Literature DB >> 26909672

High-resolution microbiota flow cytometry reveals dynamic colitis-associated changes in fecal bacterial composition.

Jakob Zimmermann1, Thomas Hübschmann2, Florian Schattenberg2, Joachim Schumann2, Pawel Durek1, René Riedel1, Marie Friedrich3, Rainer Glauben3, Britta Siegmund3, Andreas Radbruch1, Susann Müller2, Hyun-Dong Chang1.   

Abstract

Using high-resolution flow cytometry of bacterial shape (forward scatter) and DNA content (DAPI staining), we detected dramatic differences in the fecal microbiota composition during murine colitis that were validated using 16S rDNA sequencing. This innovative method provides a fast and inexpensive tool to interrogate the microbiota on the single-cell level.
© 2016 The Authors. European Journal of Immunology published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flow cytometry; IBD; Microbiota; Single-cell analysis; T-cell transfer colitis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26909672      PMCID: PMC5084791          DOI: 10.1002/eji.201646297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Immunol        ISSN: 0014-2980            Impact factor:   5.532


For the determination of the complexity of the microbiota, we have developed an approach based on high‐resolution flow cytometric determination of bacterial forward scatter and DNA content. This analysis resolves up to 80 different populations per fecal microbiota. Individual populations are phylogenetically homogeneous and their frequencies change dramatically when monitored in the course of murine T‐cell transfer‐induced colitis. High‐resolution flow cytometry of the microbiota provides a fast and inexpensive tool for the analysis of the microbiota and offers the unique opportunity to isolate defined bacterial populations for further molecular and functional analysis. The mammalian gut is colonized by a myriad of microbes referred to as the commensal microbiota. It has been estimated that the human intestine harbors a total number of 1013 bacteria. Recent evidence suggests that 99% of the total human microbiota are comprised of 66 species and that 75% of each individual's microbiota are composed of about 40 different species 1, 2. These bacteria are not only important for nutrient metabolism but also for the development and homeostasis of the immune system 3, 4. Pathological changes in the composition of the microbiota, known as dysbiosis, are suggested to contribute to an array of diseases including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), arthritis, encephalitis, and cancer 5. Up‐to‐date few technologies for the determination of the composition of the microbiota exist. Classical microbiological technologies such as in vitro cultivation are confined to a few species. With the advent of high‐throughput sequencing the profiling of the commensal microbiota by 16s rDNA or metagenome sequencing has become the current standard in the field, but it is time and labor intensive 6. While sequencing can provide information on the taxonomy of the microbiota, it tends to overestimate the microbial diversity 1 and is not easy to standardize 7. Here, we introduce a method based on the flow cytometric measurement of light scattering and DNA content to analyze the heterogeneity and dynamic changes of the intestinal microbiota. In the murine model of T‐cell transfer‐induced colitis 8, we could demonstrate that overall microbial diversity decreases and that changes in the composition of the fecal microbiota in colitis coincide with weight loss and diarrhea. Colitis was induced by transfer of 4 × 105 CD4+CD45RBhi Th cells into Rag1 −/− recipients. Colitis was characterized by weight loss, diarrhea, and histopathological changes of the colonic mucosa (Supporting Information Fig. 1). To analyze colitis‐associated changes in the composition of the microbiota at the level of single bacterial cells, fecal bacteria were harvested before induction of colitis and during established colitis, formaldehyde‐fixed, Tween‐permeabilized, stained with DAPI, and analyzed by flow cytometry. According to forward scatter (FSC) and DNA content (DAPI staining) of the fecal bacteria, discrete populations of the microbiotic community were detectable (Fig. 1A). For quantitative assessment of the changes measured by flow cytometry between the different samples, we used the cytometric barcoding (flowCyBar) approach 9 for which we defined a gate template composed of all gates occurring in any of the samples of the study (Fig. 1A, right panel and Supporting Information Fig. 2 for gating and numbering). In established colitis, the frequencies of bacteria in four gates defined by flowCyBar significantly increased, while in 19 others frequencies significantly decreased, as compared with the microbiota of the same mice before induction of colitis (Fig. 1B, Supporting Information File 2). Comparing the frequencies of bacteria in all of the 80 gates of 12 healthy and 11 colitic mice by nonmetric, multidimensional scaling allowed the unambiguous distinction between colitic and healthy mice (Fig. 1C). Similarly, using an unbiased comparison approach, the cytometric histogram image comparison (CHIC) algorithm 10, the microbiota of healthy versus colitic mice was clearly distinguishable (Supporting Information Fig. 3).
Figure 1

