Literature DB >> 26911408

A Phase II Study of FOLFOXIRI Plus Panitumumab Followed by Evaluation for Resection in Patients With Metastatic KRAS Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases Only.

Johanna C Bendell1, Ahmed Zakari2, James D Peyton3, Ralph Boccia4, Mark Moskowitz5, Victor Gian3, Andrew Lipman5, David Waterhouse6, Richard LoCicero7, Chris Earwood8, Cassie M Lane8, Anthony Meluch3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are not candidates for potentially curative resection may become resectable with more aggressive chemotherapy regimens. In this nonrandomized trial, we evaluated folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) plus the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor panitumumab as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type mCRC with liver-only metastasis.
METHODS: Patients received FOLFOXIRI (5-FU, 3,200 mg/m(2), 48-hour continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion; leucovorin, 200 mg/m(2) i.v.; irinotecan, 125 mg/m(2); oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m(2) i.v.) and panitumumab (6 mg/kg i.v.) on day 1 of 14-day cycles. Patients were restaged and evaluated for surgery every four cycles. Planned enrollment was originally 49 patients. The primary endpoint was objective response rate.
RESULTS: Fifteen patients (median age: 55 years; 87% male) received a median 6 cycles of treatment (range: 1-33 cycles); 10 patients (67%) were surgical candidates at baseline. Twelve patients were evaluable for clinical response; 9 (60%) achieved partial response. Ten patients underwent surgery; all were complete resections and pathologic partial response. Treatment-related grade 3 adverse events included diarrhea (33%) and rash (20%). Enrollment was halted because of emerging data on expanded KRAS/NRAS mutations beyond the region we initially examined, and the potential for negative interaction with oxaliplatin-based therapy. Eight patients underwent expanded KRAS/NRAS analysis outside exon 2; no additional mutations were found.
CONCLUSION: KRAS/NRAS mutations outside the region tested in this study were recently shown to be associated with inferior survival on similar treatment regimens. Therefore, this trial was stopped early. This regimen remains a viable option for patients with liver-only mCRC in the KRAS/NRAS wild-type population. Enrollment criteria on future studies should include testing for the newly identified mutations. ©AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary is the property of the authors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26911408      PMCID: PMC4786359          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


Discussion

It was estimated that in 2015 there would be approximately 132,700 new cases of colorectal cancer and 49,700 deaths due to this disease [1]. While surgical resection of metastases is sometimes curative, most patients with liver metastases are not considered resectable because of the number or location of the metastases. Advances in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), with increased response rates, can convert some patients with initially unresectable liver metastases to resectable, allowing for potentially curative treatment. In the phase II OLIVIA trial, patients with liver metastases from mCRC were randomized to bevacizumab plus modified folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or FOLFOXIRI [2]. Bevacizumab/FOLFOXIRI was associated with higher rates of response (81% vs. 62%) and resection (61% vs. 49%), and prolonged median progression-free survival (mPFS) (18.6 months vs. 11.5 months), compared with bevacizumab/mFOLFOX6. In the phase III TRIBE trial, first-line therapy with FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab was associated with improved mPFS (12.1 months vs. 9.7 months) and response rate (65% vs. 53%) compared with FOLFIRI/bevacizumab; however, there was no difference in R0 resection rate between treatments (15% vs. 12%) [3]. A subsequent analysis showed significant improvement in median overall survival (OS) with FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab treatment (29.8 months vs. 25.8 months) [4]. Another phase II study evaluated panitumumab with FOLFOXIRI as first-line treatment with wild-type KRAS, HRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mCRC [5]. Thirty-three patients (89%) achieved objective response. Sixteen patients (43%) underwent resection of metastatic sites, with R0 resection performed in 13 patients (35%). Based on the potential for improved response rates, we conducted a phase II study of panitumumab plus FOLFOXIRI as first-line treatment for patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC with liver-only metastases. Patients were eligible regardless of whether they were considered surgical candidates at baseline. After the protocol was initiated, new findings were published indicating that RAS mutations outside of KRAS exon 2 are also associated with inferior survival with combination panitumumab and oxaliplatin-based therapy [6]. Enrollment was halted while patients in the study underwent expanded KRAS/NRAS analysis. Eight of the 15 patients consented to expanded analysis, with no additional mutations identified. Of the 12 patients evaluable for efficacy, 75% achieved a partial response (PR) (Table 1). Ten patients underwent surgery; all had complete resections that showed pathologic PR. No significant safety signals were seen; the most common treatment-related adverse events (all grades) were rash (80%), diarrhea (60%), fatigue (53%), and nausea (53%). Despite early closure of the study, this regimen is a viable option for patients with liver-only mCRC.
Table 1.

