Andor F van den Hoven1, Charlotte E N M Rosenbaum2, Sjoerd G Elias3, Hugo W A M de Jong2, Miriam Koopman4, Helena M Verkooijen2, Abass Alavi5, Maurice A A J van den Bosch2, Marnix G E H Lam2. 1. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands a.f.vandenhoven@umcutrecht.nl. 2. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and. 5. Division of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Randomized controlled trials are investigating the benefit of hepatic radioembolization added to systemic therapy in the first- and second-line treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Remarkably, administered activity may still be suboptimal, because a dose-response relationship has not been defined. The purpose of this study was to characterize the relationship between tumor-absorbed dose and response after (90)Y radioembolization treatment for CRLM. METHODS: Thirty patients with unresectable chemorefractory CRLM were treated with resin (90)Y-microspheres in a prospective phase II clinical trial. Tumor-absorbed dose was quantified on (90)Y PET. Metabolic tumor activity, defined as tumor lesion glycolysis (TLG*) on (18)F-FDG PET, was measured at baseline and 1 mo after treatment. The relationship between tumor-absorbed dose and posttreatment metabolic activity was assessed per metastasis with a linear mixed-effects regression model. RESULTS: Treated metastases (n = 133) were identified. The mean tumor-absorbed dose was 51 ± 28 Gy (range, 7-174 Gy). A 50% reduction in TLG* was achieved in 46% of metastases and in 11 of 30 (37%) patients for the sum of metastases. The latter was associated with a prolonged median overall survival (11.6 vs. 6.6 mo, P = 0.02). A strong and statistically significant dose-response relationship was found (P < 0.001). The dose effect depended on baseline TLG* (P < 0.01). The effective tumor-absorbed dose was conservatively estimated at a minimum of 40-60 Gy. CONCLUSION: A strong dose-response relationship exists for the treatment of CRLM with resin microsphere (90)Y radioembolization. Treatment efficacy is, however, still limited, because the currently used pretreatment activity calculation methods curb potentially achievable tumor-absorbed dose values. A more personalized approach to radioembolization is required before concluding on its clinical potential.
UNLABELLED: Randomized controlled trials are investigating the benefit of hepatic radioembolization added to systemic therapy in the first- and second-line treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Remarkably, administered activity may still be suboptimal, because a dose-response relationship has not been defined. The purpose of this study was to characterize the relationship between tumor-absorbed dose and response after (90)Y radioembolization treatment for CRLM. METHODS: Thirty patients with unresectable chemorefractory CRLM were treated with resin (90)Y-microspheres in a prospective phase II clinical trial. Tumor-absorbed dose was quantified on (90)Y PET. Metabolic tumor activity, defined as tumor lesion glycolysis (TLG*) on (18)F-FDG PET, was measured at baseline and 1 mo after treatment. The relationship between tumor-absorbed dose and posttreatment metabolic activity was assessed per metastasis with a linear mixed-effects regression model. RESULTS: Treated metastases (n = 133) were identified. The mean tumor-absorbed dose was 51 ± 28 Gy (range, 7-174 Gy). A 50% reduction in TLG* was achieved in 46% of metastases and in 11 of 30 (37%) patients for the sum of metastases. The latter was associated with a prolonged median overall survival (11.6 vs. 6.6 mo, P = 0.02). A strong and statistically significant dose-response relationship was found (P < 0.001). The dose effect depended on baseline TLG* (P < 0.01). The effective tumor-absorbed dose was conservatively estimated at a minimum of 40-60 Gy. CONCLUSION: A strong dose-response relationship exists for the treatment of CRLM with resin microsphere (90)Y radioembolization. Treatment efficacy is, however, still limited, because the currently used pretreatment activity calculation methods curb potentially achievable tumor-absorbed dose values. A more personalized approach to radioembolization is required before concluding on its clinical potential.
Authors: R Vera; E González-Flores; C Rubio; J Urbano; M Valero Camps; J J Ciampi-Dopazo; J Orcajo Rincón; V Morillo Macías; M A Gomez Braco; G Suarez-Artacho Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Ahmed A Alsultan; Caren van Roekel; Maarten W Barentsz; Maarten L J Smits; Britt Kunnen; Miriam Koopman; Arthur J A T Braat; Rutger C G Bruijnen; Bart de Keizer; Marnix G E H Lam Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Hugo Levillain; Oreste Bagni; Christophe M Deroose; Arnaud Dieudonné; Silvano Gnesin; Oliver S Grosser; S Cheenu Kappadath; Andrew Kennedy; Nima Kokabi; David M Liu; David C Madoff; Armeen Mahvash; Antonio Martinez de la Cuesta; David C E Ng; Philipp M Paprottka; Cinzia Pettinato; Macarena Rodríguez-Fraile; Riad Salem; Bruno Sangro; Lidia Strigari; Daniel Y Sze; Berlinda J de Wit van der Veen; Patrick Flamen Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Sander C Ebbers; Caren van Roekel; Manon N G J A Braat; Maarten W Barentsz; Marnix G E H Lam; Arthur J A T Braat Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-12-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Fourat Ridouani; Mohamed M Soliman; Ryan W England; Meier Hsu; Chaya S Moskowitz; Raphael Doustaly; Constantinos T Sofocleous; F Edward Boas; Hooman Yarmohammadi; Amy R Deipolyi Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 3.528