Alexander M Clark1, Kelly S Wiens2, Davina Banner3, Jennifer Kryworuchko4, Lorraine Thirsk5, Lianne McLean2, Kay Currie6. 1. Faculty of Nursing, Level 3 ECHA, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 2. Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 3. Faculty of Nursing, University of North British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada. 4. Faculty of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada. 5. Covenant Health, Edmonton, Canada. 6. Department of Nursing & Community Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify the main mechanisms of heart failure (HF) disease management programmes based in hospitals, homes or the community. METHODS: Systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies using realist synthesis. The search strategy incorporated general and specific terms relevant to the research question: HF, self-care and programmes/interventions for HF patients. To be included, papers had to be published in English after 1995 (due to changes in HF care over recent years) to May 2014 and contain specific data related to mechanisms of effect of HF programmes. 10 databases were searched; grey literature was located via Proquest Dissertations and Theses, Google and publications from organisations focused on HF or self-care. RESULTS: 33 studies (n=3355 participants, mean age: 65 years, 35% women) were identified (18 randomised controlled trials, three mixed methods studies, six pre-test post-test studies and six qualitative studies). The main mechanisms identified in the studies were associated with increased patient understanding of HF and its links to self-care, greater involvement of other people in this self-care, increased psychosocial well-being and support from health professionals to use technology. CONCLUSION: Future HF disease management programmes should seek to harness the main mechanisms through which programmes actually work to improve HF self-care and outcomes, rather than simply replicating components from other programmes. The most promising mechanisms to harness are associated with increased patient understanding and self-efficacy, involvement of other caregivers and health professionals and improving psychosocial well-being and technology use. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
OBJECTIVE: To identify the main mechanisms of heart failure (HF) disease management programmes based in hospitals, homes or the community. METHODS: Systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies using realist synthesis. The search strategy incorporated general and specific terms relevant to the research question: HF, self-care and programmes/interventions for HF patients. To be included, papers had to be published in English after 1995 (due to changes in HF care over recent years) to May 2014 and contain specific data related to mechanisms of effect of HF programmes. 10 databases were searched; grey literature was located via Proquest Dissertations and Theses, Google and publications from organisations focused on HF or self-care. RESULTS: 33 studies (n=3355 participants, mean age: 65 years, 35% women) were identified (18 randomised controlled trials, three mixed methods studies, six pre-test post-test studies and six qualitative studies). The main mechanisms identified in the studies were associated with increased patient understanding of HF and its links to self-care, greater involvement of other people in this self-care, increased psychosocial well-being and support from health professionals to use technology. CONCLUSION: Future HF disease management programmes should seek to harness the main mechanisms through which programmes actually work to improve HF self-care and outcomes, rather than simply replicating components from other programmes. The most promising mechanisms to harness are associated with increased patient understanding and self-efficacy, involvement of other caregivers and health professionals and improving psychosocial well-being and technology use. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Authors: Bettina Zippel-Schultz; Carsten Schultz; Dirk Müller-Wieland; Andrew B Remppis; Martin Stockburger; Christian Perings; Thomas M Helms Journal: Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol Date: 2021-01-15
Authors: Harleah G Buck; Anna Stromberg; Misook L Chung; Kristine A Donovan; Karen Harkness; Allison M Howard; Naoko Kato; Randall Polo; Lorraine S Evangelista Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2017-10-19 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Julie T Bidwell; Melinda K Higgins; Carolyn M Reilly; Patricia C Clark; Sandra B Dunbar Journal: Heart Lung Date: 2017-11-15 Impact factor: 2.210
Authors: Barbara Riegel; Debra K Moser; Harleah G Buck; Victoria Vaughan Dickson; Sandra B Dunbar; Christopher S Lee; Terry A Lennie; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Judith E Mitchell; Diane J Treat-Jacobson; David E Webber Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 5.501