Flow cytometry detects dynamic changes in the microbiota during colitis. Colitis was induced by i.v. transfer of 4 × 105 CD4+ CD45RBhi T cells into Rag1−/− recipients. Fecal bacteria were stained with DAPI and analyzed by flow cytometry as detailed in the Materials and methods provided in the supplemental information. (A) Representative plots of bacterial forward scatter (FSC, x‐axis) and DNA content (DAPI, y‐axis) of the fecal microbiota in healthy mice (upper panel) and during colitis (lower panel) without (left) and with (right) electronic gates. The two white spots mark the area of the control beads, 0.5 and 1 μm diameter which were gated out electronically (See Supporting Information Fig. 2 for full gating strategy). (B) Frequencies of events in gates shown in (A) for healthy and colitic mice filtered for significantly different gates and sorted for FDR‐adjusted p‐value depicted as median and 25th/75th percentile (box) and min/max values (whiskers). Data show n = 12 healthy mice and n = 11 mice after colitis onset pooled from three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 by Student's t‐test for independent samples and Benjamini–Hochberg FDR adjustment. (C) Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot for n = 12 healthy mice and n = 11 mice after colitis onset (same as for (A) and (B)). (D) Frequencies of fecal bacteria in selected populations analyzed at days 0, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 15 after colitis induction in four individual mice (black lines and symbols, mean ± SEM, left y‐axis). Means ± SEM of relative weight (gray line, right y‐axis) and diarrhea score (gray dashed, left y‐axis). Shown is one representative experiment of two experiments with comparable results.

Flow cytometry detects dynamic changes in the microbiota during colitis. Colitis was induced by i.v. transfer of 4 × 105 CD4+ CD45RBhi T cells into Rag1−/− recipients. Fecal bacteria were stained with DAPI and analyzed by flow cytometry as detailed in the Materials and methods provided in the supplemental information. (A) Representative plots of bacterial forward scatter (FSC, x‐axis) and DNA content (DAPI, y‐axis) of the fecal microbiota in healthy mice (upper panel) and during colitis (lower panel) without (left) and with (right) electronic gates. The two white spots mark the area of the control beads, 0.5 and 1 μm diameter which were gated out electronically (See Supporting Information Fig. 2 for full gating strategy). (B) Frequencies of events in gates shown in (A) for healthy and colitic mice filtered for significantly different gates and sorted for FDR‐adjusted p‐value depicted as median and 25th/75th percentile (box) and min/max values (whiskers). Data show n = 12 healthy mice and n = 11 mice after colitis onset pooled from three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 by Student's t‐test for independent samples and Benjamini–Hochberg FDR adjustment. (C) Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot for n = 12 healthy mice and n = 11 mice after colitis onset (same as for (A) and (B)). (D) Frequencies of fecal bacteria in selected populations analyzed at days 0, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 15 after colitis induction in four individual mice (black lines and symbols, mean ± SEM, left y‐axis). Means ± SEM of relative weight (gray line, right y‐axis) and diarrhea score (gray dashed, left y‐axis). Shown is one representative experiment of two experiments with comparable results. Changes in the microbiota composition coincided with clinical signs of colitis, i.e. weight loss and diarrhea. Weight loss and diarrhea developed between day 6 and 10 after T‐cell transfer (Fig. 1D). The populations of gates 44, 63, and 70 started to contract at day 6 and were almost absent on day 10. Cell populations in three gates (57, 71, and 77) that were increased in established colitis, started to expand at day 6. Evidently, dysbiosis coincides with the clinical manifestation of colitis. Together, these data demonstrate that high‐resolution flow cytometry of bacterial size and DNA content allows for the rapid detection of dynamic changes of the fecal microbiota composition during colonic inflammation. The dysbiosis was validated by the current gold standard, 16s rDNA sequencing, before and during established colitis. Similarly to the cytometric assessment, the overall microbial diversity was reduced in colitic mice, as compared with healthy mice, as indicated by a decreased Shannon index and smaller numbers of different species found in the rarefraction analysis (Supporting Information Fig. 4 and File 3). To identify the bacteria contained in distinct cytometric gates, we sorted 5 × 105 bacterial cells from representative gates (Supporting Information Fig. 5) and determined their composition by 16s rDNA sequencing. As indicated in Fig. 2A, all sorted populations of the microbiota were composed to at least 50% of one single genus (Fig. 2A, Supporting Information Fig. 6 and File 3).
Figure 2

