| Literature DB >> 26911917 |
Deborah Sumari1,2, Brian T Grimberg3, D'Arbra Blankenship4, Joseph Mugasa5, Kefas Mugittu6, Lee Moore7, Paul Gwakisa8,9, Maciej Zborowski10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Conventional malaria parasite detection methods, such as rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) and light microscopy (LM), are not sensitive enough to detect low level parasites and identification of gametocytes in the peripheral blood. A modified and sensitive laboratory prototype, Magnetic Deposition Microscopy (MDM) was developed to increase the detection of sub-microscopic parasitaemia and estimation of gametocytes density in asymptomatic school children.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26911917 PMCID: PMC4765204 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-016-1170-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Principle of Magnetic Deposition Microscopy (MDM). The cell suspension (a) is pumped through a channel comprising manifold platen with inlet and outlet ports (b), channel cut-out spacer (c) and a transparent deposition slide (d), as indicated by curved arrows. The flow channel assembly (b–d) is pressed against the interpolar gap of a permanent magnet (e) generating magnetic force on the magnetically susceptible cells due to a highly non-uniform fringing field, as indicated by the magnetic energy density map (where H is the magnetic field strength in amperes per m, A/m, and B is the magnetic flux density, in tesla, T). The captured cells form a deposit (f) amenable to staining and microscopic analysis. The MDM cell deposit (g) shows enrichment in the magnetically susceptible cells compared to the original sample (h)—here the malaria parasite-infected erythrocyte culture (NF54 strain, 40× oil magnification). G gametocyte, MG male gametocyte, T trophozoite
Fig. 2MDM apparatus used in the field study. a Note five-channel sample flow arrangement operated by a syringe pump and a programmable controller. The flow channel assembly is pressed against the permanent magnet (painted blue) using four wing nuts. b Five blood samples visible inside 1 mL syringes prior to being pumped back into to the collection tubes (bottom) through the flow channel pressed against the magnet. The weight of the system is estimated at less than 3 kg
Fig. 3MDM counts increase sensitivity to late stage parasite forms and gametocytes (NF54 strain). a Radar log-plot of Thin Smear (TS) and MDM mean counts from five independent experiments showing increase in the late stage and gametocyte content on the MDM slides relative to TS slides. b Fold enrichment of infected RBCs (iRBCs) counts on the MDM slides relative to TS slides showing individual mean counts (circles) and quartile boxes (unity line indicates no-enrichment limit). The increase in fold enrichment with the parasite stage is consistent with the increase in intraerythrocytic haemozoin concentration [7]
Fig. 4As in Fig. 3, MDM counts increase sensitivity to late stage parasite forms and gametocytes for 3D7 strain. Note: the same trend as in previous Figure. The arrow indicates null counts on MDM slide for that particular experiment
Prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum all stages as determined by three diagnostic tests (LM, RDT and MDM) and gametocytes prevalence determined by LM and MDM only, in both cases n = 303
| LM (%) | 95 % CI | RDT (%) | 95 % CI | MDM (%) | 95 % CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All stages | 23 (7.6) | 4.9–11.2 | 52 (17.2) | 13.1–21.9 | 59 (19.5) | 15.2–24.4 |
| Gametocytes | 4 (1.3) | 0.4–3.3 | – | – | 12 (4) | 2.1–6.8 |
Comparison of sensitivity and specificity for the parasite detection between MDM, LM (part A1) and RDT (part A2) and comparison of sensitivity and specificity of gametocytes detection between MDM and LM (part B)
| A1 | MDM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LM | Positive | Negative | Total | (%) | |
| Positive | 19 | 4 | 23 | Sensitivity | 36.5 |
| Negative | 40 | 240 | 280 | Specificity | 87.5 |
| Total | 59 | 244 | 303 | ||