| Literature DB >> 26909177 |
Samantha Neil1, Jane Evans2, Janet Montgomery1, Chris Scarre1.
Abstract
Development of agriculture is often assumed to be accompanied by a decline in residential mobility, and sedentism is frequently proposed to provide the basis for economic intensification, population growth and increasing social complexity. In Britain, however, the nature of the agricultural transition (ca 4000 BC) and its effect on residence patterns has been intensely debated. Some authors attribute the transition to the arrival of populations who practised a system of sedentary intensive mixed farming similar to that of the very earliest agricultural regimes in central Europe, ca 5500 BC, with cultivation of crops in fixed plots and livestock keeping close to permanently occupied farmsteads. Others argue that local hunter-gatherers within Britain adopted selected elements of a farming economy and retained a mobile way of life. We use strontium and oxygen isotope analysis of tooth enamel from an Early Neolithic burial population in Gloucestershire, England, to evaluate the residence patterns of early farmers. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that early farming communities in Britain were residentially mobile and were not fully sedentary. Results highlight the diverse nature of settlement strategies associated with early farming in Europe and are of wider significance to understanding the effect of the transition to agriculture on residence patterns.Entities:
Keywords: Neolithic; development of agriculture; isotope analysis; mobility; sedentism; strontium
Year: 2016 PMID: 26909177 PMCID: PMC4736932 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.150522
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Strontium isotope ratios, strontium concentrations and δ18Ocarbonate and δ13Ccarbonate values in enamel of humans and animals from Hazleton North. Approximate age at death is based on tooth eruption after Rogers [75], pp. 190–191; L = left, R = right; mandibular first, second and third permanent molar teeth are designated as M1, M2 and M3, respectively; second permanent premolar teeth are designated as PM2; first mandibular central permanent incisor teeth designated as LI1.
| sample number | location | context/ box number | age at death | tooth | 87Sr/86Sr | Sr ppm (mg kg−1) | δ13Ccarbonate ‰ VPDB | δ18Ocarbonate ‰ VPDB | δ18Ocarbonate ‰ VSMOW | δ18Ophosphate ‰ VSMOW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 414/individual G | north chamber basal fill | 336 | 3–4 years | mandibular LM1 | 0.71027 | 54 | −16.0 | −3.8 | 27.0 | 18.2 |
| 10494 | south chamber fill | 412 | adult | maxillary LM3 | 0.70963 | 49 | −15.1 | −4.0 | 26.8 | 18.0 |
| 11456 | south chamber fill | 412 | adult | mandibular LM2 | 0.71036 | 67 | −15.2 | −4.2 | 26.6 | 17.8 |
| mandibular LM3 | 0.71016 | 58 | −16.7 | −4.4 | 26.4 | 17.6 | ||||
| 11 903 | pre-cairn; SW quad cell S | 211 | unknown | loose premolar | 0.70866 | 45 | −16.0 | −3.5 | 27.3 | 18.5 |
| 12527 | south chamber | 453 | 6–9 years | mandibular RM1 | 0.70833 | 62 | −16.1 | −2.5 | 28.3 | 19.5 |
| 3596 | south entrance fill | 354 | adult | mandibular RPM2 | 0.70853 | 47 | −16.1 | −3.8 | 27.0 | 18.2 |
| 3793 | south entrance fill | 354 | adult | mandibular RM1 | 0.70818 | 63 | −14.9 | −3.1 | 27.8 | 19.0 |
| mandibular RM2 | 0.70818 | 44 | −14.7 | −3.8 | 27.0 | 18.2 | ||||
| mandibular RM3 | 0.71033 | 101 | −15.7 | −3.1 | 27.7 | 18.9 | ||||
| 3831 | south entrance fill | 354 | adult | mandibular RM2 | 0.71036 | 144 | −15.0 | −4.0 | 26.8 | 18.0 |
| mandibular RM3 | 0.70838 | 35 | −16.3 | −3.8 | 27.0 | 18.2 | ||||
| 4077/4169 | south entrance fill | 354 | adult | mandibular RM1 | 0.70835 | 37 | −16.0 | −2.9 | 28.0 | 19.2 |
