Michael Freitag1. 1. Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-7305 freitagm@oregonstate.edu.
Abstract
Chromosome segregation relies on coordinated activity of a large assembly of proteins, the kinetochore interaction network (KIN). How conserved the underlying mechanisms driving the epigenetic phenomenon of centromere and kinetochore assembly and maintenance are remains unclear, even though various eukaryotic models have been studied. More than 50 different proteins, many in multiple copies, comprise the KIN or are associated with fungal centromeres and kinetochores. Proteins isolated from immune sera recognized centromeric regions on chromosomes and thus were named centromere proteins (CENPs). CENP-A, sometimes called centromere-specific H3 (CenH3), is incorporated into nucleosomes within or near centromeres. The constitutive centromere-associated network (CCAN) assembles on this specialized chromatin, likely based on specific interactions with and requiring presence of CENP-C. The outer kinetochore comprises the Knl1-Mis12-Ndc80 (KMN) protein complexes that connect CCAN to spindles, accomplished by binding and stabilizing microtubules (MTs) and in the process generating load-bearing assemblies for chromatid segregation. In most fungi the Dam1/DASH complex connects the KMN complexes to MTs. Fungi present a rich resource to investigate mechanistic commonalities but also differences in kinetochore architecture. While ascomycetes have sets of CCAN and KMN proteins that are conserved with those of budding yeast or metazoans, searching other major branches of the fungal kingdom revealed that CCAN proteins are poorly conserved at the primary sequence level. Several conserved binding motifs or domains within KMN complexes have been described recently, and these features of ascomycete KIN proteins are shared with most metazoan proteins. In addition, several ascomycete-specific domains have been identified here.
Chromosome segregation relies on coordinated activity of a large assembly of proteins, the kinetochore interaction network (KIN). How conserved the underlying mechanisms driving the epigenetic phenomenon of centromere and kinetochore assembly and maintenance are remains unclear, even though various eukaryotic models have been studied. More than 50 different proteins, many in multiple copies, comprise the KIN or are associated with fungal centromeres and kinetochores. Proteins isolated from immune sera recognized centromeric regions on chromosomes and thus were named centromere proteins (CENPs). n>an class="Gene">CENP-A, sometimes called centromere-specific H3 (CenH3), is incorporated into nucleosomes within or near centromeres. The constitutive centromere-associated network (CCAN) assembles on this specialized chromatin, likely based on specific interactions with and requiring presence of CENP-C. The outer kinetochore comprises the Knl1-Mis12-Ndc80 (KMN) protein complexes that connect CCAN to spindles, accomplished by binding and stabilizing microtubules (MTs) and in the process generating load-bearing assemblies for chromatid segregation. In most fungi the Dam1/DASH complex connects the KMN complexes to MTs. Fungi present a rich resource to investigate mechanistic commonalities but also differences in kinetochore architecture. While ascomycetes have sets of CCAN and KMN proteins that are conserved with those of budding yeast or metazoans, searching other major branches of the fungal kingdom revealed that CCAN proteins are poorly conserved at the primary sequence level. Several conserved binding motifs or domains within KMN complexes have been described recently, and these features of ascomycete KIN proteins are shared with most metazoan proteins. In addition, several ascomycete-specific domains have been identified here.
Authors: Claudio Ciferri; Sebastiano Pasqualato; Emanuela Screpanti; Gianluca Varetti; Stefano Santaguida; Gabriel Dos Reis; Alessio Maiolica; Jessica Polka; Jennifer G De Luca; Peter De Wulf; Mogjiborahman Salek; Juri Rappsilber; Carolyn A Moores; Edward D Salmon; Andrea Musacchio Journal: Cell Date: 2008-05-02 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Daniele Fachinetti; H Diego Folco; Yael Nechemia-Arbely; Luis P Valente; Kristen Nguyen; Alex J Wong; Quan Zhu; Andrew J Holland; Arshad Desai; Lars E T Jansen; Don W Cleveland Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2013-07-21 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Emanuela Screpanti; Anna De Antoni; Gregory M Alushin; Arsen Petrovic; Tiziana Melis; Eva Nogales; Andrea Musacchio Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2011-02-25 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: I M Cheeseman; C Brew; M Wolyniak; A Desai; S Anderson; N Muster; J R Yates; T C Huffaker; D G Drubin; G Barnes Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2001-12-24 Impact factor: 10.539