N Aujla1,2,3, M Walker2, N Sprigg3, K Abrams4, A Massey5, K Vedhara1. 1. a Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham , Nottingham , UK. 2. b Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing , University of Nottingham , Nottingham , UK. 3. d Division of Clinical Neurosciences, Stroke , University of Nottingham , Nottingham , UK. 4. e Department of Health Sciences , University of Leicester , Leicester , UK. 5. c School of Clinical Sciences , University of Nottingham , Nottingham , UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether people's beliefs about their illness, conceptualised by the common sense model (CSM), can prospectively predict adherence to self-management behaviours (including, attendance, medication, diet and exercise) in adults with acute and chronic physical illnesses. DESIGN AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Electronic databases were searched in September 2014, for papers specifying the use of the 'CSM' in relation to 'self-management', 'rehabilitation' and 'adherence' in the context of physical illness. Six hundred abstracts emerged. Data from 52 relevant studies were extracted. Twenty-one studies were meta-analysed, using correlation coefficients in random effects models. The remainder were descriptively synthesised. RESULTS: The effect sizes for individual illness belief domains and adherence to self-management behaviours ranged from .04 to .13, indicating very weak, predictive relationships. Further analysis revealed that predictive relationships did not differ by the: type of self-management behaviour; acute or chronic illness; or duration of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Individual illness belief domains, outlined by the CSM, did not predict adherence to self-management behaviours in adults with physical illnesses. Prospective relationships, controlling for past behaviour, also did not emerge. Other factors, including patients' treatment beliefs and inter-relationships between individual illness beliefs domains, may have influenced potential associations with adherence to self-management behaviours.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether people's beliefs about their illness, conceptualised by the common sense model (CSM), can prospectively predict adherence to self-management behaviours (including, attendance, medication, diet and exercise) in adults with acute and chronic physical illnesses. DESIGN AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Electronic databases were searched in September 2014, for papers specifying the use of the 'CSM' in relation to 'self-management', 'rehabilitation' and 'adherence' in the context of physical illness. Six hundred abstracts emerged. Data from 52 relevant studies were extracted. Twenty-one studies were meta-analysed, using correlation coefficients in random effects models. The remainder were descriptively synthesised. RESULTS: The effect sizes for individual illness belief domains and adherence to self-management behaviours ranged from .04 to .13, indicating very weak, predictive relationships. Further analysis revealed that predictive relationships did not differ by the: type of self-management behaviour; acute or chronic illness; or duration of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Individual illness belief domains, outlined by the CSM, did not predict adherence to self-management behaviours in adults with physical illnesses. Prospective relationships, controlling for past behaviour, also did not emerge. Other factors, including patients' treatment beliefs and inter-relationships between individual illness beliefs domains, may have influenced potential associations with adherence to self-management behaviours.
Entities:
Keywords:
adherence; common sense model; illness beliefs; self-management; self-regulation theory; systematic review
Authors: Belen Rojano; Erin West; Emily Goodman; Jeffrey J Weiss; Rafael E de la Hoz; Michael Crane; Laura Crowley; Denise Harrison; Steven Markowitz; Juan P Wisnivesky Journal: J Asthma Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 2.515
Authors: Travis D Westbrook; Eleshia J Morrison; Kami J Maddocks; Farrukh T Awan; Jeffrey A Jones; Jennifer A Woyach; Amy J Johnson; John C Byrd; Barbara L Andersen Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2019-08-16
Authors: David Dias Neto; Ana Nunes da Silva; Magda Sofia Roberto; Jelena Lubenko; Marios Constantinou; Christiana Nicolaou; Demetris Lamnisos; Savvas Papacostas; Stefan Höfer; Giovambattista Presti; Valeria Squatrito; Vasilis S Vasiliou; Louise McHugh; Jean-Louis Monestès; Adriana Baban; Javier Alvarez-Galvez; Marisa Paez-Blarrina; Francisco Montesinos; Sonsoles Valdivia-Salas; Dorottya Ori; Raimo Lappalainen; Bartosz Kleszcz; Andrew Gloster; Maria Karekla; Angelos P Kassianos Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2021-04-14