BACKGROUND: Periodic drug shortages have become a reality in clinical practice. In 2010, in the context of a nationwide drug shortage, our hospital experienced an abrupt 3-month shortage of the surgical anesthetic propofol. The purpose of this retrospective study was to survey the clinical impact of the abrupt propofol shortage at our hospital and to survey for any change in perioperative mortality. METHODS: A retrospective before-and-after analysis, comparing May through July 2010 (group A, prior to the propofol shortage) to August through October 2010 (group B, during the propofol shortage). RESULTS: In May through July 2010, before the propofol shortage, a majority of patients (80%) received propofol (group A, n = 2,830). In August through October 2010, during the propofol shortage, a majority of patients (81%) received etomidate (group B, n = 3,066). We observed that net usage of etomidate increased by more than 600% in our hospital. Baseline health characteristics and type of surgery were similar between groups A and B. Thirty-day and 2-year mortality were similar between groups A and B. The reported causes and frequency of mortality in groups A and B were also similar. CONCLUSION: The propofol shortage led to an increased usage of etomidate by more than 600%. In spite of that, we did not detect an increase in mortality associated with the increased use of etomidate during a 3-month propofol shortage.
BACKGROUND: Periodic drug shortages have become a reality in clinical practice. In 2010, in the context of a nationwide drug shortage, our hospital experienced an abrupt 3-month shortage of the surgical anesthetic propofol. The purpose of this retrospective study was to survey the clinical impact of the abrupt propofol shortage at our hospital and to survey for any change in perioperative mortality. METHODS: A retrospective before-and-after analysis, comparing May through July 2010 (group A, prior to the propofol shortage) to August through October 2010 (group B, during the propofol shortage). RESULTS: In May through July 2010, before the propofol shortage, a majority of patients (80%) received propofol (group A, n = 2,830). In August through October 2010, during the propofol shortage, a majority of patients (81%) received etomidate (group B, n = 3,066). We observed that net usage of etomidate increased by more than 600% in our hospital. Baseline health characteristics and type of surgery were similar between groups A and B. Thirty-day and 2-year mortality were similar between groups A and B. The reported causes and frequency of mortality in groups A and B were also similar. CONCLUSION: The propofol shortage led to an increased usage of etomidate by more than 600%. In spite of that, we did not detect an increase in mortality associated with the increased use of etomidate during a 3-month propofol shortage.
Entities:
Keywords:
drug shortage; etomidate; induction of anesthesia; intravenous anesthetics, propofol
Authors: Karis L Tekwani; Hannah F Watts; Rolla T Sweis; Kathleen H Rzechula; Erik B Kulstad Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Chad E Wagner; Julian S Bick; Daniel Johnson; Rashid Ahmad; Xue Han; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Mias Pretorius Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Laura C McPhee; Omar Badawi; Gilles L Fraser; Patricia A Lerwick; Richard R Riker; Ilene H Zuckerman; Christine Franey; David B Seder Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Brian H Cuthbertson; Charles L Sprung; Djillali Annane; Sylvie Chevret; Mark Garfield; Serge Goodman; Pierre-Francois Laterre; Jean Louis Vincent; Klaus Freivogel; Konrad Reinhart; Mervyn Singer; Didier Payen; Yoram G Weiss Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-08-04 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Rosa Rodriguez-Monguio; Zhixin Lun; Tasce Bongiovanni; Catherine L Chen; Enrique Seoane-Vazquez Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2022-03-17 Impact factor: 5.228