Electronic gates comprise distinct bacterial phyla. Bacteria were sorted by FACS from the feces of n = 3 individual mice before and/or after the onset of T‐cell transfer‐induced colitis. Isolated DNA was analyzed by next‐generation sequencing and classified with the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) as specified in the Materials and methods provided in the supplemental information. (A) 16s rDNA sequence analysis of flow‐sorted populations of fecal bacteria from n = 3 individual mice (same individuals as for Supporting Information Fig. 4) before and/or after the onset of T‐cell transfer colitis. Depicted is the phylogenetic composition of the gates as median frequencies of bacterial taxa that make up ≥ 50% of at least one of the sorted populations. (See Supporting Information Fig. 6 for detailed composition) (B) Frequencies of events in cytometric gates (black symbols) and corresponding frequencies of 16s rDNA reads (gray symbols) for the taxa identified in (A) in n = 3 individual healthy mice (filled circles) and after the onset of colitis (filled rectangles).

Electronic gates comprise distinct bacterial phyla. Bacteria were sorted by FACS from the feces of n = 3 individual mice before and/or after the onset of T‐cell transfer‐induced colitis. Isolated DNA was analyzed by next‐generation sequencing and classified with the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) as specified in the Materials and methods provided in the supplemental information. (A) 16s rDNA sequence analysis of flow‐sorted populations of fecal bacteria from n = 3 individual mice (same individuals as for Supporting Information Fig. 4) before and/or after the onset of T‐cell transfer colitis. Depicted is the phylogenetic composition of the gates as median frequencies of bacterial taxa that make up ≥ 50% of at least one of the sorted populations. (See Supporting Information Fig. 6 for detailed composition) (B) Frequencies of events in cytometric gates (black symbols) and corresponding frequencies of 16s rDNA reads (gray symbols) for the taxa identified in (A) in n = 3 individual healthy mice (filled circles) and after the onset of colitis (filled rectangles). Gates 44 and 70, populated only in healthy mice, were composed to 88 and 78%, respectively, of Lachnospiraceae (Fig. 2A, Supporting Information File 3). Gate 63, also only populated in healthy mice, consisted to 75% of the genus Alistipes. Gates 32/41/18, populated only in colitic mice, were composed to 73% of the genus Blautia. The composition of gate 14, populated in healthy and colitic mice, changed upon induction of colitis, in that in healthy mice, 57% of the bacteria belonged to the genus Barnesiella, and after induction of colitis, 80% belonged to the genus Enterobacter. The changes in the cytometric gates 44, 70, 63, and 32/41/18 and the overall changes of the microbiome according to 16s rDNA sequencing of healthy versus colitic mice were similar (Fig. 2B, Supporting Information Files 2 and 3). Whereas gates 44 and 70 showed a median reduction of 150‐fold and 28‐fold, respectively, their main constituting taxon unclassified Lachnospiraceae was reduced 40‐fold, according to 16s rDNA sequencing. The frequency of events in gate 63 decreased 30‐fold in colitis, while its constituting genus Alistipes was reduced ninefold in the microbiome. The 1.6‐fold expansion of events in gates 32/41/18 in colitis was paralleled by a 16‐fold increase in Blautia 16s rDNA, the prevailing genus found in that gate. While the frequency of events in gate 14 did not differ between healthy mice and colitic mice, the changes in its composition paralleled those detectable by 16s rDNA sequencing of the entire microbiome. Enterobacter 16s rDNA increased in colitis in total fecal bacteria from below 1 to 21%. Conversely, 16s rDNA of Barnesiella, the main constituent of gate 14 in healthy mice, dropped 13‐fold in colitic microbiomes. Taken together, 16s rDNA sequencing confirmed the relative colitis‐accompanying changes in the fecal microbiota composition detected by flow cytometry. In summary, we show here for the first time, that flow cytometry offers unique options to analyze the heterogeneity of the intestinal microbiota. We have used this cytometric approach for the profiling of the microbiota from healthy and colitic mice. We were able to discriminate up to 80 distinct populations per microbiome, most of which had a rather homogenous phylogenetic composition. When compared with the current gold standard, 16s rDNA sequencing, our flow cytometric approach revealed similar relative changes in the fecal microbiota composition upon colitis. Flow cytometry of the microbiota thus qualifies for high‐throughput clinical studies that aim at linking dynamic changes in the fecal microbiota to diagnosis and prognosis of diseases.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no financial or commercial conflict of interest. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Supporting information Click here for additional data file. Supporting information Click here for additional data file. Supporting information Click here for additional data file. Supporting information Click here for additional data file.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Role of the gut microbiota in human nutrition and metabolism.

