Literature DB >> 26910032

Emesis as a Screening Diagnostic for Low Dose Rate (LDR) Total Body Radiation Exposure.

Andrew S Camarata1, Jeffrey M Switchenko, Eugene Demidenko, Ann B Flood, Harold M Swartz, Arif N Ali.   

Abstract

Current radiation disaster manuals list the time-to-emesis (TE) as the key triage indicator of radiation dose. The data used to support TE recommendations were derived primarily from nearly instantaneous, high dose-rate exposures as part of variable condition accident databases. To date, there has not been a systematic differentiation between triage dose estimates associated with high and low dose rate (LDR) exposures, even though it is likely that after a nuclear detonation or radiologic disaster, many surviving casualties would have received a significant portion of their total exposure from fallout (LDR exposure) rather than from the initial nuclear detonation or criticality event (high dose rate exposure). This commentary discusses the issues surrounding the use of emesis as a screening diagnostic for radiation dose after LDR exposure. As part of this discussion, previously published clinical data on emesis after LDR total body irradiation (TBI) is statistically re-analyzed as an illustration of the complexity of the issue and confounding factors. This previously published data includes 107 patients who underwent TBI up to 10.5 Gy in a single fraction delivered over several hours at 0.02 to 0.04 Gy min. Estimates based on these data for the sensitivity of emesis as a screening diagnostic for the low dose rate radiation exposure range from 57.1% to 76.6%, and the estimates for specificity range from 87.5% to 99.4%. Though the original data contain multiple confounding factors, the evidence regarding sensitivity suggests that emesis appears to be quite poor as a medical screening diagnostic for LDR exposures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26910032      PMCID: PMC4770573          DOI: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  11 in total

1.  Fractionated high dose rate versus low dose rate regimens for intracavitary brachytherapy of the cervix. I. General considerations based on radiobiology.

Authors:  D J Brenner; E J Hall
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Nuclear terrorism: triage and medical management of radiation and combined-injury casualties.

Authors:  Daniel F Flynn; Ronald E Goans
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Estimating radiation dose from time to emesis and lymphocyte depletion.

Authors:  Denise D Parker; Jack C Parker
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  Medical management of radiological casualties.

Authors:  Ronald E Goans; Jamie K Waselenko
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 5.  Dose fractionation, dose rate and iso-effect relationships for normal tissue responses.

Authors:  G W Barendsen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 6.  Radiation dose-rate: a factor of importance in radiobiology and radiotherapy.

Authors:  E J Hall
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  The dose-rate effect in human tumour cells.

Authors:  G G Steel; J M Deacon; G M Duchesne; A Horwich; L R Kelland; J H Peacock
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Vomiting associated with whole body irradiation.

Authors:  C Westbrook; J Glaholm; A Barrett
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  Radiation dose prediction using data on time to emesis in the case of nuclear terrorism.

Authors:  Eugene Demidenko; Benjamin B Williams; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Dose-rate effects and the repair of radiation damage.

Authors:  G G Steel; J D Down; J H Peacock; T C Stephens
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 6.280

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluating the Special Needs of The Military for Radiation Biodosimetry for Tactical Warfare Against Deployed Troops: Comparing Military to Civilian Needs for Biodosimetry Methods.

Authors:  Ann Barry Flood; Arif N Ali; Holly K Boyle; Gaixin Du; Victoria A Satinsky; Steven G Swarts; Benjamin B Williams; Eugene Demidenko; Wilson Schreiber; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 2.  Nuclear and Radiological Emergencies: Biological Effects, Countermeasures and Biodosimetry.

Authors:  Elena Obrador; Rosario Salvador-Palmer; Juan I Villaescusa; Eduardo Gallego; Blanca Pellicer; José M Estrela; Alegría Montoro
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.