphoma: 18F-FDG PET, MR imaging, or 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging?

Authors:  Hugo J A Adams; Thomas C Kwee; Rutger A J Nievelstein
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  FDG PET/CT for the detection of bone marrow involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hugo J A Adams; Thomas C Kwee; Bart de Keizer; Rob Fijnheer; John M H de Klerk; Rutger A J Nievelstein
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  T-cell rich B-cell lymphoma: clinical distinctiveness and response to treatment in 45 patients.

Authors:  Jonathan A Ripp; Diane C Loiue; Wendy Chan; Haq Nawaz; Carol S Portlock
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2002-08

Review 5.  18F-FDG-PET/CT in lymphoma: two decades of experience.

Authors:  A M Alvarez Páez; J M Nogueiras Alonso; A Serena Puig
Journal:  Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 1.359

6.  Among diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, T-cell-rich/histiocyte-rich BCL and CD30+ anaplastic B-cell subtypes exhibit distinct clinical features.

Authors:  B Maes; A Anastasopoulou; J C Kluin-Nelemans; I Teodorovic; R Achten; A Carbone; C De Wolf-Peeters
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Proliferation rate and outcome in children with T-cell rich B-cell lymphoma: a clinicopathologic study from the NHL-BFM-study group.

Authors:  Markus Tiemann; Marc-Oliver Riener; Alexander Claviez; Ulrike Meyer; Wolfgang Dörffel; Alfred Reiter; Reza Parwaresch
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2005-09

8.  T-cell-rich B-cell lymphoma - diagnostic and therapeutic aspects.

Authors:  Ulla Axdorph; Anna Porwit-Macdonald; Jan Sjøberg; Gunnar Grimfors; Magnus Bjørkholm
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.205

9.  Nodular lymphocyte predominant hodgkin lymphoma and T cell/histiocyte rich large B cell lymphoma--endpoints of a spectrum of one disease?

Authors:  Sylvia Hartmann; Claudia Döring; Christina Jakobus; Benjamin Rengstl; Sebastian Newrzela; Thomas Tousseyn; Xavier Sagaert; Maurilio Ponzoni; Fabio Facchetti; Chris de Wolf-Peeters; Christian Steidl; Randy Gascoyne; Ralf Küppers; Martin-Leo Hansmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of non-osseous spinal metastatic disease: the role of PET/CT and PET/MRI.

Authors:  Ali Batouli; John Braun; Kamal Singh; Ali Gholamrezanezhad; Bethany U Casagranda; Abass Alavi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 4.130

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.