Authors:  Balakrishnan S Ramakrishna
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.029

2.  Cytometric fingerprinting for analyzing microbial intracommunity structure variation and identifying subcommunity function.

Authors:  Christin Koch; Susanne Günther; Adey F Desta; Thomas Hübschmann; Susann Müller
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  CHIC-an automated approach for the detection of dynamic variations in complex microbial communities.

Authors:  Christin Koch; Ingo Fetzer; Hauke Harms; Susann Müller
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 4.355

4.  The currently used commercial DNA-extraction methods give different results of clostridial and actinobacterial populations derived from human fecal samples.

Authors:  Johanna Maukonen; Catarina Simões; Maria Saarela
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.194

Review 5.  The role of the microbiota in inflammation, carcinogenesis, and cancer therapy.

Authors:  Amiran Dzutsev; Romina S Goldszmid; Sophie Viaud; Laurence Zitvogel; Giorgio Trinchieri
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 6.  Analysis of the human gut microbiome and association with disease.

Authors:  Gary D Wu; James D Lewis
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  Phenotypically distinct subsets of CD4+ T cells induce or protect from chronic intestinal inflammation in C. B-17 scid mice.

Authors:  F Powrie; M W Leach; S Mauze; L B Caddle; R L Coffman
Journal:  Int Immunol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.823

Review 8.  Interactions between the microbiota and the immune system.

Authors:  Lora V Hooper; Dan R Littman; Andrew J Macpherson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Genomic variation landscape of the human gut microbiome.

Authors:  Siegfried Schloissnig; Manimozhiyan Arumugam; Shinichi Sunagawa; Makedonka Mitreva; Julien Tap; Ana Zhu; Alison Waller; Daniel R Mende; Jens Roat Kultima; John Martin; Karthik Kota; Shamil R Sunyaev; George M Weinstock; Peer Bork
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Long-term temporal analysis of the human fecal microbiota revealed a stable core of dominant bacterial species.

Authors:  Inés Martínez; Catherine E Muller; Jens Walter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  13 in total

1.  Characterizing Microbiome Dynamics - Flow Cytometry Based Workflows from Pure Cultures to Natural Communities.

Authors:  Johannes Lambrecht; Florian Schattenberg; Hauke Harms; Susann Mueller
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Metabolomics activity screening of T cell-induced colitis reveals anti-inflammatory metabolites.

Authors:  J Rafael Montenegro-Burke; Bernard P Kok; Carlos Guijas; Xavier Domingo-Almenara; Clara Moon; Andrea Galmozzi; Seiya Kitamura; Lars Eckmann; Enrique Saez; Gary E Siuzdak; Dennis W Wolan
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 8.192

3.  Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies.

