Literature DB >> 26908545

Seeking harmony: estimands and sensitivity analyses for confirmatory clinical trials.

Devan V Mehrotra1, Robert J Hemmings2, Estelle Russek-Cohen3.   

Abstract

In October 2014, the Steering Committee of the International Conference on Harmonization endorsed the formation of an expert working group to develop an addendum to the International Conference on Harmonization E9 guideline ("Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials"). The addendum will focus on two topics involving randomized confirmatory clinical trials: estimands and sensitivity analyses. Both topics are motivated, in part, by the need to improve the precision with which scientific questions of interest are formulated and addressed by clinical trialists and regulators, specifically in the context of post-randomization events such as use of rescue medication or missing data resulting from dropouts. Given the importance of these topics for the statistical and medical community, we articulate the reasons for the planned addendum. The resulting "ICH E9/R1" guideline will include a framework for improved trial planning, conduct, analysis, and interpretation; a draft is expected to be ready for public comment in the second half of 2016.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dropouts; International Conference on Harmonization E9; estimand; missing data; sensitivity analysis; trial planning

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26908545     DOI: 10.1177/1740774516633115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  4 in total

1.  Longitudinal changes in the quality of life of oral cancer patients during the perioperative period.

Authors:  Takayuki Aoki; Yoshihide Ota; Takatsugu Suzuki; Yuya Denda; Ken-Ichi Aoyama; Takeshi Akiba; Mariko Naito; Toshihiro Arai
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  A structured methodology review showed analyses of functional outcomes are frequently limited to "survivors only" in trials enrolling patients at high risk of death.

Authors:  Elizabeth Colantuoni; Ximin Li; Mohamed D Hashem; Timothy D Girard; Daniel O Scharfstein; Dale M Needham
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 7.407

Review 3.  Incorporating and interpreting regulatory guidance on estimands in diabetes clinical trials: The PIONEER 1 randomized clinical trial as an example.

Authors:  Vanita R Aroda; Trine Saugstrup; John B Buse; Morten Donsmark; Jeppe Zacho; Melanie J Davies
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2019-06-30       Impact factor: 6.577

4.  Hernia reduction following laparotomy using small stitch abdominal wall closure with and without mesh augmentation (the HULC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Patrick Heger; Manuel Feißt; Johannes Krisam; Christina Klose; Colette Dörr-Harim; Solveig Tenckhoff; Markus W Büchler; Markus K Diener; André L Mihaljevic
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.