Literature DB >> 26910706

A Closer Look at the 2013 to 2014 Integrated Plastic Surgery Match.

Russell E Kling1, Rochelle R Kling, Chika Agi, Alexander Toirac, Ernest K Manders.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Plastic surgery has become an increasingly competitive, yet limited information is available in the literature on successfully matched plastic surgery applicants. The goal of this study was to analyze which factors predicted a successful National Residency Match Program match during the 2013 to 2014 cycle.
METHODS: An electronic questionnaire was distributed to successfully matched medical students in plastic surgery. Information obtained included (1) academic performance, (2) medical school criteria, (3) visiting subinternship rotation criteria, and (4) research performance. Match "success" was defined as matching into one of the applicant's top three ranked programs
RESULTS: Data were available for 127 matched students. Average Step 1 score was 247.93 (95 percent CI, 244.3 to 251.56). Step 1 scores correlated with the number of interviews received (r(2) = 0.355; p = 0.039). An odds ratio of 2.2 was observed for residents who had a plastic surgery residency program affiliated with their medical school and match success. Step 1 score (r(2) = 0.045; p = 0.798), Step 2 score (r(2) = 0.131; p = 0.505), Alpha Omega Alpha membership (r(2) = 0.011; p = 0.905), and number of publications (r(2) = 0.121; p = 0.458) did not correlate significantly with match success.
CONCLUSIONS: Successful applicants had a Step 1 score that was 1 SD greater than the U.S. mean. Having a plastic surgery residency program affiliated with an applicant's medical school was an important predictor of match success. Objective measures (step scores, Alpha Omega Alpha membership, and number of publications) were not predictive of match success.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26910706     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000475824.09531.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

1.  Evaluating the Importance of Sub-Internships on the 2022 Integrated Plastic Surgery Match During Continued COVID-19 Regulations.

Authors:  Lauren M Sinik; Katie G Egan; Alexis K Bagwell; Allison C Nauta; James A Butterworth
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Plastic Surgery Match Rates.

Authors:  Christopher D Lopez; Alisa Girard; Jonathan M Bekisz; Visakha Suresh; Robin Yang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 5.169

3.  International Medical Graduates in the US Plastic Surgery Residency: Characteristics of Successful Applicants.

Authors:  George Kokosis; Angelo A Leto Barone; Michael J Grzelak; Sara Alfadil; Edward H Davidson; Scott Lifchez; Amir H Dorafshar
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2018-11-27

4.  Implications of Pass/Fail Step 1 Scoring: Plastic Surgery Program Director and Applicant Perspective.

Authors:  Lawrence O Lin; Alan T Makhoul; Paige N Hackenberger; Nishant Ganesh Kumar; Anna R Schoenbrunner; Matthew E Pontell; Brian C Drolet; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-12-17

5.  COVID-19 Effects on 2021 Home Program Match Rates at Integrated Plastic Surgery Programs.

Authors:  Katie G Egan; Allison Nauta; James A Butterworth
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.169

6.  Effect of COVID-19 Restrictions on 2021 Integrated Plastic Surgery Match Outcomes.

Authors:  Katie G Egan; Allison Nauta; James A Butterworth
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.891

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.