| Literature DB >> 26909672 |
Jakob Zimmermann1, Thomas Hübschmann2, Florian Schattenberg2, Joachim Schumann2, Pawel Durek1, René Riedel1, Marie Friedrich3, Rainer Glauben3, Britta Siegmund3, Andreas Radbruch1, Susann Müller2, Hyun-Dong Chang1.
Abstract
Using high-resolution flow cytometry of bacterial shape (forward scatter) and DNA content (DAPI staining), we detected dramatic differences in the fecal microbiota composition during murine colitis that were validated using 16S rDNA sequencing. This innovative method provides a fast and inexpensive tool to interrogate the microbiota on the single-cell level.Entities:
Keywords: Flow cytometry; IBD; Microbiota; Single-cell analysis; T-cell transfer colitis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26909672 PMCID: PMC5084791 DOI: 10.1002/eji.201646297
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Immunol ISSN: 0014-2980 Impact factor: 5.532
Figure 1Flow cytometry detects dynamic changes in the microbiota during colitis. Colitis was induced by i.v. transfer of 4 × 105 CD4+ CD45RBhi T cells into Rag1−/− recipients. Fecal bacteria were stained with DAPI and analyzed by flow cytometry as detailed in the Materials and methods provided in the supplemental information. (A) Representative plots of bacterial forward scatter (FSC, x‐axis) and DNA content (DAPI, y‐axis) of the fecal microbiota in healthy mice (upper panel) and during colitis (lower panel) without (left) and with (right) electronic gates. The two white spots mark the area of the control beads, 0.5 and 1 μm diameter which were gated out electronically (See Supporting Information Fig. 2 for full gating strategy). (B) Frequencies of events in gates shown in (A) for healthy and colitic mice filtered for significantly different gates and sorted for FDR‐adjusted p‐value depicted as median and 25th/75th percentile (box) and min/max values (whiskers). Data show n = 12 healthy mice and n = 11 mice after colitis onset pooled from three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 by Student's t‐test for independent samples and Benjamini–Hochberg FDR adjustment. (C) Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot for n = 12 healthy mice and n = 11 mice after colitis onset (same as for (A) and (B)). (D) Frequencies of fecal bacteria in selected populations analyzed at days 0, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 15 after colitis induction in four individual mice (black lines and symbols, mean ± SEM, left y‐axis). Means ± SEM of relative weight (gray line, right y‐axis) and diarrhea score (gray dashed, left y‐axis). Shown is one representative experiment of two experiments with comparable results.
Figure 2Electronic gates comprise distinct bacterial phyla. Bacteria were sorted by FACS from the feces of n = 3 individual mice before and/or after the onset of T‐cell transfer‐induced colitis. Isolated DNA was analyzed by next‐generation sequencing and classified with the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) as specified in the Materials and methods provided in the supplemental information. (A) 16s rDNA sequence analysis of flow‐sorted populations of fecal bacteria from n = 3 individual mice (same individuals as for Supporting Information Fig. 4) before and/or after the onset of T‐cell transfer colitis. Depicted is the phylogenetic composition of the gates as median frequencies of bacterial taxa that make up ≥ 50% of at least one of the sorted populations. (See Supporting Information Fig. 6 for detailed composition) (B) Frequencies of events in cytometric gates (black symbols) and corresponding frequencies of 16s rDNA reads (gray symbols) for the taxa identified in (A) in n = 3 individual healthy mice (filled circles) and after the onset of colitis (filled rectangles).