| mandibular RM2 | 0.70827 | 30 | −15.5 | −3.7 | 27.1 | 18.3 | ||||
| mandibular RM3 | 0.70806 | 24 | −16.3 | −4.2 | 26.6 | 17.8 | ||||
| 4118 | north entrance fill | 267 | adult | mandibular LI1 | 0.71027 | 65 | −15.4 | −3.5 | 27.3 | 18.5 |
| 4786 | south chamber passage | 187 | adult | maxillary LM2 | 0.70839 | 48 | −14.7 | −3.1 | 27.7 | 18.9 |
| 4806/7387 | south chamber passage | 323 | adult | mandibular LM1 | 0.70887 | 39 | −16.4 | −3.0 | 27.8 | 19.1 |
| 5037/Skeleton 1 | north entrance | 267 | adult | maxillary LM1 | 0.70797 | 22 | −16.5 | −3.9 | 26.9 | 18.1 |
| maxillary RM2 | 0.70804 | 22 | −16.0 | −3.7 | 27.1 | 18.3 | ||||
| maxillary RM3 | 0.70825 | 27 | −15.9 | −3.8 | 27.0 | 18.1 | ||||
| 5880 | north chamber basal fill | 336 | adult | mandibular LM1 | 0.70957 | 85 | −15.2 | −3.2 | 27.6 | 18.8 |
| mandibular LM2 | 0.70912 | 52 | −15.8 | −3.2 | 27.6 | 18.8 | ||||
| mandibular LM3 | 0.70888 | 40 | −16.1 | −3.8 | 27.0 | 18.2 | ||||
| 7386/6815 | south chamber passage | 323 | adult | mandibular LPM2 | 0.70838 | 45 | −15.5 | −4.4 | 26.4 | 17.6 |
| 7656 | south chamber passage | 323 | adult | mandibular RM1 | 0.70794 | 41 | −15.2 | −3.0 | 27.2 | 19.1 |
| mandibular RM2 | 0.70855 | 55 | −14.5 | −3.6 | 27.2 | 18.4 | ||||
| mandibular RM3 | 0.70813 | 32 | −16.4 | −3.6 | 27.2 | 18.4 | ||||
| 8701/individual E | south chamber fill | 412 | 12–15 years | mandibular RM1 | 0.70807 | 40 | −16.1 | −3.9 | 26.9 | 18.1 |
| 8751 | south chamber fill | 412 | adult | mandibular LM2 | 0.70804 | 37 | −15.8 | −3.7 | 27.1 | 18.2 |
| mandibular LM3 | 0.71066 | 84 | −16.0 | −3.3 | 27.5 | 18.7 | ||||
| 8974 | south entrance fill | 353 | adult | mandibular LM2 | 0.70962 | 76 | −15.9 | −4.4 | 26.4 | 17.6 |
| mandibular LM3 | 0.71120 | 88 | −15.6 | −4.0 | 26.8 | 18.0 | ||||
| 9025 | north chamber fill | 435 | adult | mandibular LM1 | 0.71262 | 74 | −15.6 | −3.2 | 27.6 | 18.8 |
| 9951 | south chamber fill | 412 | 9–10 years | mandibular LM1 | 0.70810 | 62 | −15.5 | −4.0 | 26.8 | 18.0 |
| HBG HN82/15 374 cow | pre-cairn/NW quad cell R | 211/box 23 | unknown | loose molar tooth | 0.71059 | 180 | ||||
| HBG HN82/16 065 pig | pre-cairn/NW quad cell R | 211/box 29 | unknown | maxillary LM3 | 0.70774 | 82 | ||||
| HBG HN82/18 304 sheep/goat | pre-cairn/SW quad cell S | 211/box 31 | unknown | loose molar tooth | 0.70821 | 216 |
Figure 1.Map of bedrock geology illustrating sites and locations discussed in the text. Based on British Geological Survey and Ordnance Survey map data, reproduced with permission of the British Geological Survey and Ordnance Survey, © NERC/Crown copyright 2015. Bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr ranges associated with different lithologies are based on measured values by Evans et al. [51], Warham [52] and Chenery et al.[78].
Figure 2.Plot of strontium isotope ratio versus the inverse of concentration (1/Sr ppm × 1000) for individuals and animals. Dashed lines delineate the approximate 87Sr/86Sr biosphere range available on Oolitic limestone. Light green symbols indicate individuals who can be interpreted as sedentary and red symbols denote the rest of the population. Tooth types are denoted by the key in the upper right of the diagram. Cow, sheep/goat and pig labelled within the diagram are from pre-cairn contexts. 2σ errors for 87Sr/86Sr are within the symbol.
Figure 3.Plot of 87Sr/86Sr and δ18Ocarbonate results. Dashed lines denote the local 87Sr/86Sr biosphere range. Teeth highlighted in orange have 87Sr/86Sr values that are comparable to the local biosphere range and δ18Ocarbonate values that cluster close to 27.0‰. Tooth types are illustrated within the key in the upper right of the diagram. 2σ errors for 87Sr/86Sr are within the symbol. Analytical error for δ18Ocarbonate is shown as ±0.2‰ (2σ).