Summary of clinical activities

Trial Information

Colorectal cancer Metastatic / Advanced None Phase II Single Arm Overall Response Rate Rate of R0 resection Progression-Free Survival Acute Toxicity Produced by the Regimen Planned enrollment was originally 49 patients. Active and should be pursued further

Drug Information

Panitumumab Vectibix Amgen Antibody Epidermal growth factor receptor 6 mg/kg IV Day 1 of each 14-day cycle with FOLFOXIRI 5-FU 3,200 mg/m2, 48-hour continuous IV infusion Leucovorin 200 mg/m2 IV Irinotecan 125 mg/m2 Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV

Patient Characteristics

13 2 IV Median (range): 55 (39–70) Median (range): 0 0 — 12 1 — 3 2 — 0 3 — 0 Unknown — 0 Baseline surgical candidate – yes: 10 (67%) Baseline surgical candidate – no: 5 (33%) Adenocarinoma, 15

Primary Assessment Method

15 15 15 n = 0 (0%) n = 9 (60%) n = 3 (20%) n = 0 (0%) n = 3 (20%) 13.3060 months, CI: 95%

Adverse Events

Assessment, Analysis, and Discussion

Study terminated before completion Not Collected Active and should be pursued further It was estimated that in 2015 there would be approximately 132,700 new cases of colorectal cancer and 49,700 deaths due to this disease [1]. While surgical resection of metastases is sometimes curative, most patients with liver metastases are not considered resectable because of the number or location of the metastases. Advances in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), with increased response rates, can convert some patients with initially unresectable liver metastases to resectable, allowing for potentially curative treatment. In the phase II OLIVIA trial, patients with liver metastases from mCRC were randomized to bevacizumab plus modified folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or FOLFOXIRI [2]. Bevacizumab/FOLFOXIRI was associated with higher rates of response (81% vs. 62%) and resection (61% vs. 49%), and prolonged median progression-free survival (mPFS) (18.6 months vs. 11.5 months), compared with bevacizumab/mFOLFOX6. In the phase III TRIBE trial, first-line therapy with FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab was associated with improved mPFS (12.1 months vs. 9.7 months) and response rate (65% vs. 53%) compared with FOLFIRI/bevacizumab; however, there was no difference in R0 resection rate between treatments (15% vs. 12%) [3]. A subsequent analysis showed significant improvement in median overall survival (OS) with FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab treatment (29.8 months vs. 25.8 months) [4]. Another phase II study evaluated panitumumab with FOLFOXIRI as first-line treatment with wild-type KRAS, HRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mCRC [5]. Thirty-three patients (89%) achieved objective response. Sixteen patients (43%) underwent resection of metastatic sites, with R0 resection performed in 13 patients (35%). Based on the potential for improved response rates, we conducted a phase II study of panitumumab plus FOLFOXIRI as first-line treatment for patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC with liver-only metastases. Patients were eligible regardless of whether they were considered surgical candidates at baseline. After the protocol was initiated, new findings were published indicating that RAS mutations outside of KRAS exon 2 are also associated with inferior survival with combination panitumumab and oxaliplatin-based therapy [6]. Enrollment was halted while patients in the study underwent expanded KRAS/NRAS analysis. Figures 1 and 2 present PFS and OS data from our study. Eight of the 15 patients consented to expanded analysis, with no additional mutations identified. Of the 12 patients evaluable for efficacy, 75% achieved a partial response (PR) (Table 1). Ten patients underwent surgery; all had complete resections that showed pathologic PR. No significant safety signals were seen; the most common treatment-related adverse events (all grades) were rash (80%), diarrhea (60%), fatigue (53%), and nausea (53%) (Table 2). Despite early closure of the study, this regimen is a viable option for patients with liver-only mCRC.
Figure 1.

Progression-free survival (n = 15).

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; PFS, progression-free survival.

