Literature DB >> 26910655

Surgically Treated Hernia following Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Prevalence, Outcomes, and Expenditures.

Valeriy Shubinets1, Justin P Fox, Jonathan R Sarik, Stephen J Kovach, John P Fischer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Donor-site hernia is one of the most feared complications following abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction. The authors aim to assess the incidence of surgically repaired abdominal hernia across different types of abdominally based breast reconstruction, identify predictive perioperative factors, and estimate the health care charges associated with this morbidity.
METHODS: Using inpatient and ambulatory surgery data from four states in the United States, the authors identified adult women who underwent pedicled transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM), free TRAM, or deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction between 2008 and 2012. The primary outcome was surgical repair of abdominal hernia within 4 years. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to compare outcomes between groups.
RESULTS: The final sample included 8246 women who underwent pedicled TRAM (29.2 percent), free TRAM (30.0 percent), or DIEP (40.8 percent) flap reconstruction. The frequency of surgically repaired abdominal hernia following breast reconstruction was highest among the pedicled TRAM flap group (pedicled TRAM, 7.0 percent; free TRAM, 5.7 percent; DIEP, 1.8 percent). A hospital encounter for hernia repair, whether inpatient or ambulatory, generated substantial health care charges (pedicled TRAM, $39,704; free TRAM, $48,378; DIEP, $46,481). On multivariate analysis, patients who developed a surgical-site infection within 30 days of discharge (incidence rate ratio, 1.99; 95 percent CI, 1.44 to 2.75) had a higher incidence of surgically repaired abdominal hernia.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgically repaired abdominal hernia is common following abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction and is associated with significant health care expenditures. The authors demonstrate that the amount of rectus muscle sacrificed correlates to the likelihood of developing a surgically repaired abdominal hernia, and identify surgical-site infection as a predictive perioperative factor. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26910655     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000479931.96538.c5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  10 in total

Review 1.  Morbidity of the Donor Site and Complication Rates of Breast Reconstruction with Autologous Abdominal Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hatan Mortada; Taif Fawaz AlNojaidi; Razan AlRabah; Yousif Almohammadi; Raghad AlKhashan; Hattan Aljaaly
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 2.269

2.  Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes after Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.

Authors:  Jessica Erdmann-Sager; Edwin G Wilkins; Andrea L Pusic; Ji Qi; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Gretchen E Guldbrandsen; Yoon S Chun
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  A systematic review of donor site aesthetic and complications after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Nicole Lindenblatt; Lisanne Gruenherz; Jian Farhadi
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-08

Review 4.  Laparoscopic Harvesting of Omental Flaps for Breast Reconstruction-A Review of the Literature and Outcome Analysis.

Authors:  Hani Shash; Becher Al-Halabi; Salah Aldekhayel; Tassos Dionisopoulos
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 0.947

5.  Spontaneous rupture of abdominal wall after breast reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric perforator flap following mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Jun Iwabu; Tsutomu Namikawa; Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Kazune Fujisawa; Toyokazu Oki; Maho Ogawa; Natsuko Iwai; Akiko Yano; Motone Kuriyama; Takeki Sugimoto; Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2018-07-31

6.  Pelvic/Perineal Reconstruction: Time to Consider the Anterolateral Thigh Flap as a First-line Option?

Authors:  David Perrault; Cindy Kin; Derrick C Wan; Natalie Kirilcuk; Andrew Shelton; Arash Momeni
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-04-24

7.  Myth-Busting the DIEP Flap and an Introduction to the Abdominal Perforator Exchange (APEX) Breast Reconstruction Technique: A Single-Surgeon Retrospective Review.

Authors:  Frank J DellaCroce; Hannah C DellaCroce; Craig A Blum; Scott K Sullivan; Christopher G Trahan; M Whitten Wise; Irena G Brates
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Breast Reconstruction in Obese Patients: The Fat Grafted Latissimus versus Abdominal Free Tissue Transfer.

Authors:  Matthew D Novak; Jordan T Blough; Jasson T Abraham; Hope D Shin; Tai Yasuda; Donna Ayala; Andrew M Altman; Michel Saint-Cyr
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-03-20

9.  Interdisciplinary Treatment of Breast Cancer After Mastectomy With Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using Abdominal Free Flaps in a University Teaching Hospital-A Standardized and Safe Procedure.

Authors:  Dominik Steiner; Raymund E Horch; Ingo Ludolph; Marweh Schmitz; Justus P Beier; Andreas Arkudas
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Complications and Patient-reported Outcomes after TRAM and DIEP Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Waverley Y He; Leen El Eter; Pooja Yesantharao; Bethany Hung; Haley Owens; Sarah Persing; Justin M Sacks
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-10-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.