Authors:  Andrea Cossarizza; Hyun-Dong Chang; Andreas Radbruch; Mübeccel Akdis; Immanuel Andrä; Francesco Annunziato; Petra Bacher; Vincenzo Barnaba; Luca Battistini; Wolfgang M Bauer; Sabine Baumgart; Burkhard Becher; Wolfgang Beisker; Claudia Berek; Alfonso Blanco; Giovanna Borsellino; Philip E Boulais; Ryan R Brinkman; Martin Büscher; Dirk H Busch; Timothy P Bushnell; Xuetao Cao; Andrea Cavani; Pratip K Chattopadhyay; Qingyu Cheng; Sue Chow; Mario Clerici; Anne Cooke; Antonio Cosma; Lorenzo Cosmi; Ana Cumano; Van Duc Dang; Derek Davies; Sara De Biasi; Genny Del Zotto; Silvia Della Bella; Paolo Dellabona; Günnur Deniz; Mark Dessing; Andreas Diefenbach; James Di Santo; Francesco Dieli; Andreas Dolf; Vera S Donnenberg; Thomas Dörner; Götz R A Ehrhardt; Elmar Endl; Pablo Engel; Britta Engelhardt; Charlotte Esser; Bart Everts; Anita Dreher; Christine S Falk; Todd A Fehniger; Andrew Filby; Simon Fillatreau; Marie Follo; Irmgard Förster; John Foster; Gemma A Foulds; Paul S Frenette; David Galbraith; Natalio Garbi; Maria Dolores García-Godoy; Jens Geginat; Kamran Ghoreschi; Lara Gibellini; Christoph Goettlinger; Carl S Goodyear; Andrea Gori; Jane Grogan; Mor Gross; Andreas Grützkau; Daryl Grummitt; Jonas Hahn; Quirin Hammer; Anja E Hauser; David L Haviland; David Hedley; Guadalupe Herrera; Martin Herrmann; Falk Hiepe; Tristan Holland; Pleun Hombrink; Jessica P Houston; Bimba F Hoyer; Bo Huang; Christopher A Hunter; Anna Iannone; Hans-Martin Jäck; Beatriz Jávega; Stipan Jonjic; Kerstin Juelke; Steffen Jung; Toralf Kaiser; Tomas Kalina; Baerbel Keller; Srijit Khan; Deborah Kienhöfer; Thomas Kroneis; Désirée Kunkel; Christian Kurts; Pia Kvistborg; Joanne Lannigan; Olivier Lantz; Anis Larbi; Salome LeibundGut-Landmann; Michael D Leipold; Megan K Levings; Virginia Litwin; Yanling Liu; Michael Lohoff; Giovanna Lombardi; Lilly Lopez; Amy Lovett-Racke; Erik Lubberts; Burkhard Ludewig; Enrico Lugli; Holden T Maecker; Glòria Martrus; Giuseppe Matarese; Christian Maueröder; Mairi McGrath; Iain McInnes; Henrik E Mei; Fritz Melchers; Susanne Melzer; Dirk Mielenz; Kingston Mills; David Mirrer; Jenny Mjösberg; Jonni Moore; Barry Moran; Alessandro Moretta; Lorenzo Moretta; Tim R Mosmann; Susann Müller; Werner Müller; Christian Münz; Gabriele Multhoff; Luis Enrique Munoz; Kenneth M Murphy; Toshinori Nakayama; Milena Nasi; Christine Neudörfl; John Nolan; Sussan Nourshargh; José-Enrique O'Connor; Wenjun Ouyang; Annette Oxenius; Raghav Palankar; Isabel Panse; Pärt Peterson; Christian Peth; Jordi Petriz; Daisy Philips; Winfried Pickl; Silvia Piconese; Marcello Pinti; A Graham Pockley; Malgorzata Justyna Podolska; Carlo Pucillo; Sally A Quataert; Timothy R D J Radstake; Bartek Rajwa; Jonathan A Rebhahn; Diether Recktenwald; Ester B M Remmerswaal; Katy Rezvani; Laura G Rico; J Paul Robinson; Chiara Romagnani; Anna Rubartelli; Beate Ruckert; Jürgen Ruland; Shimon Sakaguchi; Francisco Sala-de-Oyanguren; Yvonne Samstag; Sharon Sanderson; Birgit Sawitzki; Alexander Scheffold; Matthias Schiemann; Frank Schildberg; Esther Schimisky; Stephan A Schmid; Steffen Schmitt; Kilian Schober; Thomas Schüler; Axel Ronald Schulz; Ton Schumacher; Cristiano Scotta; T Vincent Shankey; Anat Shemer; Anna-Katharina Simon; Josef Spidlen; Alan M Stall; Regina Stark; Christina Stehle; Merle Stein; Tobit Steinmetz; Hannes Stockinger; Yousuke Takahama; Attila Tarnok; ZhiGang Tian; Gergely Toldi; Julia Tornack; Elisabetta Traggiai; Joe Trotter; Henning Ulrich; Marlous van der Braber; René A W van Lier; Marc Veldhoen; Salvador Vento-Asturias; Paulo Vieira; David Voehringer; Hans-Dieter Volk; Konrad von Volkmann; Ari Waisman; Rachael Walker; Michael D Ward; Klaus Warnatz; Sarah Warth; James V Watson; Carsten Watzl; Leonie Wegener; Annika Wiedemann; Jürgen Wienands; Gerald Willimsky; James Wing; Peter Wurst; Liping Yu; Alice Yue; Qianjun Zhang; Yi Zhao; Susanne Ziegler; Jakob Zimmermann
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 6.688