Figure 2.

Overall survival (n = 15).

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; NR, not reached; OS, overall survival.

Table 2.

Treatment-related adverse events (n = 15 patients)

  5 in total

1.  Panitumumab-FOLFOX4 treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Douillard; Kelly S Oliner; Salvatore Siena; Josep Tabernero; Ronald Burkes; Mario Barugel; Yves Humblet; Gyorgy Bodoky; David Cunningham; Jacek Jassem; Fernando Rivera; Ilona Kocákova; Paul Ruff; Maria Błasińska-Morawiec; Martin Šmakal; Jean Luc Canon; Mark Rother; Richard Williams; Alan Rong; Jeffrey Wiezorek; Roger Sidhu; Scott D Patterson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Initial therapy with FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Fotios Loupakis; Chiara Cremolini; Gianluca Masi; Sara Lonardi; Vittorina Zagonel; Lisa Salvatore; Enrico Cortesi; Gianluca Tomasello; Monica Ronzoni; Rosella Spadi; Alberto Zaniboni; Giuseppe Tonini; Angela Buonadonna; Domenico Amoroso; Silvana Chiara; Chiara Carlomagno; Corrado Boni; Giacomo Allegrini; Luca Boni; Alfredo Falcone
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Cancer statistics, 2015.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  FOLFOXIRI in combination with panitumumab as first-line treatment in quadruple wild-type (KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, BRAF) metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a phase II trial by the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest (GONO).

Authors:  L Fornaro; S Lonardi; G Masi; F Loupakis; F Bergamo; L Salvatore; C Cremolini; M Schirripa; C Vivaldi; G Aprile; A Zaniboni; S Bracarda; G Fontanini; E Sensi; C Lupi; M Morvillo; V Zagonel; A Falcone
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX-6 or FOLFOXIRI in patients with initially unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer: the OLIVIA multinational randomised phase II trial.

Authors:  T Gruenberger; J Bridgewater; I Chau; P García Alfonso; M Rivoire; S Mudan; S Lasserre; F Hermann; D Waterkamp; R Adam
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 32.976

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Characteristics of BRAF V600E Mutant, Deficient Mismatch Repair/Proficient Mismatch Repair, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Series of 287 Patients.

Authors:  Christelle de la Fouchardière; Romain Cohen; David Malka; Rosine Guimbaud; Héloïse Bourien; Astrid Lièvre; Wulfran Cacheux; Pascal Artru; Eric François; Marine Gilabert; Emmanuelle Samalin-Scalzi; Aziz Zaanan; Vincent Hautefeuille; Benoit Rousseau; Hélène Senellart; Romain Coriat; Ronan Flippot; Françoise Desseigne; Audrey Lardy-Cleaud; David Tougeron
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-05-31

2.  Establishing a colorectal cancer liver metastasis patient-derived tumor xenograft model for the evaluation of personalized chemotherapy.

Authors:  Joohee Jung; Jisup Kim; Hyun Kyung Lim; Kyoung Mee Kim; Yun Sun Lee; Joon Seong Park; Dong Sup Yoon
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 1.859

3.  Intensive first-line FIr-C/FOx-C association of triplet chemotherapy plus cetuximab in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients: preliminary phase II data and prediction of individual limiting toxicity syndromes by pharmacogenomic biomarkers.

Authors:  Gemma Bruera; Silvia Massacese; Francesco Pepe; Umberto Malapelle; Antonella Dal Mas; Eugenio Ciacco; Giuseppe Calvisi; Giancarlo Troncone; Maurizio Simmaco; Enrico Ricevuto
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 8.168

4.  Efficacy and safety of triplet chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR agents in metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qian Wu; Huan Wang; Suqin Zhang; Yifei Zeng; Wei Yang; Wenjun Pan; Guodai Hong; Wenbin Gao
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 3.253

5.  The impact of panitumumab treatment on survival and quality of life in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Francesca Battaglin; Alberto Puccini; Selma Ahcene Djaballah; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  Toxicity Syndromes, Patient-Related Clinical Indicator of Toxicity Burden Induced by Intensive Triplet Chemotherapy-Based Regimens in Gastrointestinal Cancers With Metastatic Disease.

Authors:  Gemma Bruera; Enrico Ricevuto
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 6.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.