Johanna C Bendell1, Ahmed Zakari2, James D Peyton3, Ralph Boccia4, Mark Moskowitz5, Victor Gian3, Andrew Lipman5, David Waterhouse6, Richard LoCicero7, Chris Earwood8, Cassie M Lane8, Anthony Meluch3. 1. Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee, USA Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, Tennessee, USA jbendell@tnonc.com. 2. Florida Hospital Cancer Institute, Orlando, Florida, USA. 3. Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. 4. Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 5. Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee, USA Florida Cancer Specialists, Ft. Myers, Florida, USA. 6. Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee, USA Oncology Hematology Care (OHC), Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. 7. Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville, Georgia, USA. 8. Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
It was estimated that in 2015 there would be approximately 132,700 new cases of colorectal cancer and 49,700 deaths due to this disease [1]. While surgical resection of metastases is sometimes curative, most patients with liver metastases are not considered resectable because of the number or location of the metastases. Advances in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), with increased response rates, can convert some patients with initially unresectable liver metastases to resectable, allowing for potentially curative treatment.In the phase II OLIVIA trial, patients with liver metastases from mCRC were randomized to bevacizumab plus modified folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or FOLFOXIRI [2]. Bevacizumab/FOLFOXIRI was associated with higher rates of response (81% vs. 62%) and resection (61% vs. 49%), and prolonged median progression-free survival (mPFS) (18.6 months vs. 11.5 months), compared with bevacizumab/mFOLFOX6. In the phase III TRIBE trial, first-line therapy with FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab was associated with improved mPFS (12.1 months vs. 9.7 months) and response rate (65% vs. 53%) compared with FOLFIRI/bevacizumab; however, there was no difference in R0 resection rate between treatments (15% vs. 12%) [3]. A subsequent analysis showed significant improvement in median overall survival (OS) with FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab treatment (29.8 months vs. 25.8 months) [4]. Another phase II study evaluated panitumumab with FOLFOXIRI as first-line treatment with wild-type KRAS, HRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mCRC [5]. Thirty-three patients (89%) achieved objective response. Sixteen patients (43%) underwent resection of metastatic sites, with R0 resection performed in 13 patients (35%).Based on the potential for improved response rates, we conducted a phase II study of panitumumab plus FOLFOXIRI as first-line treatment for patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC with liver-only metastases. Patients were eligible regardless of whether they were considered surgical candidates at baseline. After the protocol was initiated, new findings were published indicating that RAS mutations outside of KRAS exon 2 are also associated with inferior survival with combination panitumumab and oxaliplatin-based therapy [6]. Enrollment was halted while patients in the study underwent expanded KRAS/NRAS analysis. Eight of the 15 patients consented to expanded analysis, with no additional mutations identified. Of the 12 patients evaluable for efficacy, 75% achieved a partial response (PR) (Table 1). Ten patients underwent surgery; all had complete resections that showed pathologic PR. No significant safety signals were seen; the most common treatment-related adverse events (all grades) were rash (80%), diarrhea (60%), fatigue (53%), and nausea (53%). Despite early closure of the study, this regimen is a viable option for patients with liver-only mCRC.
Table 1.
Summary of clinical activities
Trial Information
Colorectal cancerMetastatic / AdvancedNonePhase IISingle ArmOverall Response RateRate of R0 resectionProgression-Free SurvivalAcute Toxicity Produced by the RegimenPlanned enrollment was originally 49 patients.Active and should be pursued further
Drug Information
PanitumumabVectibixAmgenAntibodyEpidermal growth factor receptor6 mg/kgIVDay 1 of each 14-day cycle with FOLFOXIRI5-FU 3,200 mg/m2, 48-hour continuous IV infusionLeucovorin 200 mg/m2 IVIrinotecan 125 mg/m2Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV
Study terminated before completionNot CollectedActive and should be pursued furtherIt was estimated that in 2015 there would be approximately 132,700 new cases of colorectal cancer and 49,700 deaths due to this disease [1]. While surgical resection of metastases is sometimes curative, most patients with liver metastases are not considered resectable because of the number or location of the metastases. Advances in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), with increased response rates, can convert some patients with initially unresectable liver metastases to resectable, allowing for potentially curative treatment.In the phase II OLIVIA trial, patients with liver metastases from mCRC were randomized to bevacizumab plus modified folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or FOLFOXIRI [2]. Bevacizumab/FOLFOXIRI was associated with higher rates of response (81% vs. 62%) and resection (61% vs. 49%), and prolonged median progression-free survival (mPFS) (18.6 months vs. 11.5 months), compared with bevacizumab/mFOLFOX6. In the phase III TRIBE trial, first-line therapy with FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab was associated with improved mPFS (12.1 months vs. 9.7 months) and response rate (65% vs. 53%) compared with FOLFIRI/bevacizumab; however, there was no difference in R0 resection rate between treatments (15% vs. 12%) [3]. A subsequent analysis showed significant improvement in median overall survival (OS) with FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab treatment (29.8 months vs. 25.8 months) [4]. Another phase II study evaluated panitumumab with FOLFOXIRI as first-line treatment with wild-type KRAS, HRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mCRC [5]. Thirty-three patients (89%) achieved objective response. Sixteen patients (43%) underwent resection of metastatic sites, with R0 resection performed in 13 patients (35%).Based on the potential for improved response rates, we conducted a phase II study of panitumumab plus FOLFOXIRI as first-line treatment for patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC with liver-only metastases. Patients were eligible regardless of whether they were considered surgical candidates at baseline. After the protocol was initiated, new findings were published indicating that RAS mutations outside of KRAS exon 2 are also associated with inferior survival with combination panitumumab and oxaliplatin-based therapy [6]. Enrollment was halted while patients in the study underwent expanded KRAS/NRAS analysis. Figures 1 and 2 present PFS and OS data from our study. Eight of the 15 patients consented to expanded analysis, with no additional mutations identified. Of the 12 patients evaluable for efficacy, 75% achieved a partial response (PR) (Table 1). Ten patients underwent surgery; all had complete resections that showed pathologic PR. No significant safety signals were seen; the most common treatment-related adverse events (all grades) were rash (80%), diarrhea (60%), fatigue (53%), and nausea (53%) (Table 2). Despite early closure of the study, this regimen is a viable option for patients with liver-only mCRC.
Authors: Jean-Yves Douillard; Kelly S Oliner; Salvatore Siena; Josep Tabernero; Ronald Burkes; Mario Barugel; Yves Humblet; Gyorgy Bodoky; David Cunningham; Jacek Jassem; Fernando Rivera; Ilona Kocákova; Paul Ruff; Maria Błasińska-Morawiec; Martin Šmakal; Jean Luc Canon; Mark Rother; Richard Williams; Alan Rong; Jeffrey Wiezorek; Roger Sidhu; Scott D Patterson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-09-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: L Fornaro; S Lonardi; G Masi; F Loupakis; F Bergamo; L Salvatore; C Cremolini; M Schirripa; C Vivaldi; G Aprile; A Zaniboni; S Bracarda; G Fontanini; E Sensi; C Lupi; M Morvillo; V Zagonel; A Falcone Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2013-05-10 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: T Gruenberger; J Bridgewater; I Chau; P García Alfonso; M Rivoire; S Mudan; S Lasserre; F Hermann; D Waterkamp; R Adam Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 32.976