4.  Ecological Stability Properties of Microbial Communities Assessed by Flow Cytometry.

Authors:  Zishu Liu; Nicolas Cichocki; Fabian Bonk; Susanne Günther; Florian Schattenberg; Hauke Harms; Florian Centler; Susann Müller
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.389

5.  The intestinal microbiota determines the colitis-inducing potential of T-bet-deficient Th cells in mice.

Authors:  Jakob Zimmermann; Pawel Durek; Anja A Kühl; Florian Schattenberg; Patrick Maschmeyer; Francesco Siracusa; Katrin Lehmann; Kerstin Westendorf; Melanie Weber; René Riedel; Susann Müller; Andreas Radbruch; Hyun-Dong Chang
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  flowEMMi: an automated model-based clustering tool for microbial cytometric data.

Authors:  Joachim Ludwig; Christian Höner Zu Siederdissen; Zishu Liu; Peter F Stadler; Susann Müller
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Effects of oxygen exposure on relative nucleic acid content and membrane integrity in the human gut microbiota.

Authors:  Mariia Taguer; Ophélie Quillier; Corinne F Maurice
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Accurate identification and quantification of commensal microbiota bound by host immunoglobulins.

Authors:  Matthew A Jackson; Claire Pearson; Nicholas E Ilott; Kelsey E Huus; Ahmed N Hegazy; Jonathan Webber; B Brett Finlay; Andrew J Macpherson; Fiona Powrie; Lilian H Lam
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 14.650

9.  Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (second edition).

