Literature DB >> 26911481

Propensity to metal accumulation and oxidative stress responses of two benthic species (Cerastoderma edule and Nephtys hombergii): are tolerance processes limiting their responsiveness?

Ana Marques1, David Piló2,3, Olinda Araújo4, Fábio Pereira2, Sofia Guilherme5, Susana Carvalho2,6, Maria Ana Santos5, Mário Pacheco5, Patrícia Pereira5.   

Abstract

The chronic exposure of benthic organisms to metals in sediments can lead to the development of tolerance mechanisms, thus diminishing their responsiveness. This study aims to evaluate the accumulation profiles of V, Cr, Co, Ni, As, Cd, Pb and Hg and antioxidant system responses of two benthic organisms (Cerastoderma edule, Bivalvia; Nephtys hombergii, Polychaeta). This approach will provide clarifications about the ability of each species to signalise metal contamination. Organisms of both species were collected at the Tagus estuary, in two sites with distinct contamination degrees (ALC, slightly contaminated; BAR, highly contaminated). Accordingly, C. edule accumulated higher concentrations of As, Pb and Hg at BAR compared to ALC. However, antioxidant responses of C. edule were almost unaltered at BAR and no peroxidative damage occurred, suggesting adjustment mechanisms to the presence of metals. In contrast, N. hombergii showed a minor propensity to metal accumulation, only signalising spatial differences for As and Pb and accumulating lower concentrations of metals than C. edule. The differences in metal accumulation observed between species might be due to their distinctive foraging behaviour and/or the ability of N. hombergii to minimise the metal uptake. Despite that, the accumulation of As and Pb was on the basis of the polychaete antioxidant defences inhibition at BAR, including CAT, SOD, GR and GPx. The integrated biomarker response index (IBRv2) confirmed that N. hombergii was more affected by metal exposure than C. edule. In the light of current findings, in field-based studies, the information of C. edule as a bioindicator should be complemented by that provided by another benthic species, since tolerance mechanisms to metals can hinder a correct diagnosis of sediment contamination and of the system's health. Overall, the present study contributed to improve the lack of fundamental knowledge of two widespread and common estuarine species, providing insights of the metal accumulation profiles under a scenario of chronic contamination. Finally, this work provided useful information that can be applied in the interpretation of future environmental monitoring studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antioxidant defences; Benthic organisms; Estuary contamination; Integrated biomarker response; Metal accumulation; Tolerance mechanisms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26911481     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-016-1625-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  52 in total

1.  Oxidative stress responses in two populations of Laeonereis acuta (Polychaeta, Nereididae) after acute and chronic exposure to copper.

Authors:  L A Geracitano; R Bocchetti; J M Monserrat; F Regoli; A Bianchini
Journal:  Mar Environ Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.130

Review 2.  Internal metal sequestration and its ecotoxicological relevance: a review.

Authors:  Martina G Vijver; Cornelis A M Van Gestel; Roman P Lanno; Nico M Van Straalen; Willie J G M Peijnenburg
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services.

Authors:  Boris Worm; Edward B Barbier; Nicola Beaumont; J Emmett Duffy; Carl Folke; Benjamin S Halpern; Jeremy B C Jackson; Heike K Lotze; Fiorenza Micheli; Stephen R Palumbi; Enric Sala; Kimberley A Selkoe; John J Stachowicz; Reg Watson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Oxidative stress in Perna perna and other bivalves as indicators of environmental stress in the Brazilian marine environment: antioxidants, lipid peroxidation and DNA damage.

Authors:  Eduardo Alves de Almeida; Afonso Celso Dias Bainy; Ana Paula de Melo Loureiro; Glaucia Regina Martinez; Sayuri Miyamoto; Janice Onuki; Lívea Fujita Barbosa; Camila Carrião Machado Garcia; Fernanda Manso Prado; Graziella Eliza Ronsein; Carlos Alexandre Sigolo; Cláudia Barbosa Brochini; Ana Maria Gracioso Martins; Marisa Helena Gennari de Medeiros; Paolo Di Mascio
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 2.320

5.  Comparison of metal uptake rate and absorption efficiency in marine bivalves.

Authors:  W X Wang
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 6.  Metals, toxicity and oxidative stress.

Authors:  M Valko; H Morris; M T D Cronin
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Looking for suitable biomarkers in benthic macroinvertebrates inhabiting coastal areas with low metal contamination: comparison between the bivalve Cerastoderma edule and the Polychaete Diopatra neapolitana.

Authors:  Rosa Freitas; Elisabeth Costa; Cátia Velez; José Santos; Ana Lima; Cristina Oliveira; Ana Maria Rodrigues; Victor Quintino; Etelvina Figueira
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 6.291

8.  Surface metal adsorption on zooplankton carapaces: implications for exposure and effects in consumer organisms.

Authors:  Karen A Robinson; Donald J Baird; Fred J Wrona
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 8.071

9.  Oxidative stress responses in bivalves (Scrobicularia plana, Cerastoderma edule) from the Oued Souss estuary (Morocco).

Authors:  H Bergayou; C Mouneyrac; J Pellerin; A Moukrim
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 6.291

10.  Biomarkers of oxidative stress and DNA damage in agricultural workers: a pilot study.

Authors:  Juan F Muniz; Linda McCauley; J Scherer; M Lasarev; M Koshy; Y W Kow; Valle Nazar-Stewart; G E Kisby
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 4.219

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.