| Literature DB >> 26910518 |
Nan Lv1, Chi Wang1, Christof Karmonik2, Yibin Fang1, Jinyu Xu1, Ying Yu1, Wei Cao1, Jianmin Liu1, Qinghai Huang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26910518 PMCID: PMC4766191 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149906
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Definitions of Morphological Parameters.
Size of aneurysm dome = Dmax; aspect ratio (AR) = Height/Neck; size ratio (SR) = 6Dmax/(D1+D2+D3+D4+D5+D6); dome-to-neck ratio (DN) = Dmax/Neck; bottleneck factor (BN) = Width/Neck.
Clinical, morphological and hemodynamic characteristics of PCoA aneurysms.
| Ruptured | Unruptured | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | N = 85 | N = 44 | P Value |
| Age | 58 (41, 64) | 62 (55, 67) | 0.118 |
| Male | 18 (21.2) | 11 (25.0) | 0.660 |
| Hypertension | 38 (44.7) | 22 (50.0) | 0.568 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 5 (5.9) | 7 (15.9) | 0.063 |
| Antithrombotic agent | 6 (7.1) | 6 (13.6) | 0.368 |
| Current smoking | 6 (7.1) | 2 (4.5) | 0.860 |
| Familial SAH | 11 (12.9) | 5 (11.4) | 0.797 |
| Oculomotor nerve palsy | 14 (16.5) | 3 (6.8) | 0.124 |
| Fetal type PCoA | 29 (34.1) | 19 (43.2) | 0.313 |
| Size, mm | 4.864 (3.960, 6.563) | 4.251 (2.622, 5.398) | 0.002 |
| Aspect ratio (AR) | 1.180 (0.892, 1.516) | 0.862 (0.689, 1.128) | <0.001 |
| Size ratio (SR) | 1.857 (1.416, 2.462) | 1.461 (0.907, 1.885) | 0.001 |
| Dome-to-neck Ratio (DN) | 1.263 (0.991, 1.735) | 0.990 (0.829, 1.206) | <0.001 |
| Bottle-neck Ratio (BN) | 1.185 (1.036, 1.416) | 1.095 (0.896, 1.346) | 0.080 |
| Inflow angle (IA) | 119.7 (104.3, 132.3) | 98.7 (89.3, 118.1) | <0.001 |
| Normalized WSS (NWSS) | 0.562 (0.415, 0.827) | 0.791 (0.580, 1.014) | 0.002 |
| Oscillatory shear index (OSI) | 0.016 (0.010, 0.034) | 0.015 (0.005, 0.025) | 0.183 |
| Percentage of low WSS area (LSA) | 0.029 (0.001, 0.086) | 0.004 (0.000, 0.032) | <0.001 |
Variables were expressed as median (interquartile range), or number of patients (%).
SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; PCoA, posterior communicating artery aneurysm; WSS, wall shear stress.
Fig 2Hemodynamic patterns of two representative posterior communicating artery (PCoA) aneurysms.
A: ruptured PCoA aneurysm with a higher inflow angle (IA, 129°); B: unruptured PCoA with a lower IA (63°). From left to right: (1) Three-dimensional models and measurement of IA; (2) distribution of wall shear stress (WSS); (3) distribution of oscillatory shear index (OSI); (4) flow pattern at the systolic peak.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of parameters associated with rupture status of PCoA aneurysms.
| Variables | Odds Ratio | 95%CI | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inflow angle | 1.539 | 1.239–1.911 | <0.001 |
| Percentage of low WSS area (LSA) | 1.393 | 1.013–1.915 | 0.041 |
PCoA, Posterior communicating artery aneurysm; WSS, wall shear stress.