Authors:  Andrea Cossarizza; Hyun-Dong Chang; Andreas Radbruch; Andreas Acs; Dieter Adam; Sabine Adam-Klages; William W Agace; Nima Aghaeepour; Mübeccel Akdis; Matthieu Allez; Larissa Nogueira Almeida; Giorgia Alvisi; Graham Anderson; Immanuel Andrä; Francesco Annunziato; Achille Anselmo; Petra Bacher; Cosima T Baldari; Sudipto Bari; Vincenzo Barnaba; Joana Barros-Martins; Luca Battistini; Wolfgang Bauer; Sabine Baumgart; Nicole Baumgarth; Dirk Baumjohann; Bianka Baying; Mary Bebawy; Burkhard Becher; Wolfgang Beisker; Vladimir Benes; Rudi Beyaert; Alfonso Blanco; Dominic A Boardman; Christian Bogdan; Jessica G Borger; Giovanna Borsellino; Philip E Boulais; Jolene A Bradford; Dirk Brenner; Ryan R Brinkman; Anna E S Brooks; Dirk H Busch; Martin Büscher; Timothy P Bushnell; Federica Calzetti; Garth Cameron; Ilenia Cammarata; Xuetao Cao; Susanna L Cardell; Stefano Casola; Marco A Cassatella; Andrea Cavani; Antonio Celada; Lucienne Chatenoud; Pratip K Chattopadhyay; Sue Chow; Eleni Christakou; Luka Čičin-Šain; Mario Clerici; Federico S Colombo; Laura Cook; Anne Cooke; Andrea M Cooper; Alexandra J Corbett; Antonio Cosma; Lorenzo Cosmi; Pierre G Coulie; Ana Cumano; Ljiljana Cvetkovic; Van Duc Dang; Chantip Dang-Heine; Martin S Davey; Derek Davies; Sara De Biasi; Genny Del Zotto; Gelo Victoriano Dela Cruz; Michael Delacher; Silvia Della Bella; Paolo Dellabona; Günnur Deniz; Mark Dessing; James P Di Santo; Andreas Diefenbach; Francesco Dieli; Andreas Dolf; Thomas Dörner; Regine J Dress; Diana Dudziak; Michael Dustin; Charles-Antoine Dutertre; Friederike Ebner; Sidonia B G Eckle; Matthias Edinger; Pascale Eede; Götz R A Ehrhardt; Marcus Eich; Pablo Engel; Britta Engelhardt; Anna Erdei; Charlotte Esser; Bart Everts; Maximilien Evrard; Christine S Falk; Todd A Fehniger; Mar Felipo-Benavent; Helen Ferry; Markus Feuerer; Andrew Filby; Kata Filkor; Simon Fillatreau; Marie Follo; Irmgard Förster; John Foster; Gemma A Foulds; Britta Frehse; Paul S Frenette; Stefan Frischbutter; Wolfgang Fritzsche; David W Galbraith; Anastasia Gangaev; Natalio Garbi; Brice Gaudilliere; Ricardo T Gazzinelli; Jens Geginat; Wilhelm Gerner; Nicholas A Gherardin; Kamran Ghoreschi; Lara Gibellini; Florent Ginhoux; Keisuke Goda; Dale I Godfrey; Christoph Goettlinger; Jose M González-Navajas; Carl S Goodyear; Andrea Gori; Jane L Grogan; Daryl Grummitt; Andreas Grützkau; Claudia Haftmann; Jonas Hahn; Hamida Hammad; Günter Hämmerling; Leo Hansmann; Goran Hansson; Christopher M Harpur; Susanne Hartmann; Andrea Hauser; Anja E Hauser; David L Haviland; David Hedley; Daniela C Hernández; Guadalupe Herrera; Martin Herrmann; Christoph Hess; Thomas Höfer; Petra Hoffmann; Kristin Hogquist; Tristan Holland; Thomas Höllt; Rikard Holmdahl; Pleun Hombrink; Jessica P Houston; Bimba F Hoyer; Bo Huang; Fang-Ping Huang; Johanna E Huber; Jochen Huehn; Michael Hundemer; Christopher A Hunter; William Y K Hwang; Anna Iannone; Florian Ingelfinger; Sabine M Ivison; Hans-Martin Jäck; Peter K Jani; Beatriz Jávega; Stipan Jonjic; Toralf Kaiser; Tomas Kalina; Thomas Kamradt; Stefan H E Kaufmann; Baerbel Keller; Steven L C Ketelaars; Ahad Khalilnezhad; Srijit Khan; Jan Kisielow; Paul Klenerman; Jasmin Knopf; Hui-Fern Koay; Katja Kobow; Jay K Kolls; Wan Ting Kong; Manfred Kopf; Thomas Korn; Katharina Kriegsmann; Hendy Kristyanto; Thomas Kroneis; Andreas Krueger; Jenny Kühne; Christian Kukat; Désirée Kunkel; Heike Kunze-Schumacher; Tomohiro Kurosaki; Christian Kurts; Pia Kvistborg; Immanuel Kwok; Jonathan Landry; Olivier Lantz; Paola Lanuti; Francesca LaRosa; Agnès Lehuen; Salomé LeibundGut-Landmann; Michael D Leipold; Leslie Y T Leung; Megan K Levings; Andreia C Lino; Francesco Liotta; Virginia Litwin; Yanling Liu; Hans-Gustaf Ljunggren; Michael Lohoff; Giovanna Lombardi; Lilly Lopez; Miguel López-Botet; Amy E Lovett-Racke; Erik Lubberts; Herve Luche; Burkhard Ludewig; Enrico Lugli; Sebastian Lunemann; Holden T Maecker; Laura