Literature DB >> 26910946

Where have all the people gone? Enhancing global conservation using night lights and social media.

Noam Levin, Salit Kark, David Crandall.   

Abstract

Conservation prioritization at large scales is complex, combining biological, environmental, and social factors. While conservation scientists now more often aim to incorporate human-related factors, a critical yet unquantified challenge remains: to identify which areas people use for recreation outside urban centers. To address this gap in applied ecology and conservation, we developed a novel approach for quantifying human presence beyond populated areas by combining social media "big data" and remote sensing tools. We used data from the Flickr photo-sharing website as a surrogate for identifying spatial variation in visitation globally, and complemented this estimate with spatially explicit information on stable night lights between 2004 and 2012, used as a proxy for identifying urban and industrial centers. Natural and seminatural areas attracting visitors were defined as areas both highly photographed and non-lit. The number of Flickr photographers within protected areas was found to be a reliable surrogate for estimating visitor numbers as confirmed by local authority censuses (r = 0.8). Half of all visitors' photos taken in protected areas originated from under 1% of all protected areas on Earth (250 of -27 000). The most photographed protected areas globally included Yosemite and Yellowstone National Parks (USA), and the Lake and Peak Districts (UK). Factors explaining the spatial variation in protected areas Flickr photo coverage included their type (e.g., UNESCO World Heritage sites have higher visitation) and accessibility to roads and trails. Using this approach, we identified photography hotspots, which draw many visitors and are also unlit (i.e., are located outside urban centers), but currently remain largely unprotected, such as Brazil's Pantanal and Bolivia's Salar de Uyuni. The integrated big data approach developed here demonstrates the benefits of combining remote sensing sources and novel geo-tagged and crowd-sourced information from social media in future efforts to identify spatial conservation gaps and pressures in real time, and their spatial and temporal variation globally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26910946     DOI: 10.1890/15-0113.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  10 in total

1.  Using crowd-sourced photos to assess seasonal patterns of visitor use in mountain-protected areas.

Authors:  Chelsey Walden-Schreiner; Sebastian Dario Rossi; Agustina Barros; Catherine Pickering; Yu-Fai Leung
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Mapping Potential Environmental Impacts from Tourists Using Data from Social Media: A Case Study in the Westfjords of Iceland.

Authors:  Brack W Hale
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Social media reveal that charismatic species are not the main attractor of ecotourists to sub-Saharan protected areas.

Authors:  Anna Hausmann; Tuuli Toivonen; Vuokko Heikinheimo; Henrikki Tenkanen; Rob Slotow; Enrico Di Minin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Is open defaecation in outdoor recreation and camping areas a public health issue in Australia? A literature review.

Authors:  Leah C Stevenson; Tammy Allen; Diana Mendez; David Sellars; Gillian S Gould
Journal:  Health Promot J Austr       Date:  2019-10-31

5.  Next-generation visitation models using social media to estimate recreation on public lands.

Authors:  Spencer A Wood; Samantha G Winder; Emilia H Lia; Eric M White; Christian S L Crowley; Adam A Milnor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  A 24-hour population distribution dataset based on mobile phone data from Helsinki Metropolitan Area, Finland.

Authors:  Claudia Bergroth; Olle Järv; Henrikki Tenkanen; Matti Manninen; Tuuli Toivonen
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 6.444

7.  Classifying and Mapping Cultural Ecosystem Services Using Artificial Intelligence and Social Media Data.

Authors:  Ikram Mouttaki; Ingrida Bagdanavičiūtė; Mohamed Maanan; Mohammed Erraiss; Hassan Rhinane; Mehdi Maanan
Journal:  Wetlands (Wilmington)       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 2.074

8.  Instagram, Flickr, or Twitter: Assessing the usability of social media data for visitor monitoring in protected areas.

Authors:  Henrikki Tenkanen; Enrico Di Minin; Vuokko Heikinheimo; Anna Hausmann; Marna Herbst; Liisa Kajala; Tuuli Toivonen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Using social media to quantify spatial and temporal dynamics of nature-based recreational activities.

Authors:  Francesca Mancini; George M Coghill; David Lusseau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Multiscale socio-ecological networks in the age of information.

Authors:  Maxime Lenormand; Sandra Luque; Johannes Langemeyer; Patrizia Tenerelli; Grazia Zulian; Inge Aalders; Serban Chivulescu; Pedro Clemente; Jan Dick; Jiska van Dijk; Michiel van Eupen; Relu C Giuca; Leena Kopperoinen; Eszter Lellei-Kovács; Michael Leone; Juraj Lieskovský; Uta Schirpke; Alison C Smith; Ulrike Tappeiner; Helen Woods
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.