Literature DB >> 26908888

Effects of light sources and intensity on broilers grown to heavy weights. Part 1: Growth performance, carcass characteristics, and welfare indices.

H A Olanrewaju1, W W Miller2, W R Maslin3, S D Collier4, J L Purswell4, S L Branton4.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of light sources and light intensity on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and welfare indices of heavy broilers (>3.0 kg) in 4 trials with 2 replications per trial. A total of 960 one-day-old Ross×Ross 708 chicks (30 males/30 females/room) were randomly distributed into 16 environmentally controlled rooms at 50% RH. A 4×2 factorial treatment structure evaluated 4 light sources (incandescent [ICD, standard], compact fluorescent [CFL], neutral light emitting diode [Neutral-LED], and cool poultry specific filtered LED [Cool-PSF-LED]) and 2 levels (5 lx, 20 lx) of light intensities. Each of the 4 light sources was paired with one of the 2 light intensities. Birds were fed the same diet with a 4-phase feeding program (starter, grower, finisher, and withdrawal). Feed and water were provided ad libitum. Birds and feed were weighed on one, 14, 21, 28, 42, and 56 d of age for growth performance. All mortality was recorded daily and feed conversion was adjusted for mortality. Immune response was determined on d 28 to d 35, whereas other welfare indices were performed on d 42 and 49, respectively. At d 56 of each trial, 20 (10 males and 10 females) birds from each room were processed to determine weights and yields. The BW, BW gain, live weight, and carcass weights of birds reared under Cool-PSF-LED were different (P≤0.05) in comparison to birds reared under ICD. However, FI, FCR, and mortality were not affected by treatments. There was no effect of treatments on fat or breast and tender weights and yields. In addition, there was no effect of treatments on ocular development, immune response, and other welfare indices, suggesting that the light sources evaluated did not compromise welfare of heavy broilers. It was concluded that the 3 light sources evaluated in this study may be suitable for replacement of ICD light source in poultry facilities to reduce energy cost and optimize production efficiency. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Poultry Science Association Inc. 2016. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Keywords:  broilers; growth performance; light intensity; light sources; welfare

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26908888     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pev360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  9 in total

1.  Artificial light and biological responses of broiler chickens: dose-response.

Authors:  Yefeng Yang; Chenghao Pan; Renhai Zhong; Jinming Pan
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The effect of monochromatic, combined, and mixed light-emitting diode light regimes on growth traits, fear responses, and slaughter-carcass characteristics in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Y Sayin; O Kaplan; E Karaduman; D M Haqyar; D Narinç
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 1.893

3.  Light emitting diode (LED) color and broiler growth: effect of supplementing blue/green LED to white LED light on broiler growth, stress, and welfare.

Authors:  Jill R Nelson; Joey L Bray; Juliette Delabbio; Gregory S Archer
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Evaluation of Chemical Composition and Meat Quality of Breast Muscle in Broilers Reared under Light-Emitting Diode.

Authors:  Francesca Bennato; Andrea Ianni; Camillo Martino; Lisa Grotta; Giuseppe Martino
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Impact of lighting color and duration on productive performance and Newcastle disease vaccination efficiency in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Essam S Soliman; Rania A Hassan
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2019-07-17

6.  Effects of dietary Original XPC on selected blood variables in layer pullets challenged with Mycoplasma gallisepticum,.

Authors:  E D Peebles; K E C Elliott; S L Branton; J D Evans; S A Leigh; E J Kim; H A Olanrewaju; G T Pharr; H O Pavlidis; P D Gerard
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Artificial light and biting flies: the parallel development of attractive light traps and unattractive domestic lights.

Authors:  Roksana Wilson; Andrew Wakefield; Nicholas Roberts; Gareth Jones
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.047

8.  From the Point of View of the Chickens: What Difference Does a Window Make?

Authors:  Elaine Cristina de Oliveira Sans; Frank André Maurice Tuyttens; Cesar Augusto Taconeli; Ana Silvia Pedrazzani; Marcos Martinez Vale; Carla Forte Maiolino Molento
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Interactive effects of light-sources, photoperiod, and strains on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and health indices of broilers grown to heavy weights1.

Authors:  H A Olanrewaju; W W Miller; W R Maslin; S D Collier; J L Purswell; S L Branton
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.352

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.