Maggi; Orla Maguire; Florian Mair; Kerstin H Mair; Alberto Mantovani; Rudolf A Manz; Aaron J Marshall; Alicia Martínez-Romero; Glòria Martrus; Ivana Marventano; Wlodzimierz Maslinski; Giuseppe Matarese; Anna Vittoria Mattioli; Christian Maueröder; Alessio Mazzoni; James McCluskey; Mairi McGrath; Helen M McGuire; Iain B McInnes; Henrik E Mei; Fritz Melchers; Susanne Melzer; Dirk Mielenz; Stephen D Miller; Kingston H G Mills; Hans Minderman; Jenny Mjösberg; Jonni Moore; Barry Moran; Lorenzo Moretta; Tim R Mosmann; Susann Müller; Gabriele Multhoff; Luis Enrique Muñoz; Christian Münz; Toshinori Nakayama; Milena Nasi; Katrin Neumann; Lai Guan Ng; Antonia Niedobitek; Sussan Nourshargh; Gabriel Núñez; José-Enrique O'Connor; Aaron Ochel; Anna Oja; Diana Ordonez; Alberto Orfao; Eva Orlowski-Oliver; Wenjun Ouyang; Annette Oxenius; Raghavendra Palankar; Isabel Panse; Kovit Pattanapanyasat; Malte Paulsen; Dinko Pavlinic; Livius Penter; Pärt Peterson; Christian Peth; Jordi Petriz; Federica Piancone; Winfried F Pickl; Silvia Piconese; Marcello Pinti; A Graham Pockley; Malgorzata Justyna Podolska; Zhiyong Poon; Katharina Pracht; Immo Prinz; Carlo E M Pucillo; Sally A Quataert; Linda Quatrini; Kylie M Quinn; Helena Radbruch; Tim R D J Radstake; Susann Rahmig; Hans-Peter Rahn; Bartek Rajwa; Gevitha Ravichandran; Yotam Raz; Jonathan A Rebhahn; Diether Recktenwald; Dorothea Reimer; Caetano Reis e Sousa; Ester B M Remmerswaal; Lisa Richter; Laura G Rico; Andy Riddell; Aja M Rieger; J Paul Robinson; Chiara Romagnani; Anna Rubartelli; Jürgen Ruland; Armin Saalmüller; Yvan Saeys; Takashi Saito; Shimon Sakaguchi; Francisco Sala-de-Oyanguren; Yvonne Samstag; Sharon Sanderson; Inga Sandrock; Angela Santoni; Ramon Bellmàs Sanz; Marina Saresella; Catherine Sautes-Fridman; Birgit Sawitzki; Linda Schadt; Alexander Scheffold; Hans U Scherer; Matthias Schiemann; Frank A Schildberg; Esther Schimisky; Andreas Schlitzer; Josephine Schlosser; Stephan Schmid; Steffen Schmitt; Kilian Schober; Daniel Schraivogel; Wolfgang Schuh; Thomas Schüler; Reiner Schulte; Axel Ronald Schulz; Sebastian R Schulz; Cristiano Scottá; Daniel Scott-Algara; David P Sester; T Vincent Shankey; Bruno Silva-Santos; Anna Katharina Simon; Katarzyna M Sitnik; Silvano Sozzani; Daniel E Speiser; Josef Spidlen; Anders Stahlberg; Alan M Stall; Natalie Stanley; Regina Stark; Christina Stehle; Tobit Steinmetz; Hannes Stockinger; Yousuke Takahama; Kiyoshi Takeda; Leonard Tan; Attila Tárnok; Gisa Tiegs; Gergely Toldi; Julia Tornack; Elisabetta Traggiai; Mohamed Trebak; Timothy I M Tree; Joe Trotter; John Trowsdale; Maria Tsoumakidou; Henning Ulrich; Sophia Urbanczyk; Willem van de Veen; Maries van den Broek; Edwin van der Pol; Sofie Van Gassen; Gert Van Isterdael; René A W van Lier; Marc Veldhoen; Salvador Vento-Asturias; Paulo Vieira; David Voehringer; Hans-Dieter Volk; Anouk von Borstel; Konrad von Volkmann; Ari Waisman; Rachael V Walker; Paul K Wallace; Sa A Wang; Xin M Wang; Michael D Ward; Kirsten A Ward-Hartstonge; Klaus Warnatz; Gary Warnes; Sarah Warth; Claudia Waskow; James V Watson; Carsten Watzl; Leonie Wegener; Thomas Weisenburger; Annika Wiedemann; Jürgen Wienands; Anneke Wilharm; Robert John Wilkinson; Gerald Willimsky; James B Wing; Rieke Winkelmann; Thomas H Winkler; Oliver F Wirz; Alicia Wong; Peter Wurst; Jennie H M Yang; Juhao Yang; Maria Yazdanbakhsh; Liping Yu; Alice Yue; Hanlin Zhang; Yi Zhao; Susanne Maria Ziegler; Christina Zielinski; Jakob Zimmermann; Arturo Zychlinsky
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 6.688

10.  Raman-deuterium isotope probing to study metabolic activities of single bacterial cells in human intestinal microbiota.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Jiabao Xu; Lingchao Kong; Tang Liu; Lingbo Yi; Hongjuan Wang; Wei E Huang; Chunmiao Zheng
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 5.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.