Elizabeth L Murnane1, Dan Cosley2, Pamara Chang3, Shion Guha2, Ellen Frank4, Geri Gay5, Mark Matthews2. 1. Information Science Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA elm236@cornell.edu. 2. Information Science Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. 3. Department of Communication, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. 4. School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 5. Information Science Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA Department of Communication, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To understand self-monitoring strategies used independently of clinical treatment by individuals with bipolar disorder (BD), in order to recommend technology design principles to support mental health management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants with BD (N = 552) were recruited through the Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance, the International Bipolar Foundation, and WeSearchTogether.org to complete a survey of closed- and open-ended questions. In this study, we focus on descriptive results and qualitative analyses. RESULTS: Individuals reported primarily self-monitoring items related to their bipolar disorder (mood, sleep, finances, exercise, and social interactions), with an increasing trend towards the use of digital tracking methods observed. Most participants reported having positive experiences with technology-based tracking because it enables self-reflection and agency regarding health management and also enhances lines of communication with treatment teams. Reported challenges stem from poor usability or difficulty interpreting self-tracked data. DISCUSSION: Two major implications for technology-based self-monitoring emerged from our results. First, technologies can be designed to be more condition-oriented, intuitive, and proactive. Second, more automated forms of digital symptom tracking and intervention are desired, and our results suggest the feasibility of detecting and predicting emotional states from patterns of technology usage. However, we also uncovered tension points, namely that technology designed to support mental health can also be a disruptor. CONCLUSION: This study provides increased understanding of self-monitoring practices, attitudes, and needs of individuals with bipolar disorder. This knowledge bears implications for clinical researchers and practitioners seeking insight into how individuals independently self-manage their condition as well as for researchers designing monitoring technologies to support mental health management.
OBJECTIVE: To understand self-monitoring strategies used independently of clinical treatment by individuals with bipolar disorder (BD), in order to recommend technology design principles to support mental health management. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Participants with BD (N = 552) were recruited through the Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance, the International Bipolar Foundation, and WeSearchTogether.org to complete a survey of closed- and open-ended questions. In this study, we focus on descriptive results and qualitative analyses. RESULTS: Individuals reported primarily self-monitoring items related to their bipolar disorder (mood, sleep, finances, exercise, and social interactions), with an increasing trend towards the use of digital tracking methods observed. Most participants reported having positive experiences with technology-based tracking because it enables self-reflection and agency regarding health management and also enhances lines of communication with treatment teams. Reported challenges stem from poor usability or difficulty interpreting self-tracked data. DISCUSSION: Two major implications for technology-based self-monitoring emerged from our results. First, technologies can be designed to be more condition-oriented, intuitive, and proactive. Second, more automated forms of digital symptom tracking and intervention are desired, and our results suggest the feasibility of detecting and predicting emotional states from patterns of technology usage. However, we also uncovered tension points, namely that technology designed to support mental health can also be a disruptor. CONCLUSION: This study provides increased understanding of self-monitoring practices, attitudes, and needs of individuals with bipolar disorder. This knowledge bears implications for clinical researchers and practitioners seeking insight into how individuals independently self-manage their condition as well as for researchers designing monitoring technologies to support mental health management.
Authors: Sindhu Kiranmai Ernala; Kathan H Kashiparekh; Amir Bolous; Asra Ali; Michael L Birnbaum; Munmun DE Choudhury Journal: Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact Date: 2021-04-22
Authors: Peter W Tuerk; Cindy M Schaeffer; Joseph F McGuire; Margo Adams Larsen; Nicole Capobianco; John Piacentini Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Pallavi Ranade-Kharkar; Charlene Weir; Chuck Norlin; Sarah A Collins; Lou Ann Scarton; Gina B Baker; Damian Borbolla; Vanina Taliercio; Guilherme Del Fiol Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 4.497