Joohee Lee1, Miles M Sato2, Marc N Coel3, Kyung-Han Lee4, Sandi A Kwee5. 1. Oncology Research Program, Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Oncology Research Program, Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii. 3. Hamamatsu/Queen's PET Imaging Center, Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii; and. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 5. Hamamatsu/Queen's PET Imaging Center, Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii; and Department of Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii kwee@hawaii.edu.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Measurements of metabolically active tumor volume (MATV) can be applied to (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT to quantify whole-body tumor burden. This study evaluated the serial application of these measurements as systemic treatment response markers and predictors of disease progression in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). METHODS: Forty-two patients completed sequential (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT scans before and 1-3 mo after starting treatment for CRPC. Whole-body tumor segmentation was applied to determine net MATV from each scan. Changes in net MATV were evaluated as predictors of time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression by Kaplan-Meier and proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS: Treatments consisted of chemotherapy in 16 patients, antiandrogens in 19 patients, (223)Ra-dichloride in 5 patients, and sipuleucel-T in 2 patients. A significant MATV response (defined as a ≥30% decrease in net MATV) was observed in 20 patients on the basis of in-treatment PET/CT performed an average of 51 d (median, 49 d) into treatment. Significantly longer times to PSA progression were observed in patients who exhibited an MATV response (418 d vs. 116 d, P = 0.0067). MATV response was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.246 (P = 0.0113) for PSA progression, which remained significant when adjusted for treatment type. CONCLUSION: Significant changes in whole-body tumor burden can be measured on (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT over the course of contemporary treatments for CRPC. In this study, these changes were found to be predictive of PSA progression as a potential surrogate marker of treatment outcome. Because (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT can also be used for localizing resistant tumors, this modality can potentially complement other measures of response in the precision management of advanced prostate cancer.
UNLABELLED: Measurements of metabolically active tumor volume (MATV) can be applied to (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT to quantify whole-body tumor burden. This study evaluated the serial application of these measurements as systemic treatment response markers and predictors of disease progression in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). METHODS: Forty-two patients completed sequential (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT scans before and 1-3 mo after starting treatment for CRPC. Whole-body tumor segmentation was applied to determine net MATV from each scan. Changes in net MATV were evaluated as predictors of time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression by Kaplan-Meier and proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS: Treatments consisted of chemotherapy in 16 patients, antiandrogens in 19 patients, (223)Ra-dichloride in 5 patients, and sipuleucel-T in 2 patients. A significant MATV response (defined as a ≥30% decrease in net MATV) was observed in 20 patients on the basis of in-treatment PET/CT performed an average of 51 d (median, 49 d) into treatment. Significantly longer times to PSA progression were observed in patients who exhibited an MATV response (418 d vs. 116 d, P = 0.0067). MATV response was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.246 (P = 0.0113) for PSA progression, which remained significant when adjusted for treatment type. CONCLUSION: Significant changes in whole-body tumor burden can be measured on (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT over the course of contemporary treatments for CRPC. In this study, these changes were found to be predictive of PSA progression as a potential surrogate marker of treatment outcome. Because (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT can also be used for localizing resistant tumors, this modality can potentially complement other measures of response in the precision management of advanced prostate cancer.
Authors: Evan Y Yu; Fenghai Duan; Mark Muzi; Xuan Deng; Bennett B Chin; Joshi J Alumkal; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Jina M Taub; Ben Herman; Celestia S Higano; Robert K Doot; Donna Hartfeil; Philip G Febbo; David A Mankoff Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Zsolt Szabo; Esther Mena; Steven P Rowe; Donika Plyku; Rosa Nidal; Mario A Eisenberger; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Hong Fan; Robert F Dannals; Ying Chen; Ronnie C Mease; Melin Vranesic; Akrita Bhatnagar; George Sgouros; Steve Y Cho; Martin G Pomper Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: M Colombié; L Campion; C Bailly; D Rusu; T Rousseau; C Mathieu; L Ferrer; N Rousseau; F Kraeber-Bodéré; C Rousseau Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-07-21 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: James L Mohler; Philip W Kantoff; Andrew J Armstrong; Robert R Bahnson; Michael Cohen; Anthony Victor D'Amico; James A Eastham; Charles A Enke; Thomas A Farrington; Celestia S Higano; Eric Mark Horwitz; Christopher J Kane; Mark H Kawachi; Michael Kuettel; Timothy M Kuzel; Richard J Lee; Arnold W Malcolm; David Miller; Elizabeth R Plimack; Julio M Pow-Sang; David Raben; Sylvia Richey; Mack Roach; Eric Rohren; Stan Rosenfeld; Edward Schaeffer; Eric J Small; Guru Sonpavde; Sandy Srinivas; Cy Stein; Seth A Strope; Jonathan Tward; Dorothy A Shead; Maria Ho Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Howard I Scher; Susan Halabi; Ian Tannock; Michael Morris; Cora N Sternberg; Michael A Carducci; Mario A Eisenberger; Celestia Higano; Glenn J Bubley; Robert Dreicer; Daniel Petrylak; Philip Kantoff; Ethan Basch; William Kevin Kelly; William D Figg; Eric J Small; Tomasz M Beer; George Wilding; Alison Martin; Maha Hussain Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Peijin Han; Aurelian Bidulescu; John R Barber; Steven H Zeisel; Corinne E Joshu; Anna E Prizment; Mara Z Vitolins; Elizabeth A Platz Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Francesco Fiz; Helmut Dittman; Cristina Campi; Silvia Morbelli; Cecilia Marini; Massimo Brignone; Matteo Bauckneht; Roberta Piva; Anna Maria Massone; Michele Piana; Gianmario Sambuceti; Christian la Fougère Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) Date: 2018-07-28