Literature DB >> 26912719

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Considerations for the Use of Wildlife in Research and Education.

Robert S Sikes1, John A Bryan1.   

Abstract

Ethical and effective oversight of the use of wildlife species in research and education requires consideration of issues and methods not relevant to work with traditional laboratory or domesticated animals, just as the effective oversight of biomedical research requires consideration of issues and methods not germane to wildlife research. Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees or other institutional review committees can meet their responsibilities in these disparate types of animal activities only by using resources tailored to the animals and situations encountered. Here we review the issues and the resources that facilitate effective oversight of such activities in the wildlife research arena available to researchers, institutional review committees, regulatory bodies, and accrediting bodies. Issues covered include an understanding of the fundamental differences between wildlife research and biomedical research; the profound differences between wildlife species and traditional laboratory subjects, most of which are domesticated animals; and the unique issues presented when the research subjects are members of wild populations and communities. We review the resources available for effective oversight of wildlife projects and emphasize that competent oversight of wildlife research demands the use of appropriate resources. These resources include guidelines designed for the use of wild species (taxon-specific guidelines) and protocol forms tailored for the species and situations encountered.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC); One Health; animal care committee; animal experimentation; animal welfare; ecology; wild animals; wildlife

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26912719     DOI: 10.1093/ilar/ilv071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ILAR J        ISSN: 1084-2020


  5 in total

1.  2016 Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education.

Authors:  Robert S Sikes
Journal:  J Mammal       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 2.416

Review 2.  Review of Rodent Euthanasia Methods.

Authors:  Nirah H Shomer; Krystal H Allen-Worthington; Debra L Hickman; Mahesh Jonnalagadda; Joseph T Newsome; Andrea R Slate; Helen Valentine; Angelina M Williams; Michele Wilkinson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Ecological study of cave nectar bats reveals low risk of direct transmission of bat viruses to humans.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Wei Zhang; Bei Li; Shi-Zhe Xie; Fan Yi; Ren-Di Jiang; Yun Luo; Xiang-Yang He; Yun-Zhi Zhang; Zheng-Li Shi; Li-Biao Zhang; Xing-Lou Yang
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2022-07-18

4.  Toward an Ecological Framework for Assessing Reservoirs of Vector-Borne Pathogens: Wildlife Reservoirs of Trypanosoma cruzi across the Southern United States.

Authors:  Carolyn L Hodo; Sarah A Hamer
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2017-12-15

5.  Describing vegetation characteristics used by two rare forest-dwelling species: Will established reserves provide for coastal marten in Oregon?

Authors:  Katie M Moriarty; Jake Verschuyl; Andrew J Kroll; Raymond Davis; Joshua Chapman; Bruce Hollen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.